These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31047923)

  • 1. The effect of feedback on temporal error monitoring and timing behavior.
    Riemer M; Kubik V; Wolbers T
    Behav Brain Res; 2019 Sep; 369():111929. PubMed ID: 31047923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Metric error monitoring for a cleaner record of timing.
    Yallak E; Balcı F
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Oct; 48(10):1130-1136. PubMed ID: 35980703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Awareness of errors and feedback in human time estimation.
    Bader F; Wiener M
    Learn Mem; 2021 May; 28(5):171-177. PubMed ID: 33858970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Self-generated Behavior: Untangling Metacognitive Readout and Error Detection.
    Kononowicz TW; van Wassenhove V
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Nov; 31(11):1641-1657. PubMed ID: 31274392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metric error monitoring: Another generalized mechanism for magnitude representations?
    Yallak E; Balcı F
    Cognition; 2021 May; 210():104532. PubMed ID: 33571813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Humans can monitor trial-based but not global timing errors: Evidence for relative judgements in temporal error monitoring.
    Öztel T; Balcı F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Sep; 76(9):2155-2163. PubMed ID: 36458873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporal Metacognition as the Decoding of Self-Generated Brain Dynamics.
    Kononowicz TW; Roger C; van Wassenhove V
    Cereb Cortex; 2019 Sep; 29(10):4366-4380. PubMed ID: 30590497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Domain-specific and domain-general processes underlying metacognitive judgments.
    Fitzgerald LM; Arvaneh M; Dockree PM
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Mar; 49():264-277. PubMed ID: 28222381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sure I'm Sure: Prefrontal Oscillations Support Metacognitive Monitoring of Decision Making.
    Wokke ME; Cleeremans A; Ridderinkhof KR
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 37(4):781-789. PubMed ID: 28123015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mice monitor their timing errors.
    Öztel T; Balcı F
    Sci Rep; 2024 Oct; 14(1):23356. PubMed ID: 39375395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are errors detected before they occur? Early error sensations revealed by metacognitive judgments on the timing of error awareness.
    Di Gregorio F; Maier ME; Steinhauser M
    Conscious Cogn; 2020 Jan; 77():102857. PubMed ID: 31837572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modulation of Metacognitive Confidence Judgments Through Provision of Performance Feedback in Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.
    Chiou KS; Klecha H; Jones M; Dobryakova E
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2022 Mar-Apr 01; 37(2):71-78. PubMed ID: 33782350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are you early or late?: Temporal error monitoring.
    Akdoğan B; Balcı F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Mar; 146(3):347-361. PubMed ID: 28080127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consistency, not speed: temporal regularity as a metacognitive cue.
    Stevenson LM; Carlson RA
    Psychol Res; 2020 Feb; 84(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 29330595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neuroimaging Signatures of Metacognitive Improvement in Sensorimotor Timing.
    Bader F; Wiener M
    J Neurosci; 2024 Feb; 44(9):. PubMed ID: 38129131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual differences in first- and second-order temporal judgment.
    Corcoran AW; Groot C; Bruno A; Johnston A; Cropper SJ
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0191422. PubMed ID: 29401520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Metacognitive ability predicts learning cue-stimulus associations in the absence of external feedback.
    Hainguerlot M; Vergnaud JC; de Gardelle V
    Sci Rep; 2018 Apr; 8(1):5602. PubMed ID: 29618809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal error monitoring with directional error magnitude judgements: a robust phenomenon with no effect of being watched.
    Öztel T; Eskenazi T; Balcı F
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jul; 85(5):2069-2078. PubMed ID: 32623511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal error monitoring: Does agency matter?
    Öztel T; Balcı F
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 39424702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of metacognitive monitoring feedback on performance in a computer-based training simulation.
    Kim JH
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Feb; 67():193-202. PubMed ID: 29122190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.