357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31050148)
1. Quality evaluation of image-based iterative reconstruction for CT: Comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction.
Kawashima H; Ichikawa K; Matsubara K; Nagata H; Takata T; Kobayashi S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):199-205. PubMed ID: 31050148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultra-low peak voltage CT colonography: effect of iterative reconstruction algorithms on performance of radiologists who use anthropomorphic colonic phantoms.
Shin CI; Kim SH; Lee ES; Lee DH; Hwang EJ; Chung SY; Lee JM; Han JK; Choi BI
Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):759-71. PubMed ID: 25010640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of noise reduction on radiation dose reduction potential of virtual monochromatic spectral images: Comparison of phantom images with conventional 120 kVp images using deep learning image reconstruction and hybrid iterative reconstruction.
Masuda S; Yamada Y; Minamishima K; Owaki Y; Yamazaki A; Jinzaki M
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Apr; 149():110198. PubMed ID: 35168172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determining the radiation dose reduction potential for coronary calcium scanning with computed tomography: an anthropomorphic phantom study comparing filtered backprojection and the adaptive iterative dose reduction algorithm for image reconstruction.
Blobel J; Mews J; Schuijf JD; Overlaet W
Invest Radiol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):857-62. PubMed ID: 23917328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of a commercial hybrid iterative and model-based reconstruction algorithm in radiation oncology.
Price RG; Vance S; Cattaneo R; Schultz L; Elshaikh MA; Chetty IJ; Glide-Hurst CK
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081907. PubMed ID: 25086538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Third-Generation Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique: Phantom Study of Image Noise, Spatial Resolution, Lesion Detectability, and Dose Reduction Potential.
Euler A; Solomon J; Marin D; Nelson RC; Samei E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jun; 210(6):1301-1308. PubMed ID: 29702019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dose reduction in CT urography and vasculature phantom studies using model-based iterative reconstruction.
Page L; Wei W; Kundra V; Rong XJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):334-342. PubMed ID: 27929506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Noise and spatial resolution properties of a commercially available deep learning-based CT reconstruction algorithm.
Solomon J; Lyu P; Marin D; Samei E
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):3961-3971. PubMed ID: 32506661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reducing CT radiation dose with iterative reconstruction algorithms: the influence of scan and reconstruction parameters on image quality and CTDIvol.
Klink T; Obmann V; Heverhagen J; Stork A; Adam G; Begemann P
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Sep; 83(9):1645-54. PubMed ID: 25037931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultra-low dose chest computed tomography: Effect of iterative reconstruction levels on image quality.
Afadzi M; Lysvik EK; Andersen HK; Martinsen ACT
Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():62-68. PubMed ID: 31005179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative Image Quality and Histogram-Based Evaluations of an Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm at Low-to-Ultralow Radiation Dose Levels: A Phantom Study in Chest CT.
Lee KB; Goo HW
Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(1):119-129. PubMed ID: 29354008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characteristic image quality of a third generation dual-source MDCT scanner: Noise, resolution, and detectability.
Solomon J; Wilson J; Samei E
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4941-53. PubMed ID: 26233220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Image quality and dose reduction opportunity of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for CT: a phantom study.
Greffier J; Hamard A; Pereira F; Barrau C; Pasquier H; Beregi JP; Frandon J
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):3951-3959. PubMed ID: 32100091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A qualitative and quantitative analysis of radiation dose and image quality of computed tomography images using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
Hussain FA; Mail N; Shamy AM; Suliman A; Saoudi A
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):419-432. PubMed ID: 27167261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CT iterative reconstruction algorithms: a task-based image quality assessment.
Greffier J; Frandon J; Larbi A; Beregi JP; Pereira F
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):487-500. PubMed ID: 31359122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of volumetric noise and resolution performance for linear and nonlinear CT reconstruction methods.
Chen B; Christianson O; Wilson JM; Samei E
Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):071909. PubMed ID: 24989387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating iterative reconstruction performance in computed tomography.
Chen B; Ramirez Giraldo JC; Solomon J; Samei E
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121913. PubMed ID: 25471973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic performance of reduced-dose CT with a hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm for the detection of hypervascular liver lesions: a phantom study.
Nakamoto A; Tanaka Y; Juri H; Nakai G; Yoshikawa S; Narumi Y
Eur Radiol; 2017 Jul; 27(7):2995-3003. PubMed ID: 27957640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of synthesized normal-resolution image data generated from high-resolution acquisitions on a commercial CT scanner.
Hernandez AM; Shin DW; Abbey CK; Seibert JA; Akino N; Goto T; Vaishnav JY; Boedeker KL; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):4775-4785. PubMed ID: 32677085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
