197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31042110)
1. Risk of Reaugmentation after Enterocystoplasty Using a Reconfigured Bowel Segment in Patients with Spina Bifida: A Bi-Institutional Cohort Study.
VanderBrink BA; Szymanski KM; Alam Z; Misseri R; DeFoor WR; Kaefer M; Reddy P; Rink RC; Minevich E; Cain MP
J Urol; 2019 Sep; 202(3):612-616. PubMed ID: 31042110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Additional Surgeries after Bladder Augmentation in Patients with Spina Bifida in the 21st Century.
Szymanski KM; Misseri R; Whittam B; Hollowell N; Hardacker RE; Swenson CR; Kaefer M; Rink RC; Cain MP
J Urol; 2020 Jun; 203(6):1207-1213. PubMed ID: 31951496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enterocystoplasty vs detrusorectomy: outcome in the adult with spina bifida.
Veenboer PW; Nadorp S; de Jong TP; Dik P; van Asbeck FW; Bosch JL; de Kort LM
J Urol; 2013 Mar; 189(3):1066-70. PubMed ID: 23017520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Delayed ileal-ileocystoplasty fistula formation: an unusual complication of augmentation enterocystoplasty.
Lin S; Hagger RW; Renani SM; Chung EA
J Pediatr Urol; 2012 Feb; 8(1):e16-8. PubMed ID: 21855415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Continuous local anesthetic infusion for children with spina bifida undergoing major reconstruction of the lower urinary tract.
Chalmers DJ; Bielsky A; Wild TT; Siparsky GL; Wilcox DT
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):72.e1-5. PubMed ID: 25819374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Augmentation cystoplasty rates at children's hospitals in the United States: a pediatric health information system database study.
Lendvay TS; Cowan CA; Mitchell MM; Joyner BD; Grady RW
J Urol; 2006 Oct; 176(4 Pt 2):1716-20. PubMed ID: 16945630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating outcomes of enterocystoplasty in patients with spina bifida: a review of the literature.
Scales CD; Wiener JS
J Urol; 2008 Dec; 180(6):2323-9. PubMed ID: 18930285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term functional outcomes of augmentation cystoplasty in adult spina bifida patients: A single-center experience in a multidisciplinary team.
Perrouin-Verbe MA; Léon P; Denys P; Mongiat-Artus P; Chartier-Kastler E; Phé V
Neurourol Urodyn; 2019 Jan; 38(1):330-337. PubMed ID: 30350892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Autologous cell seeded biodegradable scaffold for augmentation cystoplasty: phase II study in children and adolescents with spina bifida.
Joseph DB; Borer JG; De Filippo RE; Hodges SJ; McLorie GA
J Urol; 2014 May; 191(5):1389-95. PubMed ID: 24184366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bladder augmentation versus urinary diversion in patients with spina bifida in the United States.
Wiener JS; Antonelli J; Shea AM; Curtis LH; Schulman KA; Krupski TL; Scales CD
J Urol; 2011 Jul; 186(1):161-5. PubMed ID: 21575969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bladder Reconstruction Rates Differ among Centers Participating in National Spina Bifida Patient Registry.
Routh JC; Joseph DB; Liu T; Schechter MS; Thibadeau JK; Wallis MC; Ward EA; Wiener JS
J Urol; 2018 Jan; 199(1):268-273. PubMed ID: 28830753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mortality after bladder augmentation in children with spina bifida.
Szymanski KM; Misseri R; Whittam B; Adams CM; Kirkegaard J; King S; Kaefer M; Rink RC; Cain MP
J Urol; 2015 Feb; 193(2):643-8. PubMed ID: 25072178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Update on Urological Management of Spina Bifida from Prenatal Diagnosis to Adulthood.
Snow-Lisy DC; Yerkes EB; Cheng EY
J Urol; 2015 Aug; 194(2):288-96. PubMed ID: 25839383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bladder Augmentation (Enterocystoplasty): the Current State of a Historic Operation.
Budzyn J; Trinh H; Raffee S; Atiemo H
Curr Urol Rep; 2019 Jul; 20(9):50. PubMed ID: 31342172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nationwide Trends and Variations in Urological Surgical Interventions and Renal Outcome in Patients with Spina Bifida.
Wang HH; Lloyd JC; Wiener JS; Routh JC
J Urol; 2016 Apr; 195(4 Pt 2):1189-94. PubMed ID: 26926542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Augmentation ileocystoplasty in patients with neurogenic bladder due to spinal cord injury or spina bifida.
Nomura S; Ishido T; Tanaka K; Komiya A
Spinal Cord; 2002 Jan; 40(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 11821967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cumulative incidence of outcomes and urologic procedures after augmentation cystoplasty.
Schlomer BJ; Copp HL
J Pediatr Urol; 2014 Dec; 10(6):1043-50. PubMed ID: 24766857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retrospective analysis of bladder perforation risk in patients after augmentation cystoplasty using an extraperitoneal approach.
Tran WT; Boxley PJ; Wilcox DT; Vemulakonda VM; Wood D; Rove KO
J Pediatr Urol; 2023 Apr; 19(2):192.e1-192.e8. PubMed ID: 36585277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of extraperitoneal and intraperitoneal augmentation enterocystoplasty for neurogenic bladder in spinal cord injury patients.
Reyblat P; Chan KG; Josephson DY; Stein JP; Freeman JA; Grossfeld GD; Esrig D; Ginsberg DA
World J Urol; 2009 Feb; 27(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 19020878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simultaneous Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy for Bladder and Bowel Reconstruction.
Halleran DR; Wood RJ; Vilanova-Sanchez A; Rentea RM; Brown C; Fuchs M; Jayanthi VR; Ching C; Ahmad H; Gasior AC; Michalsky MP; Levitt MA; DaJusta D
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Dec; 28(12):1513-1516. PubMed ID: 29924670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
