These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31050822)

  • 1. A comparative review of network meta-analysis models in longitudinal randomized controlled trial.
    Tallarita M; De Iorio M; Baio G
    Stat Med; 2019 Jul; 38(16):3053-3072. PubMed ID: 31050822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian splines versus fractional polynomials in network meta-analysis.
    Heinecke A; Tallarita M; De Iorio M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Oct; 20(1):261. PubMed ID: 33081698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Network meta-analysis of longitudinal data using fractional polynomials.
    Jansen JP; Vieira MC; Cope S
    Stat Med; 2015 Jul; 34(15):2294-311. PubMed ID: 25877808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian indirect and mixed treatment comparisons across longitudinal time points.
    Ding Y; Fu H
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(15):2613-28. PubMed ID: 23229717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis and meta-regression with integrated nested Laplace approximations.
    Günhan BK; Friede T; Held L
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Jun; 9(2):179-194. PubMed ID: 29193801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonproportional Hazards in Network Meta-Analysis: Efficient Strategies for Model Building and Analysis.
    Wiksten A; Hawkins N; Piepho HP; Gsteiger S
    Value Health; 2020 Jul; 23(7):918-927. PubMed ID: 32762994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the impact of a matching-adjusted indirect comparison in a Bayesian network meta-analysis.
    Leahy J; Walsh C
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Dec; 10(4):546-568. PubMed ID: 31368653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hierarchical Bayesian approaches for detecting inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
    Zhao H; Hodges JS; Ma H; Jiang Q; Carlin BP
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3524-36. PubMed ID: 27037506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Borrowing of strength from indirect evidence in 40 network meta-analyses.
    Lin L; Xing A; Kofler MJ; Murad MH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 106():41-49. PubMed ID: 30342086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hypothesis testing in Bayesian network meta-analysis.
    Uhlmann L; Jensen K; Kieser M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):128. PubMed ID: 30419827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interpreting and assessing confidence in network meta-analysis results: an introduction for clinicians.
    Yang A; Pechlivanoglou P; Aoyama K
    J Anesth; 2022 Aug; 36(4):524-531. PubMed ID: 35641661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative Efficacy of Treatments for Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis.
    Maiese EM; Ainsworth C; Le Moine JG; Ahdesmäki O; Bell J; Hawe E
    Clin Ther; 2018 Mar; 40(3):480-494.e23. PubMed ID: 29500140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian meta-analysis using SAS PROC BGLIMM.
    Rott KW; Lin L; Hodges JS; Siegel L; Shi A; Chen Y; Chu H
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Nov; 12(6):692-700. PubMed ID: 34245227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Theory and practice of Bayesian and frequentist frameworks for network meta-analysis.
    Sadeghirad B; Foroutan F; Zoratti MJ; Busse JW; Brignardello-Petersen R; Guyatt G; Thabane L
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2023 Jun; 28(3):204-209. PubMed ID: 35760451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian hierarchical models for network meta-analysis incorporating nonignorable missingness.
    Zhang J; Chu H; Hong H; Virnig BA; Carlin BP
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2227-2243. PubMed ID: 26220535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Bayesian hierarchical model for network meta-analysis of multiple diagnostic tests.
    Ma X; Lian Q; Chu H; Ibrahim JG; Chen Y
    Biostatistics; 2018 Jan; 19(1):87-102. PubMed ID: 28586407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using structural equation modeling for network meta-analysis.
    Tu YK; Wu YC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):104. PubMed ID: 28709406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. GetReal in network meta-analysis: a review of the methodology.
    Efthimiou O; Debray TP; van Valkenhoef G; Trelle S; Panayidou K; Moons KG; Reitsma JB; Shang A; Salanti G;
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Sep; 7(3):236-63. PubMed ID: 26754852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of network meta-analysis in the field of physical activity and health promotion.
    Su X; McDonough DJ; Chu H; Quan M; Gao Z
    J Sport Health Sci; 2020 Dec; 9(6):511-520. PubMed ID: 32745617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An overview of methods for network meta-analysis using individual participant data: when do benefits arise?
    Debray TP; Schuit E; Efthimiou O; Reitsma JB; Ioannidis JP; Salanti G; Moons KG;
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1351-1364. PubMed ID: 27487843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.