These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3104607)

  • 1. Statistical properties of molecular tree construction methods under the neutral mutation model.
    Tateno Y; Tajima F
    J Mol Evol; 1986; 23(4):354-61. PubMed ID: 3104607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. II. Gene frequency data.
    Nei M; Tajima F; Tateno Y
    J Mol Evol; 1983; 19(2):153-70. PubMed ID: 6571220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. I. Distantly related species.
    Tateno Y; Nei M; Tajima F
    J Mol Evol; 1982; 18(6):387-404. PubMed ID: 7175956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simple method for constructing phylogenetic trees from distance matrices.
    Li WH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1981 Feb; 78(2):1085-9. PubMed ID: 6940127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nonuniformity of nucleotide substitution rates in molecular evolution: computer simulation and analysis of 5S ribosomal RNA sequences.
    Manske CL; Chapman DJ
    J Mol Evol; 1987; 26(3):226-51. PubMed ID: 3129569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sources of error inherent in species-tree estimation: impact of mutational and coalescent effects on accuracy and implications for choosing among different methods.
    Huang H; He Q; Kubatko LS; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2010 Oct; 59(5):573-83. PubMed ID: 20833951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.
    Saitou N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1987 Jul; 4(4):406-25. PubMed ID: 3447015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site.
    Tateno Y; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8170367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of phylogenetic trees estimated from DNA sequence data.
    Sourdis J; Krimbas C
    Mol Biol Evol; 1987 Mar; 4(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 3447006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Complete families of linear invariants for some stochastic models of sequence evolution, with and without the molecular clock assumption.
    Hendy MD; Penny D
    J Comput Biol; 1996; 3(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 8697236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nucleotide substitution models and estimation of phylogeny.
    Håstad O; Björklund M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1998 Nov; 15(11):1381-9. PubMed ID: 12572602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The gene tree delusion.
    Springer MS; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jan; 94(Pt A):1-33. PubMed ID: 26238460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maximum likelihood estimates of species trees: how accuracy of phylogenetic inference depends upon the divergence history and sampling design.
    McCormack JE; Huang H; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2009 Oct; 58(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 20525604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Twisted trees and inconsistency of tree estimation when gaps are treated as missing data - The impact of model mis-specification in distance corrections.
    McTavish EJ; Steel M; Holder MT
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2015 Dec; 93():289-95. PubMed ID: 26256643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation.
    Yang Z; Goldman N; Friday A
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):316-24. PubMed ID: 8170371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relative efficiencies of the maximum parsimony and distance-matrix methods in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree.
    Sourdis J; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1988 May; 5(3):298-311. PubMed ID: 3386530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The consistency of several phylogeny-inference methods under varying evolutionary rates.
    DeBry RW
    Mol Biol Evol; 1992 May; 9(3):537-51. PubMed ID: 1584019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical properties of neutral evolution.
    Bastolla U; Porto M; Roman HE; Vendruscolo M
    J Mol Evol; 2003; 57 Suppl 1():S103-19. PubMed ID: 15008407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny.
    Russo CA; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Mar; 13(3):525-36. PubMed ID: 8742641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quartet-mapping, a generalization of the likelihood-mapping procedure.
    Nieselt-Struwe K; von Haeseler A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2001 Jul; 18(7):1204-19. PubMed ID: 11420361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.