269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31052898)
1. Performance estimation of space-borne high-spectral-resolution lidar for cloud and aerosol optical properties at 532 nm.
Liu D; Zheng Z; Chen W; Wang Z; Li W; Ke J; Zhang Y; Chen S; Cheng C; Wang S
Opt Express; 2019 Apr; 27(8):A481-A494. PubMed ID: 31052898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Denoising the space-borne high-spectral-resolution lidar signal with block-matching and 3D filtering.
Zheng Z; Chen W; Zhang Y; Chen S; Liu D
Appl Opt; 2020 Mar; 59(9):2820-2828. PubMed ID: 32225846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Wavelength dependence of ice cloud backscatter properties for space-borne polarization lidar applications.
Okamoto H; Sato K; Borovoi A; Ishimoto H; Masuda K; Konoshonkin A; Kustova N
Opt Express; 2020 Sep; 28(20):29178-29191. PubMed ID: 33114822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparisons of aerosol backscatter using satellite and ground lidars: implications for calibrating and validating spaceborne lidar.
Gimmestad G; Forrister H; Grigas T; O'Dowd C
Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():42337. PubMed ID: 28198389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cloud Aerosol Transport System (CATS) 1064 nm Calibration and Validation.
Pauly RM; Yorks JE; Hlavka DL; McGill MJ; Amiridis V; Palm SP; Rodier SD; Vaughan MA; Selmer PA; Kupchock AW; Baars H; Gialitaki A
Atmos Meas Tech; 2019 Nov; 12(11):6241-6258. PubMed ID: 33414857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lidar beams in opposite directions for quality assessment of Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization spaceborne measurements.
Cuesta J; Flamant PH
Appl Opt; 2010 Apr; 49(12):2232-43. PubMed ID: 20411002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-wavelength approach for aerosol-cloud discrimination in the SAGE III/ISS aerosol extinction dataset.
Bhatta S; Pandit AK; Loughman RP; Vernier JP
Appl Opt; 2023 May; 62(13):3454-3466. PubMed ID: 37132847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Depolarization ratio and attenuated backscatter for nine cloud types: analyses based on collocated CALIPSO lidar and MODIS measurements.
Cho HM; Yang P; Kattawar GW; Nasiri SL; Hu Y; Minnis P; Trepte C; Winker D
Opt Express; 2008 Mar; 16(6):3931-48. PubMed ID: 18542490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimizing cirrus optical depth retrievals over the ocean from collocated CALIPSO and AMSR-E observations.
Tang Q; Hu Y; Li W; Huang J; Stamnes K
Appl Opt; 2018 Sep; 57(26):7472-7481. PubMed ID: 30461813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CALIPSO lidar level 3 aerosol profile product: version 3 algorithm design.
Tackett JL; Winker DM; Getzewich BJ; Vaughan MA; Young SA; Kar J
Atmos Meas Tech; 2018 Jul; 11(7):4129-4152. PubMed ID: 33510819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retrieval and analysis of a polarized high-spectral-resolution lidar for profiling aerosol optical properties.
Liu D; Yang Y; Cheng Z; Huang H; Zhang B; Ling T; Shen Y
Opt Express; 2013 Jun; 21(11):13084-93. PubMed ID: 23736562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimum aerosol layer detection sensitivities and their subsequent impacts on aerosol optical thickness retrievals in CALIPSO level 2 data products.
Toth TD; Campbell JR; Reid JS; Tackett JL; Vaughan MA; Zhang J; Marquis JW
Atmos Meas Tech; 2018 Jan; 11(1):499-514. PubMed ID: 33868502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retrieval of aerosol extinction-to-backscatter ratios by combining ground-based and space-borne lidar elastic scattering measurements.
Lu X; Jiang Y; Zhang X; Wang X; Nasti L; Spinelli N
Opt Express; 2011 Mar; 19 Suppl 2():A72-9. PubMed ID: 21445222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CALIPSO Lidar Calibration at 532 nm: Version 4 Nighttime Algorithm.
Kar J; Vaughan MA; Lee KP; Tackett JL; Avery MA; Garnier A; Getzewich BJ; Hunt WH; Josset D; Liu Z; Lucker PL; Magill B; Omar AH; Pelon J; Rogers RR; Toth TD; Trepte CR; Vernier JP; Winker DM; Young SA
Atmos Meas Tech; 2018 Mar; 11(3):1459-1479. PubMed ID: 33479568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantifying the low bias of CALIPSO's column aerosol optical depth due to undetected aerosol layers.
Kim MH; Omar AH; Vaughan MA; Winker DM; Trepte CR; Hu Y; Liu Z; Kim SW
J Geophys Res Atmos; 2017 Jan; 122(2):1098-1113. PubMed ID: 31534879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of molecular scattering models on aerosol optical properties measured by high spectral resolution lidar.
Liu BY; Esselborn M; Wirth M; Fix A; Bi DC; Ehret G
Appl Opt; 2009 Sep; 48(27):5143-54. PubMed ID: 19767932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved identification of the solution space of aerosol microphysical properties derived from the inversion of profiles of lidar optical data, part 2: simulations with synthetic optical data.
Kolgotin A; Müller D; Chemyakin E; Romanov A
Appl Opt; 2016 Dec; 55(34):9850-9865. PubMed ID: 27958481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retrieving the microphysical properties of opaque liquid water clouds from CALIOP measurements.
Zhang Y; Zhao C; Zhang K; Ke J; Che H; Shen X; Zheng Z; Liu D
Opt Express; 2019 Nov; 27(23):34126-34140. PubMed ID: 31878468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of an airborne high spectral resolution Lidar and its measurement for aerosol optical properties over Qinhuangdao, China.
Wang Q; Bu L; Tian L; Xu J; Zhu S; Liu J
Opt Express; 2020 Aug; 28(17):24471-24488. PubMed ID: 32906988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of auxiliary atmospheric state parameters on the aerosol optical properties retrieval errors of high-spectral-resolution lidar.
Zhang Y; Liu D; Zheng Z; Liu Z; Hu D; Qi B; Liu C; Bi L; Zhang K; Wen C; Jiang L; Liu Y; Ke J; Zang Z
Appl Opt; 2018 Apr; 57(10):2627-2637. PubMed ID: 29714250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
