These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31045825)
1. A comparison of surgical outcomes between robot and laparoscopy-assisted adenomyomectomy. Shim JI; Jo EH; Kim M; Kim MK; Kim ML; Yun BS; Seong SJ; Jung YW Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 May; 98(18):e15466. PubMed ID: 31045825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive adenomyomectomy via a laparoscopic-assisted approach compared to a laparoscopic or laparotomic approach. Ahn JW; You SG; Go EB; Lee SH; Kim JS; Cho HJ; Roh HJ Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 60(6):1005-1010. PubMed ID: 34794729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Clinical and Reproductive Outcomes between Adenomyomectomy and Myomectomy. Hlinecka K; Mara M; Boudova B; Lisa Z; Richtarova A; Kuzel D J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Mar; 29(3):392-400. PubMed ID: 34670164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Uterine-Sparing Laparoscopic Pelvic Plexus Ablation, Uterine Artery Occlusion, and Partial Adenomyomectomy for Adenomyosis. Yang W; Liu M; Liu L; Jiang C; Chen L; Qu X; Cheng Z J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):940-945. PubMed ID: 28552655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-Term Efficacy of Laparoscopic or Robotic Adenomyomectomy with or without Medical Treatment for Severely Symptomatic Adenomyosis. Chong GO; Lee YH; Hong DG; Cho YL; Lee YS Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2016; 81(4):346-52. PubMed ID: 26894488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Adenomyomectomy for Patients Who Want to Preserve Fertility. Chung YJ; Kang SY; Choi MR; Cho HH; Kim JH; Kim MR Yonsei Med J; 2016 Nov; 57(6):1531-4. PubMed ID: 27593887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical Efficacy among Laparoscopic Ultrasonic Dissectors in Adenomyosis. Ji L; Jin L; Zheng S; Shao M; Cui D; Hu M Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2023; 88(3):168-173. PubMed ID: 36940680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel technique for myometrial defect closure after robot-assisted laparoscopic adenomyomectomy: A retrospective cohort study. Hijazi A; Chung YJ; Sinan N; Kang H; Ko M; Lee S; Song JY; Kim MR Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jan; 61(1):75-79. PubMed ID: 35181050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perioperative Outcomes of Myomectomy for Extreme Myoma Burden: Comparison of Surgical Approaches. Jansen LJ; Clark NV; Dmello M; Gu X; Einarsson JI; Cohen SL J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1095-1103. PubMed ID: 30391510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison between reduced-port robotic surgery and multiport robot-assisted laparoscopy for myomectomy. Nam SH; Paek J; Choi C; Nam SH; Kim WY Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Jun; 213():53-57. PubMed ID: 28426944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic Surgery for Focal Adenomyosis. Kwack JY; Kwon YS JSLS; 2017; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 28642638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conservative surgery of uterine adenomyosis via laparoscopic versus laparotomic approach in a single institution. Kwack JY; Im KS; Kwon YS J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 29845687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advanced Laparoscopic Adenomyomectomy Technique for Focal Uterine Adenomyosis by Three-step Approach. Kwack JY; Seo M; Hong JS; Im KS; Kwon YS JSLS; 2022; 26(4):. PubMed ID: 36452905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility, Safety, and Prediction of Complications for Minimally Invasive Myomectomy in Women With Large and Numerous Myomata. Vargas MV; Moawad GN; Sievers C; Opoku-Anane J; Marfori CQ; Tyan P; Robinson JK J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):315-322. PubMed ID: 27939896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy for deep intramural myomas. Kang SY; Jeung IC; Chung YJ; Kim HK; Lee CR; Mansukhani TS; Kim MR Int J Med Robot; 2017 Jun; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 26989866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy. Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Hanna MH; Carmichael JC; Pigazzi A; Stamos MJ; Mills S Surg Endosc; 2016 Jul; 30(7):2792-8. PubMed ID: 26487196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic assisted vs laparoscopic and/or open myomectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical evidence. Iavazzo C; Mamais I; Gkegkes ID Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Jul; 294(1):5-17. PubMed ID: 26969650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive treatment of colorectal liver metastases: does robotic surgery provide any technical advantages over laparoscopy? A multicenter analysis from the IGoMILS (Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery) registry. Masetti M; Fallani G; Ratti F; Ferrero A; Giuliante F; Cillo U; Guglielmi A; Ettorre GM; Torzilli G; Vincenti L; Ercolani G; Cipressi C; Lombardi R; Aldrighetti L; Jovine E Updates Surg; 2022 Apr; 74(2):535-545. PubMed ID: 35099776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of robotic assisted laparoscopic myomectomy with barbed sutures and traditional laparoscopic myomectomy with barbed sutures. Chen YC; Lin HH; Hsiao SM Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Oct; 57(5):709-712. PubMed ID: 30342656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility of Reduced-Port Robotic Surgery for Myomectomy with the da Vinci Surgical System. Kim JJ; Choi C; Nam SH; Kim WY J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):926-931. PubMed ID: 28487176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]