These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31044396)

  • 1. Linguistic features of fragrances: The role of grammatical gender and gender associations.
    Speed LJ; Majid A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):2063-2077. PubMed ID: 31044396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The language of smell: Connecting linguistic and psychophysical properties of odor descriptors.
    Iatropoulos G; Herman P; Lansner A; Karlgren J; Larsson M; Olofsson JK
    Cognition; 2018 Sep; 178():37-49. PubMed ID: 29763790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is That "Mr." or "Ms." Lemon? An Investigation of Grammatical and Semantic Gender on the Perception of Household Odorants.
    White TL; Cunningham CM; Zampini ML
    Brain Sci; 2022 Sep; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 36291247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Duality of Smell: Route-Dependent Effects on Olfactory Perception and Language.
    Pellegrino R; Hörberg T; Olofsson J; Luckett CR
    Chem Senses; 2021 Jan; 46():. PubMed ID: 34007980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. No grammatical gender effect on affective ratings: evidence from Italian and German languages.
    Montefinese M; Ambrosini E; Roivainen E
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Jun; 33(4):848-854. PubMed ID: 29873624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lady Liberty and Godfather Death as candidates for linguistic relativity? Scrutinizing the gender congruency effect on personified allegories with explicit and implicit measures.
    Bender A; Beller S; Klauer KC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(1):48-64. PubMed ID: 25849810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flexing Gender Perception: Brain Potentials Reveal the Cognitive Permeability of Grammatical Information.
    Sato S; Casaponsa A; Athanasopoulos P
    Cogn Sci; 2020 Sep; 44(9):e12884. PubMed ID: 32939822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speaker sex influences processing of grammatical gender.
    Vitevitch MS; Sereno J; Jongman A; Goldstein R
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e79701. PubMed ID: 24236155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Superior olfactory language and cognition in odor-color synaesthesia.
    Speed LJ; Majid A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):468-481. PubMed ID: 28816480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating linguistic relativity through bilingualism: the case of grammatical gender.
    Kousta ST; Vinson DP; Vigliocco G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jul; 34(4):843-58. PubMed ID: 18605873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Familiarity influences odor memory stability.
    Stevenson RJ; Mahmut MK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Aug; 20(4):754-9. PubMed ID: 23341245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How Persistent are Grammatical Gender Effects? The Case of German and Tamil.
    Sedlmeier P; Tipandjan A; Jänchen A
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Apr; 45(2):317-36. PubMed ID: 25669752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An Exception to Mental Simulation: No Evidence for Embodied Odor Language.
    Speed LJ; Majid A
    Cogn Sci; 2018 May; 42(4):1146-1178. PubMed ID: 29442364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Grammatical gender vs. natural gender in French Williams syndrome.
    Ibernon L; Boloh Y
    Res Dev Disabil; 2010; 31(6):1291-8. PubMed ID: 20691569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Odor-color associations differ with verbal descriptors for odors: A comparison of three linguistically diverse groups.
    de Valk JM; Wnuk E; Huisman JLA; Majid A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1171-1179. PubMed ID: 27783225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Grammatical gender and linguistic relativity: A systematic review.
    Samuel S; Cole G; Eacott MJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Dec; 26(6):1767-1786. PubMed ID: 31429058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Grammatical gender affects gender perception: Evidence for the structural-feedback hypothesis.
    Sato S; Athanasopoulos P
    Cognition; 2018 Jul; 176():220-231. PubMed ID: 29605631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Superior Identification of Component Odors in a Mixture Is Linked to Autistic Traits in Children and Adults.
    Walker SC; Williams K; Moore DJ
    Chem Senses; 2020 May; 45(5):391-399. PubMed ID: 32249289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the semantic content of grammatical gender and its impact on the representation of human referents.
    Irmen L; Kurovskaja J
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(5):367-75. PubMed ID: 20178923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two routes to grammatical gender: evidence from Hebrew.
    Gollan TH; Frost R
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2001 Nov; 30(6):627-51. PubMed ID: 11913850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.