These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31044948)

  • 1. Comparison of refractive error measurements by three different models of autorefractors and subjective refraction in young adults.
    Wosik J; Patrzykont M; Pniewski J
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2019 Apr; 36(4):B1-B6. PubMed ID: 31044948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of Viewing Conditions and Vision Anomalies on Accuracy and Dynamics of Noncycloplegic Autorefraction.
    Kiermasz J; Sobol M; Pniewski J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2022 Dec; 99(12):844-852. PubMed ID: 36594753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical Accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 Autorefractor.
    Paudel N; Adhikari S; Thakur A; Shrestha B; Loughman J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 31107837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of spherical equivalent refraction and astigmatism measured with three different models of autorefractors.
    Gwiazda J; Weber C
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jan; 81(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 14747762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic accuracy and variability of autorefraction by the Tracey Visual Function Analyzer and the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001 in relation to subjective refraction.
    Cleary G; Spalton DJ; Patel PM; Lin PF; Marshall J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Mar; 29(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 19236587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Refractive Measures of Three Autorefractors in Children and Adolescents.
    Xiong S; Lv M; Zou H; Zhu J; Lu L; Zhang B; Deng J; Yao C; He X; Xu X
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Sep; 94(9):894-902. PubMed ID: 28816868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Refractive outcomes of table-mounted and hand-held auto-refractometers in children: an observational cross-sectional study.
    Karabulut M; Karabulut S; Karalezli A
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Dec; 21(1):424. PubMed ID: 34879852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of refraction--a literature review.
    Goss DA; Grosvenor T
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):619-30. PubMed ID: 8942135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An alternative clinical routine for subjective refraction based on power vectors with trial frames.
    María Revert A; Conversa MA; Albarrán Diego C; Micó V
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 28030877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of open-field autorefraction, closed-field autorefraction, and retinoscopy for refractive measurements of children and adolescents in Taiwan.
    Kuo YC; Wang JH; Chiu CJ
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2020 Aug; 119(8):1251-1258. PubMed ID: 32354691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of autorefraction in an adult Indian population.
    Kumar RS; Moe CA; Kumar D; Rackenchath MV; A V SD; Nagaraj S; Wittberg DM; Stamper RL; Keenan JD
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251583. PubMed ID: 34010350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retinoscopy/autorefraction: which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?
    Jorge J; Queirós A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 15630406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of six different autorefractor designs on the precision and accuracy of refractive error measurement.
    Venkataraman AP; Brautaset R; Domínguez-Vicent A
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0278269. PubMed ID: 36441778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design and Clinical Evaluation of a Handheld Wavefront Autorefractor.
    Durr NJ; Dave SR; Vera-Diaz FA; Lim D; Dorronsoro C; Marcos S; Thorn F; Lage E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1140-7. PubMed ID: 26580271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001/Grand Seiko WR-5100K autorefractor.
    Davies LN; Mallen EA; Wolffsohn JS; Gilmartin B
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Apr; 80(4):320-4. PubMed ID: 12692490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hand-Held Nidek versus Table-Mounted Huvitz Autorefractors and Their Agreement with Subjective Refraction in Adults.
    Sayed KM; Alsmman AH; Mostafa EM
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2021; 15():1391-1401. PubMed ID: 33833497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
    Pesudovs K; Parker KE; Cheng H; Applegate RA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical Evaluation Of a 0.05 D-step Binocular Wavefront Optometer in Young Adults in China.
    Cheng M; Chen X; Lei Y; Li B; Jiang Y; Xu Y; Zhou X; Wang X
    Clin Exp Optom; 2024 May; 107(4):395-401. PubMed ID: 36794379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of autorefractor performance.
    Pesudovs K; Weisinger HS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jul; 81(7):554-8. PubMed ID: 15252356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of refractive error measures by the IRX3 aberrometer and autorefraction.
    McCullough SJ; Little JA; Breslin KM; Saunders KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1183-90. PubMed ID: 25192432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.