These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31051940)

  • 1. Key Performance Indicators for Comparing the Performance of Portable Radiography: Direct Digital Radiography versus Conventional Machine Computed Radiography-A Study in a Nonacute Hospital.
    Ngan TL; Wong ET; Ng KL; Jeor PK; Law MY; Lo GG
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2014 Jun; 45(2):105-114. PubMed ID: 31051940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Enhanced Workflow and Efficiency of the Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN)-Based Direct Digital Radiography (DDR) Portable Radiography.
    Ngan TL; Wong ET; Ng KL; Jeor PK; Lo GG
    J Digit Imaging; 2015 Jun; 28(3):302-8. PubMed ID: 25561071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Novel, portable, cassette-sized, and wireless flat-panel digital radiography system: initial workflow results versus computed radiography.
    Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Ackermann H; Schomerus C; Jacobi V; Balzer JO; Vogl TJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):1368-71. PubMed ID: 21606301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mobile chest imaging of neonates in incubators: Optimising DR and CR acquisitions.
    Tugwell-Allsup J; Kenworthy D; England A
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 Feb; 27(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 32636056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations.
    Andriole KP
    J Digit Imaging; 2002 Sep; 15(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 12532253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of Image Postprocessing in Digital Radiography to Detect Wooden, Soft Tissue Foreign Bodies.
    Kleinfelder TR; Ng CK
    Radiol Technol; 2022; 93(6):544-554. PubMed ID: 35790309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Workflow assessment of digital versus computed radiography and screen-film in the outpatient environment.
    Andriole KP; Luth DM; Gould RG
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():124-6. PubMed ID: 12105711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of film-screen, CR and DR: a community hospital time-motion study.
    Mehta M; Lee T
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(6):38-42. PubMed ID: 14699926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Increasing mobile radiography productivity.
    Wong E; Lung NT; Ng K; Jeor P
    Radiol Manage; 2013; 35(4):44-8. PubMed ID: 23986937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multi-institutional analysis of computed and direct radiography: part I. Technologist productivity.
    Reiner BI; Siegel EL; Hooper FJ; Siddiqui KM; Musk A; Walker L; Chacko A
    Radiology; 2005 Aug; 236(2):413-9. PubMed ID: 15972337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conventional and digital radiography in vertical root fracture diagnosis: a comparison study.
    Tofangchiha M; Bakhshi M; Fakhar HB; Panjnoush M
    Dent Traumatol; 2011 Apr; 27(2):143-6. PubMed ID: 21281444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Conventional Radiography and Digital Computerized Radiography in Patients Presenting to Emergency Department.
    Ozcete E; Boydak B; Ersel M; Kiyan S; Uz I; Cevrim O
    Turk J Emerg Med; 2015 Mar; 15(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 27331189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [An economic comparison between digital luminescence radiography and conventional film processing in intensive care medicine].
    Peters PE; Dykstra DE; Wiesmann W; Schlüchtermann J; Adam D
    Radiologe; 1992 Nov; 32(11):536-40. PubMed ID: 1461981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Status and prospects of digital detector technology for CR and DR.
    Neitzel U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):32-8. PubMed ID: 15933078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bedside Chest Radiographs in the Intensive care Setting: Wireless Direct Radiography Compared to Computed Radiography.
    Audin CR; Aran S; Muse VV; Abbott GF; Ackman JB; Sharma A; Wu CC; Kalra MK; McLoud TC; Shepard JO; Fintelmann FJ; Gilman MD
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2018 Nov; 47(6):397-403. PubMed ID: 29054314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interpretation of periapical lesions comparing conventional, direct digital, and telephonically transmitted radiographic images.
    Mistak EJ; Loushine RJ; Primack PD; West LA; Runyan DA
    J Endod; 1998 Apr; 24(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 9641132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The physics of computed radiography.
    Rowlands JA
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Dec; 47(23):R123-66. PubMed ID: 12502037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
    Niklason LT; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Chang CL; Chee PW; Mathews JF
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Film retakes in digital and conventional radiography.
    Akhtar W; Aslam M; Ali A; Mirza K; Ahmad N
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Mar; 18(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 18460242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality and operations of portable X-ray examination procedures in the emergency room: queuing theory at work.
    Abujudeh H; Vuong B; Baker SR
    Emerg Radiol; 2005 Jul; 11(5):262-6. PubMed ID: 16133619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.