These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31047165)
1. Mammographic Breast Density: Comparison Across Women with Conclusive and Inconclusive Mammography Reports. Ekpo EU; Egbe NO; Egom AE; McEntee MF J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2016 Mar; 47(1):55-59. PubMed ID: 31047165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How mammographic breast density affects radiologists' visual search patterns. Al Mousa DS; Brennan PC; Ryan EA; Lee WB; Tan J; Mello-Thoms C Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1386-93. PubMed ID: 25172414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of mammographic technologists on radiologists' ability to interpret screening mammograms in community practice. Henderson LM; Benefield T; Marsh MW; Schroeder BF; Durham DD; Yankaskas BC; Bowling JM Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):278-89. PubMed ID: 25435185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of Breast Reader Assessment Strategy on mammographic radiologists' test reading performance. Suleiman WI; Rawashdeh MA; Lewis SJ; McEntee MF; Lee W; Tapia K; Brennan PC J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Jun; 60(3):352-8. PubMed ID: 27062490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammographic density and cancer detection: does digital imaging challenge our current understanding? Al Mousa DS; Mello-Thoms C; Ryan EA; Lee WB; Pietrzyk MW; Reed WM; Heard R; Poulos A; Tan J; Li Y; Brennan PC Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1377-85. PubMed ID: 25097013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An investigation into the mammographic appearances of missed breast cancers when recall rates are reduced. Mohd Norsuddin N; Mello-Thoms C; Reed W; Rickard M; Lewis S Br J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 90(1076):20170048. PubMed ID: 28621548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical Utility of Breast MRI in the Diagnosis of Malignancy After Inconclusive or Equivocal Mammographic Diagnostic Evaluation. Giess CS; Chikarmane SA; Sippo DA; Birdwell RL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1378-1385. PubMed ID: 28267372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determinants of volumetric breast density in Chilean premenopausal women. Pereira A; Garmendia ML; Uauy R; Neira P; Lopez-Arana S; Malkov S; Shepherd J Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Apr; 162(2):343-352. PubMed ID: 28132392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical comparison of a novel breast DXA technique to mammographic density. Shepherd JA; Herve L; Landau J; Fan B; Kerlikowske K; Cummings SR Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1490-8. PubMed ID: 16752583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammographic Breast Density as a Predictor of Radiological Findings Requiring Further Investigation. Nevler A; Shabtai E; Rosin D; Hoffman A; Gutman M; Shabtai M Isr Med Assoc J; 2016 Jan; 18(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 26964277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preliminary investigation of mammographic density among women in Riyadh: association with breast cancer risk factors and implications for screening practices. Albeshan SM; Hossain SZ; Mackey MG; Peat JK; Al Tahan FM; Brennan PC Clin Imaging; 2019; 54():138-147. PubMed ID: 30639525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of a subsidised mammographic screening programme in Malaysia, a middle-income Asian country. Lee M; Mariapun S; Rajaram N; Teo SH; Yip CH BMC Public Health; 2017 Jan; 17(1):127. PubMed ID: 28129762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is breast MRI helpful in the evaluation of inconclusive mammographic findings? Moy L; Elias K; Patel V; Lee J; Babb JS; Toth HK; Mercado CL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):986-93. PubMed ID: 19770320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammographic breast density: Predictive value for pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Elsamany S; Alzahrani A; Abozeed WN; Rasmy A; Farooq MU; Elbiomy MA; Rawah E; Alsaleh K; Abdel-Aziz NM Breast; 2015 Oct; 24(5):576-81. PubMed ID: 26071795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan. Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammographic Density Distribution in Ras Al Khaimah (RAK): Relationships with Demographic and Reproductive Factors. Albeshan SM; Hossain SZ; Mackey MG; Demchig D; Peat JK; Brennan PC Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Jun; 19(6):1607-1616. PubMed ID: 29936786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate. Lee CH; Philpotts LE; Horvath LJ; Tocino I Radiology; 1999 Jul; 212(1):189-94. PubMed ID: 10405741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using breast radiographers' reports as a second opinion for radiologists' readings of microcalcifications in digital mammography. Tanaka R; Takamori M; Uchiyama Y; Nishikawa RM; Shiraishi J Br J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 88(1047):20140565. PubMed ID: 25536443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]