These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31051156)

  • 1. Propensity score methods to control for confounding in observational cohort studies: a statistical primer and application to endoscopy research.
    Yang JY; Webster-Clark M; Lund JL; Sandler RS; Dellon ES; Stürmer T
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Sep; 90(3):360-369. PubMed ID: 31051156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes of Esophageal Dilation in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Safety, Efficacy, and Persistence of the Fibrostenotic Phenotype.
    Runge TM; Eluri S; Cotton CC; Burk CM; Woosley JT; Shaheen NJ; Dellon ES
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 Feb; 111(2):206-13. PubMed ID: 26753894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of Endoscopy in Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis.
    Muir AB; Merves J; Liacouras CA
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2016 Jan; 26(1):187-200. PubMed ID: 26616904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Five Steps to Successfully Implement and Evaluate Propensity Score Matching in Clinical Research Studies.
    Staffa SJ; Zurakowski D
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Oct; 127(4):1066-1073. PubMed ID: 29324498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Association Between Body Mass Index and Clinical and Endoscopic Features of Eosinophilic Esophagitis.
    Wolf WA; Piazza NA; Gebhart JH; Rusin S; Covey S; Higgins LL; Beitia R; Speck O; Woodward K; Cotton CC; Runge TM; Eluri S; Woosley JT; Shaheen NJ; Dellon ES
    Dig Dis Sci; 2017 Jan; 62(1):143-149. PubMed ID: 27778205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study.
    Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Anderson GM
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):734-53. PubMed ID: 16708349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2014 Mar; 33(7):1242-58. PubMed ID: 24122911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Studies with many covariates and few outcomes: selecting covariates and implementing propensity-score-based confounding adjustments.
    Patorno E; Glynn RJ; Hernández-Díaz S; Liu J; Schneeweiss S
    Epidemiology; 2014 Mar; 25(2):268-78. PubMed ID: 24487209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An application of propensity score matching using claims data.
    Seeger JD; Williams PL; Walker AM
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2005 Jul; 14(7):465-76. PubMed ID: 15651087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Longitudinal Studies 4: Matching Strategies to Evaluate Risk.
    James MT
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2249():167-177. PubMed ID: 33871843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Esophageal dilation: simple and effective treatment for adults with eosinophilic esophagitis and esophageal rings and narrowing.
    Bohm M; Richter JE; Kelsen S; Thomas R
    Dis Esophagus; 2010 Jul; 23(5):377-85. PubMed ID: 20353444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Propensity scores for confounder adjustment when assessing the effects of medical interventions using nonexperimental study designs.
    Stürmer T; Wyss R; Glynn RJ; Brookhart MA
    J Intern Med; 2014 Jun; 275(6):570-80. PubMed ID: 24520806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Propensity score methods for time-dependent cluster confounding.
    Cafri G; Austin PC
    Biom J; 2020 Oct; 62(6):1443-1462. PubMed ID: 32419247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis in the pediatric patient: an evidence-based approach.
    Munoz-Persy M; Lucendo AJ
    Eur J Pediatr; 2018 May; 177(5):649-663. PubMed ID: 29549437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Applied comparison of large-scale propensity score matching and cardinality matching for causal inference in observational research.
    Fortin SP; Johnston SS; Schuemie MJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 May; 21(1):109. PubMed ID: 34030640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prognostic score-based balance measures can be a useful diagnostic for propensity score methods in comparative effectiveness research.
    Stuart EA; Lee BK; Leacy FP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8 Suppl):S84-S90.e1. PubMed ID: 23849158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is There a Role for pH Impedance Monitoring in Identifying Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Children with Esophageal Atresia?
    Pesce M; Krishnan U; Saliakellis E; Lopez R; Lindley KJ; Thapar N; Borrelli O
    J Pediatr; 2019 Jul; 210():134-140. PubMed ID: 31036410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The safety of a strict wire-guided dilation protocol for eosinophilic esophagitis.
    Saligram S; McGrath K
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Jul; 26(7):699-703. PubMed ID: 24901815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of a 4-Food Elimination Diet for Children With Eosinophilic Esophagitis.
    Kagalwalla AF; Wechsler JB; Amsden K; Schwartz S; Makhija M; Olive A; Davis CM; Manuel-Rubio M; Marcus S; Shaykin R; Sulkowski M; Johnson K; Ross JN; Riffle ME; Groetch M; Melin-Aldana H; Schady D; Palac H; Kim KA; Wershil BK; Collins MH; Chehade M
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Nov; 15(11):1698-1707.e7. PubMed ID: 28603055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dilation of Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Adverse Events and Short-term Outcomes.
    Menard-Katcher C; Furuta GT; Kramer RE
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2017 May; 64(5):701-706. PubMed ID: 28055990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.