These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31051247)

  • 21. Searching multiple databases for systematic reviews: added value or diminishing returns?
    Stevinson C; Lawlor DA
    Complement Ther Med; 2004 Dec; 12(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 15649836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Searching two or more databases decreased the risk of missing relevant studies: a metaresearch study.
    Ewald H; Klerings I; Wagner G; Heise TL; Stratil JM; Lhachimi SK; Hemkens LG; Gartlehner G; Armijo-Olivo S; Nussbaumer-Streit B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Sep; 149():154-164. PubMed ID: 35654269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Literature searching for clinical and cost-effectiveness studies used in health technology assessment reports carried out for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence appraisal system.
    Royle P; Waugh N
    Health Technol Assess; 2003; 7(34):iii, ix-x, 1-51. PubMed ID: 14609481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A descriptive analysis of non-Cochrane child-relevant systematic reviews published in 2014.
    Gates M; Elliott SA; Johnson C; Thomson D; Williams K; Fernandes RM; Hartling L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):99. PubMed ID: 30285643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study.
    Bramer WM; Giustini D; Kramer BM
    Syst Rev; 2016 Mar; 5():39. PubMed ID: 26932789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Nature and reporting characteristics of UK health technology assessment systematic reviews.
    Carroll C; Kaltenthaler E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):35. PubMed ID: 29739352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Coverage of the bibliographic databases in mental health research.
    Löhönen J; Isohanni M; Nieminen P; Miettunen J
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2010 May; 64(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 19883199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of biomedical databases.
    Mychko-Megrin AY
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1991 Jul; 79(3):302-8. PubMed ID: 1884085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Health economic evaluations: how to find them.
    Alton V; Eckerlund I; Norlund A
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(4):512-7. PubMed ID: 16984686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Searching the scientific literature: implications for quantitative and qualitative reviews.
    Wu YP; Aylward BS; Roberts MC; Evans SC
    Clin Psychol Rev; 2012 Aug; 32(6):553-7. PubMed ID: 22819996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar.
    Shultz M
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2007 Oct; 95(4):442-5. PubMed ID: 17971893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Searching the literature for studies for a systematic review. Part 5: Beyond the standard electronic databases.
    Littlewood A; Kloukos D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jun; 155(6):894-895. PubMed ID: 31153512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Citation searches are more sensitive than keyword searches to identify studies using specific measurement instruments.
    Linder SK; Kamath GR; Pratt GF; Saraykar SS; Volk RJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 68(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 25554521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Use of methodological search filters to identify diagnostic accuracy studies can lead to the omission of relevant studies.
    Leeflang MM; Scholten RJ; Rutjes AW; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 59(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 16488353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A prospective comparison of evidence synthesis search strategies developed with and without text-mining tools.
    Paynter RA; Featherstone R; Stoeger E; Fiordalisi C; Voisin C; Adam GP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Nov; 139():350-360. PubMed ID: 33753230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Search strategies for nephrology knowledge and evidence].
    Strippoli GF; Manno C; Schena FP
    G Ital Nefrol; 2004; 21(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 15356850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Systematic literature search in PubMed : A short introduction].
    Blümle A; Lagrèze WA; Motschall E
    Anaesthesist; 2018 Dec; 67(12):955-972. PubMed ID: 30341447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Information retrieval for systematic reviews in food and feed topics: A narrative review.
    Wood H; O'Connor A; Sargeant J; Glanville J
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Dec; 9(4):527-539. PubMed ID: 29316306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Search and selection methodology of systematic reviews in orthodontics (2000-2004).
    Flores-Mir C; Major MP; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 16905066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The efficiency of database searches for creating systematic reviews was improved by search filters.
    Budhram D; Navarro-Ruan T; Haynes RB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 95():1-6. PubMed ID: 29191446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.