These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31053291)

  • 1. Searching the literature for studies for a systematic review. Part 4: Searching with the use of text words.
    Littlewood A; Kloukos D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 May; 155(5):741-743. PubMed ID: 31053291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions.
    Golder S; McIntosh HM; Loke Y
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 May; 6():22. PubMed ID: 16681854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Searching the literature for studies for a systematic review. Part 2: Resources for searching the medical literature.
    Littlewood A; Kloukos D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Mar; 155(3):445-447. PubMed ID: 30826048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Searching the literature for studies for a systematic review. Part 5: Beyond the standard electronic databases.
    Littlewood A; Kloukos D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jun; 155(6):894-895. PubMed ID: 31153512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Searching the literature for studies for a systematic review. Part 3: Using controlled vocabulary.
    Littlewood A; Kloukos D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Apr; 155(4):604-605. PubMed ID: 30935616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Commentary on Sood et al.: "Cochrane systematic reviews in acupuncture: methodological diversity in database searching".
    Lao L
    J Altern Complement Med; 2005 Aug; 11(4):723-4. PubMed ID: 16131299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conducting systematic reviews of intervention questions I: Writing the review protocol, formulating the question and searching the literature.
    O'Connor AM; Anderson KM; Goodell CK; Sargeant JM
    Zoonoses Public Health; 2014 Jun; 61 Suppl 1():28-38. PubMed ID: 24905994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Handsearching had best recall but poor efficiency when exporting to a bibliographic tool: case study.
    Cooper C; Snowsill T; Worsley C; Prowse A; O'Mara-Eves A; Greenwood H; Boulton E; Strickson A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jul; 123():39-48. PubMed ID: 32229252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Searching for trial protocols: A comparison of methods.
    Sutton A; Galvan De La Cruz MC; Leaviss J; Booth A
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Dec; 9(4):551-560. PubMed ID: 29088503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
    Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
    Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic searching for theory to inform systematic reviews: is it feasible? Is it desirable?
    Booth A; Carroll C
    Health Info Libr J; 2015 Sep; 32(3):220-35. PubMed ID: 26095232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Title, abstract, and keyword searching resulted in poor recovery of articles in systematic reviews of epidemiologic practice.
    Penning de Vries BBL; van Smeden M; Rosendaal FR; Groenwold RHH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 May; 121():55-61. PubMed ID: 31982541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of a search summary table to improve systematic review search methods, results, and efficiency.
    Bethel AC; Rogers M; Abbott R
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2021 Jan; 109(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 33424470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mining the bibliome: searching for a needle in a haystack? New computing tools are needed to effectively scan the growing amount of scientific literature for useful information.
    Grivell L
    EMBO Rep; 2002 Mar; 3(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 11882534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A review of the reporting of web searching to identify studies for Cochrane systematic reviews.
    Briscoe S
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 29065246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Searching for Oncology-Related Information.
    Vrabel M; Gann L
    Semin Oncol Nurs; 2018 Nov; 34(4):354-360. PubMed ID: 30268634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Failure or success of electronic search strategies to identify adverse effects data.
    Golder S; Loke YK
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2012 Apr; 100(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 22514510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Searching two or more databases decreased the risk of missing relevant studies: a metaresearch study.
    Ewald H; Klerings I; Wagner G; Heise TL; Stratil JM; Lhachimi SK; Hemkens LG; Gartlehner G; Armijo-Olivo S; Nussbaumer-Streit B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Sep; 149():154-164. PubMed ID: 35654269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Needles and haystacks.
    Callery P
    Paediatr Nurs; 2005 Sep; 17(7):14. PubMed ID: 16178163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cochrane systematic reviews in acupuncture: methodological diversity in database searching.
    Sood A; Sood R; Bauer BA; Ebbert JO
    J Altern Complement Med; 2005 Aug; 11(4):719-22. PubMed ID: 16131298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.