199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31047904)
1. Contemporary Trends in Magnetic Resonance Imaging at the Time of Prostate Biopsy: Results from a Large Private Insurance Database.
Kim SP; Karnes RJ; Mwangi R; Van Houten H; Gross CP; Gershman B; Leapman MS; Shah ND
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jan; 7(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 31047904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; Schoots IG; Chiu PK; Osses DF; Tijsterman JD; Beerlage HP; Mannaerts CK; Schimmöller L; Albers P; Arsov C
Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 30082150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The FUTURE Trial: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial on Target Biopsy Techniques Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsies.
Wegelin O; Exterkate L; van der Leest M; Kummer JA; Vreuls W; de Bruin PC; Bosch JLHR; Barentsz JO; Somford DM; van Melick HHE
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):582-590. PubMed ID: 30522912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adoption of Prebiopsy Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Men Undergoing Prostate Biopsy in the United States.
Liu W; Patil D; Howard DH; Moore RH; Wang H; Sanda MG; Filson CP
Urology; 2018 Jul; 117():57-63. PubMed ID: 29679601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial.
Tonttila PP; Lantto J; Pääkkö E; Piippo U; Kauppila S; Lammentausta E; Ohtonen P; Vaarala MH
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 26033153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prebiopsy Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Detecting and Ruling out Gleason 7-10 Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 2(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 31200846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing Three Different Techniques for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies: A Systematic Review of In-bore versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound fusion versus Cognitive Registration. Is There a Preferred Technique?
Wegelin O; van Melick HHE; Hooft L; Bosch JLHR; Reitsma HB; Barentsz JO; Somford DM
Eur Urol; 2017 Apr; 71(4):517-531. PubMed ID: 27568655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship Between Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Biopsy Indication, and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy Outcomes.
Meng X; Rosenkrantz AB; Mendhiratta N; Fenstermaker M; Huang R; Wysock JS; Bjurlin MA; Marshall S; Deng FM; Zhou M; Melamed J; Huang WC; Lepor H; Taneja SS
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):512-7. PubMed ID: 26112001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies.
Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Blondin D; Quentin M; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Gabbert HE; Becker N; Antoch G; Albers P; Schimmöller L
Eur Urol; 2015 Oct; 68(4):713-20. PubMed ID: 26116294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utilization trend of prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and its impact on prostate cancer detection: Real-world insights from a high-volume center in southwest China.
Zhang C; Tu X; Dai J; Zhang Z; Shen C; Wu Q; Liu Z; Lin T; Qiu S; Yang L; Yang L; Zhang M; Cai D; Bao Y; Zeng H; Wei Q
Prostate; 2024 May; 84(6):539-548. PubMed ID: 38173301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High Diagnostic Performance of Short Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocols for Prostate Cancer Detection in Biopsy-naïve Men: The Next Step in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accessibility.
van der Leest M; Israël B; Cornel EB; Zámecnik P; Schoots IG; van der Lelij H; Padhani AR; Rovers M; van Oort I; Sedelaar M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Hannink G; Veltman J; Barentsz J
Eur Urol; 2019 Nov; 76(5):574-581. PubMed ID: 31167748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC
Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate on cancer detection and treatment patterns.
Liu W; Patil D; Howard DH; Moore RH; Wang H; Sanda MG; Filson CP
Urol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 37(3):181.e15-181.e21. PubMed ID: 30514604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men: The Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer (BIDOC) Study.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Winther MD; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Jun; 1(2):e180219. PubMed ID: 30646066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Value of targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion in men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen.
Sonn GA; Chang E; Natarajan S; Margolis DJ; Macairan M; Lieu P; Huang J; Dorey FJ; Reiter RE; Marks LS
Eur Urol; 2014 Apr; 65(4):809-15. PubMed ID: 23523537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimizing the Number of Cores Targeted During Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Target Biopsy.
Kenigsberg AP; Renson A; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang R; Wysock JS; Taneja SS; Bjurlin MA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):418-425. PubMed ID: 31158081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
