These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31039552)

  • 1. Biometric identification of listener identity from frequency following responses to speech.
    Llanos F; Xie Z; Chandrasekaran B
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Jul; 16(5):056004. PubMed ID: 31039552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hidden Markov modeling of frequency-following responses to Mandarin lexical tones.
    Llanos F; Xie Z; Chandrasekaran B
    J Neurosci Methods; 2017 Nov; 291():101-112. PubMed ID: 28807860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception in normal-hearing listeners.
    Bidelman GM; Momtaz S
    Neurosci Lett; 2021 Feb; 746():135664. PubMed ID: 33497718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Brainstem correlates of concurrent speech identification in adverse listening conditions.
    Yellamsetty A; Bidelman GM
    Brain Res; 2019 Jul; 1714():182-192. PubMed ID: 30796895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subcortical sources dominate the neuroelectric auditory frequency-following response to speech.
    Bidelman GM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 175():56-69. PubMed ID: 29604459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of language experience and stimulus context on the neural organization and categorical perception of speech.
    Bidelman GM; Lee CC
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():191-200. PubMed ID: 26146197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response properties of the human frequency-following response (FFR) to speech and non-speech sounds: level dependence, adaptation and phase-locking limits.
    Bidelman G; Powers L
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 57(9):665-672. PubMed ID: 29764252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vowel decoding from single-trial speech-evoked electrophysiological responses: A feature-based machine learning approach.
    Yi HG; Xie Z; Reetzke R; Dimakis AG; Chandrasekaran B
    Brain Behav; 2017 Jun; 7(6):e00665. PubMed ID: 28638700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing native language neural commitment at the brainstem level: A cross-linguistic investigation of the association between frequency-following response and speech perception.
    Yu L; Zhang Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jan; 109():140-148. PubMed ID: 29246484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech Recognition in Noise in Adults and Children Who Speak English or Chinese as Their First Language.
    Schafer EC; Aoyama K; Ho T; Castillo P; Conlin J; Jones J; Thompson S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(10):885-897. PubMed ID: 30479261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in pitch height elicit both language-universal and language-dependent changes in neural representation of pitch in the brainstem and auditory cortex.
    Krishnan A; Suresh CH; Gandour JT
    Neuroscience; 2017 Mar; 346():52-63. PubMed ID: 28108254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cortical Correlates of the Auditory Frequency-Following and Onset Responses: EEG and fMRI Evidence.
    Coffey EBJ; Musacchia G; Zatorre RJ
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 37(4):830-838. PubMed ID: 28123019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intelligible speech encoded in the human brain stem frequency-following response.
    Galbraith GC; Arbagey PW; Branski R; Comerci N; Rector PM
    Neuroreport; 1995 Nov; 6(17):2363-7. PubMed ID: 8747154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Native language shapes automatic neural processing of speech.
    Intartaglia B; White-Schwoch T; Meunier C; Roman S; Kraus N; Schön D
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Aug; 89():57-65. PubMed ID: 27263123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interactive effects of linguistic abstraction and stimulus statistics in the online modulation of neural speech encoding.
    Lau JCY; Wong PCM; Chandrasekaran B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1020-1033. PubMed ID: 30565097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human Frequency Following Response: Neural Representation of Envelope and Temporal Fine Structure in Listeners with Normal Hearing and Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Krishnan A; Bartlett E
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):e91-e103. PubMed ID: 26583482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exponential Modeling of Frequency-Following Responses in American Neonates and Adults.
    Jeng FC; Nance B; Montgomery-Reagan K; Lin CD
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Feb; 29(2):125-134. PubMed ID: 29401060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of speech material on the band importance function for Mandarin Chinese.
    Du Y; Shen Y; Wu X; Chen J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jul; 146(1):445. PubMed ID: 31370645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Music training enhances the automatic neural processing of foreign speech sounds.
    Intartaglia B; White-Schwoch T; Kraus N; Schön D
    Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):12631. PubMed ID: 28974695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.