128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31047180)
1. Analysis of Dosimetric Impacts of Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Based Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Planning.
Noufal MP; Abdullah KK; Niyas P; Sankaran TS; Sasindaran PR
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2016 Jun; 47(2):160-170. PubMed ID: 31047180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of kV-CBCT based 3D dose calculation accuracy and its validation using delivery fluence derived dose metrics in Head and Neck Cancer.
Shinde P; Jadhav A; Shankar V; Gupta KK; Dhoble NS; Dhoble SJ
Phys Med; 2022 Apr; 96():32-45. PubMed ID: 35217498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetric feasibility of cone-beam CT-based treatment planning compared to CT-based treatment planning.
Yoo S; Yin FF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Dec; 66(5):1553-61. PubMed ID: 17056197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dose calculation accuracy of different image value to density tables for cone-beam CT planning in head & neck and pelvic localizations.
Barateau A; Garlopeau C; Cugny A; De Figueiredo BH; Dupin C; Caron J; Antoine M
Phys Med; 2015 Mar; 31(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 25595131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Study of Variation in Dose Calculation Accuracy Between kV Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and kV fan-Beam Computed Tomography.
Kaliyaperumal V; Raphael CJ; Varghese KM; Gopu P; Sivakumar S; Boban M; Raj NAN; Senthilnathan K; Babu PR
J Med Phys; 2017; 42(3):171-180. PubMed ID: 28974864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility of CBCT-based dose with a patient-specific stepwise HU-to-density curve to determine time of replanning.
Chen S; Le Q; Mutaf Y; Lu W; Nichols EM; Yi BY; Leven T; Prado KL; D'Souza WD
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):64-69. PubMed ID: 28703475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of CBCT-based dose calculation methods in head and neck cancer radiotherapy: from Hounsfield unit to density calibration curve to deep learning.
Barateau A; De Crevoisier R; Largent A; Mylona E; Perichon N; Castelli J; Chajon E; Acosta O; Simon A; Nunes JC; Lafond C
Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):4683-4693. PubMed ID: 32654160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of on-board imager cone beam CT hounsfield units for treatment planning using rigid image registration.
Rafic M; Ravindran P
J Cancer Res Ther; 2015; 11(4):690-6. PubMed ID: 26881503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dual-energy imaging method to improve the image quality and the accuracy of dose calculation for cone-beam computed tomography.
Men K; Dai J; Chen X; Li M; Zhang K; Huang P
Phys Med; 2017 Apr; 36():110-118. PubMed ID: 28410679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correction for 'artificial' electron disequilibrium due to cone-beam CT density errors: implications for on-line adaptive stereotactic body radiation therapy of lung.
Disher B; Hajdok G; Wang A; Craig J; Gaede S; Battista JJ
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(12):4157-74. PubMed ID: 23689060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cone beam CT for QA of synthetic CT in MRI only for prostate patients.
Palmér E; Persson E; Ambolt P; Gustafsson C; Gunnlaugsson A; Olsson LE
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):44-52. PubMed ID: 30182461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of dose calculation on iterative CBCT for head and neck radiotherapy.
Washio H; Ohira S; Funama Y; Ueda Y; Isono M; Inui S; Miyazaki M; Teshima T
Phys Med; 2021 Jun; 86():106-112. PubMed ID: 34102546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of a deformable image registration technique for cone beam CT-based dose verification.
Moteabbed M; Sharp GC; Wang Y; Trofimov A; Efstathiou JA; Lu HM
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):196-205. PubMed ID: 25563260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of Influence of Errors in Angular Settings of Couch and Collimator on the Dosimetric and Radiobiological Parameters in VMAT Plans.
Noufal MP; Abdullah KK; Niyas P; Nambiar VR
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2017 Jun; 48(2):166-177. PubMed ID: 31047365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extended localization and adaptive dose calculation using HU corrected cone beam CT: Phantom study.
Rafic KM; Amalan S; Timothy Peace BS; Ravindran BP
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2018; 23(2):126-135. PubMed ID: 29556141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ScatterNet: A convolutional neural network for cone-beam CT intensity correction.
Hansen DC; Landry G; Kamp F; Li M; Belka C; Parodi K; Kurz C
Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):4916-4926. PubMed ID: 30199101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Machine log file-based dose verification using novel iterative CBCT reconstruction algorithm in commercial software during volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer patients.
Inui S; Nishio T; Ueda Y; Ohira S; Ueda H; Washio H; Ono S; Miyazaki M; Koizumi M; Konishi K
Phys Med; 2021 Nov; 92():24-31. PubMed ID: 34837857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dose calculation accuracy using cone-beam CT (CBCT) for pelvic adaptive radiotherapy.
Guan H; Dong H
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6239-50. PubMed ID: 19794241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the benefit of PBS vs. VMAT dose distributions in terms of dosimetric sparing and robustness against inter-fraction anatomical changes for pediatric abdominal tumors.
Guerreiro F; Zachiu C; Seravalli E; Ribeiro CO; Janssens GO; Ries M; de Senneville BD; Maduro JH; Brouwer CL; Korevaar EW; Knopf AC; Raaymakers BW
Radiother Oncol; 2019 Sep; 138():158-165. PubMed ID: 31302390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility evaluation of kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography dose calculation following scatter correction: investigations of phantom and representative tumor sites.
Meng H; Meng X; Qiu Q; Zhang Y; Ming X; Li Q; Wang K; Zhang R; Duan J
Transl Cancer Res; 2021 Aug; 10(8):3726-3738. PubMed ID: 35116673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
