These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31042771)

  • 21. Optimizing decision making for late-phase recovery one year after the Fukushima nuclear accident.
    Chen SY; Tenforde TS
    J Radiol Prot; 2012 Jun; 32(2):191-2. PubMed ID: 22674029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Advances in radiation detection technologies for responders.
    Unterweger MP; Pibida LS
    Health Phys; 2005 Nov; 89(5):485-7. PubMed ID: 16217191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Estimation of health hazards resulting from a radiological terrorist attack in a city.
    Andersson KG; Mikkelsen T; Astrup P; Thykier-Nielsen S; Jacobsen LH; Schou-Jensen L; Hoe SC; Nielsen SP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):297-307. PubMed ID: 18550515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Dosimetric system for assessing doses received by people occupationally exposed to external sources of ionizing radiation].
    Brodecki M; Domienik JU; Zmyślony M
    Med Pr; 2012; 63(5):607-17. PubMed ID: 23373330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Emergency Response to Radiological Releases: Have We Communicated Effectively to the First Responder Communities to Prepare Them to Safely Manage These Incidents?
    Ingram RJ
    Health Phys; 2018 Feb; 114(2):208-213. PubMed ID: 30086017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Enhanced Radioactive Material Source Security.
    Klinger JG
    Health Phys; 2016 Feb; 110(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 26717170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Key factors in imprecision in radiological emergency response assessments using the NAME model.
    Haywood SM; Bedwell P; Hort MC
    J Radiol Prot; 2010 Mar; 30(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 20220209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A framework for the systematic realisation of phenomena for enhanced sensing of radiological and nuclear materials, and radiation.
    Healy MJ
    J Radiol Prot; 2015 Sep; 35(3):649-58. PubMed ID: 26270745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Risks to Ireland from incidents at Sellafield.
    Hone C
    J Radiol Prot; 2013 Mar; 33(1):247-9. PubMed ID: 23455004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Requirements for estimation of doses from contaminants dispersed by a 'dirty bomb' explosion in an urban area.
    Andersson KG; Mikkelsen T; Astrup P; Thykier-Nielsen S; Jacobsen LH; Hoe SC; Nielsen SP
    J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1005-11. PubMed ID: 19427717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Exercise Maritime Response (EXMR): lessons learned for population monitoring and communications.
    Kramer GH; Johnson S; Hauck B; Capello K; Quayle D
    Health Phys; 2007 May; 92(5 Suppl):S112-22. PubMed ID: 17440322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Radioecological approaches to ranking radiation dangerous objects].
    Korenkov IP; Lashchenova TN; Veselov EI; Shandala NK; Maksimova OA
    Gig Sanit; 2011; (4):16-20. PubMed ID: 21899094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Application of the Commission's recommendations: the 2013-2017 Committee 4 programme of work.
    Lochard J
    Ann ICRP; 2015 Jun; 44(1 Suppl):33-46. PubMed ID: 25856573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A study on dose control for Tokaimura criticality accident termination.
    Kanamori M; Suto T; Tanaka K; Takada J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jul; 146(1-3):42-5. PubMed ID: 21498854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Is ICRP guidance on the use of reference levels consistent?
    Hedemann-Jensen P; McEwan AC
    J Radiol Prot; 2011 Dec; 31(4):431-44. PubMed ID: 22089983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Iodine prophylaxis to prevent radiation damage following nuclear disasters].
    Frankfort SV; Roos JC; Franssen EJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Aug; 147(34):1641-4. PubMed ID: 12966630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The role of the health physicist in nuclear security.
    Waller EJ; van Maanen J
    Health Phys; 2015 Apr; 108(4):468-76. PubMed ID: 25706142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Analysing an accident related to orphan sources including dose assessment.
    Mianji FA; Rastkhah N; Kardan MR; Mehdizadeh S; Babakhani A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(3):394-7. PubMed ID: 17018544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Details in relation to emergency planning in case of undesired dispersion of radioactivity].
    Hardeman F
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2005; 67(5-6):341-51. PubMed ID: 16408830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Medical training for nuclear and radiological events: the "atomic age" returns.
    Dallas CE
    Disaster Med Public Health Prep; 2013 Oct; 7(5):441-2. PubMed ID: 24274122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.