49 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31049998)
1. Bayesian nonparametric estimation of ROC surface under verification bias.
Zhu R; Ghosal S
Stat Med; 2019 Aug; 38(18):3361-3377. PubMed ID: 31049998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Direct estimation of volume under the ROC surface with verification bias.
Shi S; Qin G
J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jul; 34(4):553-581. PubMed ID: 37470408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multicategory reclassification statistics for assessing improvements in diagnostic accuracy.
Li J; Jiang B; Fine JP
Biostatistics; 2013 Apr; 14(2):382-94. PubMed ID: 23197381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimation of Area Under the ROC Curve under nonignorable verification bias.
Yu W; Kim JK; Park T
Stat Sin; 2018 Oct; 28(4):2149-2166. PubMed ID: 31367164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian Estimation of Combined Accuracy for Tests with Verification Bias.
Broemeling LD
Diagnostics (Basel); 2011 Dec; 1(1):53-76. PubMed ID: 26859487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimation of multiple ordered ROC curves using placement values.
Ghosal S; Grantz KL; Chen Z
Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Aug; 31(8):1470-1483. PubMed ID: 35450477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interval estimation in three-class receiver operating characteristic analysis: A fairly general approach based on the empirical likelihood.
To DK; Adimari G; Chiogna M
Stat Methods Med Res; 2024 May; 33(5):875-893. PubMed ID: 38502023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A min-max combination of biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy.
Liu C; Liu A; Halabi S
Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(16):2005-14. PubMed ID: 21472763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An examination of data confidentiality and disclosure issues related to publication of empirical ROC curves.
Matthews GJ; Harel O
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jul; 20(7):889-96. PubMed ID: 23747154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic thresholds with three ordinal groups.
Attwood K; Tian L; Xiong C
J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(3):608-33. PubMed ID: 24707966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combining multiple biomarkers linearly to minimize the Euclidean distance of the closest point on the receiver operating characteristic surface to the perfection corner in trichotomous settings.
Mosier BR; Bantis LE
Stat Methods Med Res; 2024 Apr; 33(4):647-668. PubMed ID: 38445348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Integrated Bayesian Nonparametric Approach for Stochastic and Variability Orders in ROC Curve Estimation: An Application to Endometriosis Diagnosis.
Hwang BS; Chen Z
J Am Stat Assoc; 2015 Sep; 110(511):923-934. PubMed ID: 26839441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bayesian modeling and prediction of accrual in multi-regional clinical trials.
Deng Y; Zhang X; Long Q
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):752-765. PubMed ID: 25367100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hierarchical Bayesian bootstrap for heterogeneous treatment effect estimation.
Oganisian A; Mitra N; Roy JA
Int J Biostat; 2024 May; 20(1):93-106. PubMed ID: 36584112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian quantitative electrophysiology and its multiple applications in bioengineering.
Barr RC; Nolte LW; Pollard AE
IEEE Rev Biomed Eng; 2010; 3():155-68. PubMed ID: 22275206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Practical guide to the typical analysis of prognostic factors and biomarkers without the use of P-values.
Jin Y; Kattan MW
J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jun; 158():179-184. PubMed ID: 37011769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nonparametric estimation of linear personalized diagnostics rules via efficient grid algorithm.
Zhang Y; Chung Y
Stat Med; 2024 Mar; 43(7):1354-1371. PubMed ID: 38287456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mitigating Bias in Generalized Linear Mixed Models: The Case for Bayesian Nonparametrics.
Antonelli J; Trippa L; Haneuse S
Stat Sci; 2016 Feb; 31(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 28979066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nonparametric estimation of distributions and diagnostic accuracy based on group-tested results with differential misclassification.
Zhang W; Liu A; Li Q; Albert PS
Biometrics; 2020 Dec; 76(4):1147-1156. PubMed ID: 32083733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The diagnostic likelihood ratio function and modified test for trend: Identifying, evaluating, and validating nontraditional biomarkers in case-control studies.
Lindner H; Gimotty PA; Bilker WB
Stat Med; 2023 Dec; 42(29):5313-5337. PubMed ID: 37735925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
