These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31054065)

  • 1. Using Response Times to Model Not-Reached Items due to Time Limits.
    Pohl S; Ulitzsch E; von Davier M
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):892-920. PubMed ID: 31054065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving precision of ability estimation: Getting more from response times.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):13-38. PubMed ID: 28635139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling Differences Between Response Times of Correct and Incorrect Responses.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
    Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):1018-1046. PubMed ID: 31463656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Mixture Response Time Process Model for Aberrant Behaviors and Item Nonresponses.
    Lu J; Wang C; Shi N
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):71-89. PubMed ID: 34355994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Second-Order Probability Matching Priors for the Person Parameter in Unidimensional IRT Models.
    Liu Y; Hannig J; Pal Majumder A
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):701-718. PubMed ID: 31264028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Generalized Speed-Accuracy Response Model for Dichotomous Items.
    van Rijn PW; Ali US
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):109-131. PubMed ID: 29164449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the Importance of the Speed-Ability Trade-Off When Dealing With Not Reached Items.
    Tijmstra J; Bolsinova M
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():964. PubMed ID: 29951023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Joint Modeling of Ability and Differential Speed Using Responses and Response Times.
    Fox JP; Marianti S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(4):540-53. PubMed ID: 27269482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Multiprocess Item Response Model for Not-Reached Items due to Time Limits and Quitting.
    Ulitzsch E; von Davier M; Pohl S
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 80(3):522-547. PubMed ID: 32425218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling Not-Reached Items in Timed Tests: A Response Time Censoring Approach.
    Guo J; Xu X; Ying Z; Zhang S
    Psychometrika; 2022 Sep; 87(3):835-867. PubMed ID: 34652612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cognitive diagnosis modelling incorporating item response times.
    Zhan P; Jiao H; Liao D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):262-286. PubMed ID: 28872185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling Conditional Dependence of Response Accuracy and Response Time with the Diffusion Item Response Theory Model.
    Kang I; De Boeck P; Ratcliff R
    Psychometrika; 2022 Jun; 87(2):725-748. PubMed ID: 34988775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hidden Markov Item Response Theory Models for Responses and Response Times.
    Molenaar D; Oberski D; Vermunt J; De Boeck P
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(5):606-626. PubMed ID: 27712114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of item response models for accuracy and speed of item responses with applications to adaptive testing.
    van Rijn PW; Ali US
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):317-345. PubMed ID: 28474769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using Response Times for Joint Modeling of Response and Omission Behavior.
    Ulitzsch E; von Davier M; Pohl S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(3):425-453. PubMed ID: 31448968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revisiting the 4-Parameter Item Response Model: Bayesian Estimation and Application.
    Culpepper SA
    Psychometrika; 2016 Dec; 81(4):1142-1163. PubMed ID: 26400070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling Dependence Structures for Response Times in a Bayesian Framework.
    Klotzke K; Fox JP
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):649-672. PubMed ID: 31098935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robust estimation of the hierarchical model for responses and response times.
    Ranger J; Wolgast A; Kuhn JT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Feb; 72(1):83-107. PubMed ID: 30051905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Two-Stage Approach to Differentiating Normal and Aberrant Behavior in Computer Based Testing.
    Wang C; Xu G; Shang Z
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):223-254. PubMed ID: 27796763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Joint Modeling of Compensatory Multidimensional Item Responses and Response Times.
    Man K; Harring JR; Jiao H; Zhan P
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Nov; 43(8):639-654. PubMed ID: 31551641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.