These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Ultrasound field characterization using synthetic schlieren tomography. Pulkkinen A; Leskinen JJ; Tiihonen A J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4600. PubMed ID: 28679248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Simple Technique for Visualizing Ultrasound Fields Without Schlieren Optics. Kudo N Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 41(7):2071-81. PubMed ID: 25842256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nonlinear estimation of pressure projection of ultrasound fields in background-oriented schlieren imaging. Koponen E; Leskinen J; Tarvainen T; Pulkkinen A J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2022 Apr; 39(4):552-562. PubMed ID: 35471377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An imaging model incorporating ultrasonic transducer properties for three-dimensional optoacoustic tomography. Wang K; Ermilov SA; Su R; Brecht HP; Oraevsky AA; Anastasio MA IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Feb; 30(2):203-14. PubMed ID: 20813634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multi-modal acousto-optic/ultrasound imaging of ex vivo liver tumors at 790 nm using a Sn2 P2 S6 wavefront adaptive holographic setup. Laudereau JB; À La Guillaume EB; Servois V; Mariani P; Grabar AA; Tanter M; Gennisson JL; Ramaz F J Biophotonics; 2015 May; 8(5):429-36. PubMed ID: 25236956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Method to optimize the placement of a single-element transducer for transcranial focused ultrasound. Park TY; Pahk KJ; Kim H Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Oct; 179():104982. PubMed ID: 31443869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Increased SNR in acousto-optic imaging via coded ultrasound transmission. Levi A; Monin S; Hahamovich E; Lev A; Sfez BG; Rosenthal A Opt Lett; 2020 May; 45(10):2858-2861. PubMed ID: 32412486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simulation of x-ray-induced acoustic imaging for absolute dosimetry: Accuracy of image reconstruction methods. Forghani F; Mahl A; Patton TJ; Jones BL; Borden MA; Westerly DC; Altunbas C; Miften M; Thomas DH Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1280-1290. PubMed ID: 31828781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An iterative method for the computation of nonlinear, wide-angle, pulsed acoustic fields of medical diagnostic transducers. Huijssen J; Verweij MD J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 20058948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A reliability study of light refractive tomography utilized for noninvasive measurement of ultrasound pressure fields. Chen L; Rupitsch SJ; Lerch R IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 May; 59(5):915-27. PubMed ID: 22622976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrasonic power measurement system based on acousto-optic interaction. He L; Zhu F; Chen Y; Duan K; Lin X; Pan Y; Tao J Rev Sci Instrum; 2016 May; 87(5):054903. PubMed ID: 27250458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Background-oriented schlieren sensitivity in terms of geometrical parameters of measurement setup. Koponen E; Leskinen J; Tarvainen T; Pulkkinen A J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Dec; 154(6):3726-3736. PubMed ID: 38088747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An automatic compact Schlieren imaging system for ultrasound transducer testing. Caliano G; Savoia AS; Iula A IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Sep; 59(9):2102-10. PubMed ID: 23007785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasound-mediated biophotonic imaging: a review of acousto-optical tomography and photo-acoustic tomography. Wang LV Dis Markers; 2003-2004; 19(2-3):123-38. PubMed ID: 15096709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]