142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31045839)
1. Diagnostic performance of biomarkers for ovarian cancer: Protocol for an overview, evidence mapping, and adjusted indirect comparisons.
Hua J; Liu J; Hua M; Cai R; Li M; Wang J; Wang J;
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 May; 98(18):e15508. PubMed ID: 31045839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An overview protocol of biomarkers for breast cancer detection.
Sheng Z; Wang J; Li M; Luo X; Cai R; Zhang M;
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(24):e16024. PubMed ID: 31192953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of value of biomarkers in diagnosing lung cancer: An overview of systematic reviews protocol.
Wu F; Wang H; Tao H; Huang H; Zhang L; Wu D; Wan Y;
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 May; 98(19):e15525. PubMed ID: 31083197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The value of biomarkers in colorectal cancer: Protocol for an overview and a secondary analysis of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
Wang J; Liang W; Wang X; Min G; Chen W; Wang H; Yao N; Wang J;
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(24):e16034. PubMed ID: 31192959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomarkers for detecting malignant pleural mesothelioma: Protocol for a reanalysis of published data based on systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
Zan X; Wang Y; Shi J; Zhao L; Zhao Y; Liu R; Zhou Y; Wan Y;
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(24):e16028. PubMed ID: 31192957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomarkers for detecting prostate cancer: Protocol for an umbrella review with integrated network meta-analysis.
Jia J; Sun Y; Ren J; Li M; Wang J; Li H;
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jul; 98(30):e16517. PubMed ID: 31348264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and endorectal ultrasonography for detecting lymph node involvement in patients with rectal cancer: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews.
Wang X; Gao Y; Li J; Wu J; Wang B; Ma X; Tian J; Shen M; Wang J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(43):e12899. PubMed ID: 30412090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic value of seven biomarkers for breast cancer: an overview with evidence mapping and indirect comparisons of diagnostic test accuracy.
Gao Y; Liu M; Shi S; Sun Y; Li M; Zhang M; Sheng Z; Zhang J; Tian J;
Clin Exp Med; 2020 Feb; 20(1):97-108. PubMed ID: 31894424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 for diagnosing sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
Li XJ; Tan EL; Zhao CP; Yan J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(24):e16019. PubMed ID: 31192950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of five common tumour biomarkers and CA19-9 for pancreatic cancer: a protocol for a network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.
Ge L; Pan B; Song F; Ma J; Zeraatkar D; Zhou J; Tian J
BMJ Open; 2017 Dec; 7(12):e018175. PubMed ID: 29282264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Informant-based screening tools for diagnosis of dementia, an overview of systematic reviews of test accuracy studies protocol.
Taylor-Rowan M; Nafisi S; Patel A; Burton JK; Quinn TJ
Syst Rev; 2020 Nov; 9(1):271. PubMed ID: 33243282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Five common tumor biomarkers and CEA for diagnosing early gastric cancer: A protocol for a network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.
Shen M; Wang H; Wei K; Zhang J; You C
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 May; 97(19):e0577. PubMed ID: 29742692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What determines the effects and costs of breast cancer screening? A protocol of a systematic review of reviews.
Mandrik O; Ekwunife OI; Zielonke N; Meheus F; Severens JL; Lhachimi SK; Murillo R
Syst Rev; 2017 Jun; 6(1):122. PubMed ID: 28659183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic and prognostic role of HE4 expression in multiple carcinomas: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kumarasamy C; Madhav MR; Sabarimurugan S; Lakhotiya K; Pandey V; Priyadharshini T; Baxi S; Gothandam KM; Jayaraj R
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jul; 98(28):e15336. PubMed ID: 31305389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The efficacy and safety of platinum-based chemotherapy for ovarian cancer in pregnancy: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang B; Jia Y; Liu L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Nov; 101(47):e31954. PubMed ID: 36451508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis of narrow band imaging endoscopy in detection of early gastric cancer.
Zhang L; Liu XY; Zhong G; Xin Z; Sun XY; Wang ZY
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Aug; 99(33):e21420. PubMed ID: 32871989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA).
McGrath TA; Moher D; McInnes MDF
Syst Rev; 2019 Jul; 8(1):166. PubMed ID: 31296260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance imaging for the non-invasive diagnosis in patients with ovarian cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Su Y; Deng L; Yang L; Yuan X; Xia W; Liu P
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Dec; 99(50):e23551. PubMed ID: 33327306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
