BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31054104)

  • 1. Variation in Reported Human Head Tissue Electrical Conductivity Values.
    McCann H; Pisano G; Beltrachini L
    Brain Topogr; 2019 Sep; 32(5):825-858. PubMed ID: 31054104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of uncertainty in head tissue conductivity and complexity on EEG forward modeling in neonates.
    Azizollahi H; Aarabi A; Wallois F
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Oct; 37(10):3604-22. PubMed ID: 27238749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Skull Modeling Effects in Conductivity Estimates Using Parametric Electrical Impedance Tomography.
    Fernandez-Corazza M; Turovets S; Luu P; Price N; Muravchik CH; Tucker D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2018 Aug; 65(8):1785-1797. PubMed ID: 29989921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simultaneous head tissue conductivity and EEG source location estimation.
    Akalin Acar Z; Acar CE; Makeig S
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):168-180. PubMed ID: 26302675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of head conductivity frequency response in vivo with optimized EIT-EEG.
    Dabek J; Kalogianni K; Rotgans E; van der Helm FCT; Kwakkel G; van Wegen EEH; Daffertshofer A; de Munck JC
    Neuroimage; 2016 Feb; 127():484-495. PubMed ID: 26589336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved EEG source analysis using low-resolution conductivity estimation in a four-compartment finite element head model.
    Lew S; Wolters CH; Anwander A; Makeig S; MacLeod RS
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Sep; 30(9):2862-78. PubMed ID: 19117275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison study of different head model structures with homogeneous/inhomogeneous conductivity.
    Wen P; Li Y
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2001 Mar; 24(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 11458570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A guideline for head volume conductor modeling in EEG and MEG.
    Vorwerk J; Cho JH; Rampp S; Hamer H; Knösche TR; Wolters CH
    Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 100():590-607. PubMed ID: 24971512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In Vivo Estimation of Head Tissue Conductivities Using Bound Constrained Optimization.
    Ouypornkochagorn T; Ouypornkochagorn S
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2019 Jul; 47(7):1575-1583. PubMed ID: 30927169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inter-Subject Variability of Skull Conductivity and Thickness in Calibrated Realistic Head Models.
    Antonakakis M; Schrader S; Aydin Ü; Khan A; Gross J; Zervakis M; Rampp S; Wolters CH
    Neuroimage; 2020 Dec; 223():117353. PubMed ID: 32919058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Head phantoms for bioelectromagnetic applications: a material study.
    Hunold A; Machts R; Haueisen J
    Biomed Eng Online; 2020 Nov; 19(1):87. PubMed ID: 33228687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computational representation of a realistic head and brain volume conductor model: electroencephalography simulation and visualization study.
    Kybartaite A
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2012 Nov; 28(11):1144-55. PubMed ID: 23109383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does participant's age impact on tDCS induced fields? Insights from computational simulations.
    McCann H; Beltrachini L
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Jun; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 34038881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of electrical conductivity distribution within the human head from magnetic flux density measurement.
    Gao N; Zhu SA; He B
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(11):2675-87. PubMed ID: 15901962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of head models on EEG simulations and inverse source localizations.
    Ramon C; Schimpf PH; Haueisen J
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Feb; 5():10. PubMed ID: 16466570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) algorithm: the RSM-MREIT algorithm with applications to estimation of human head conductivity.
    Gao N; Zhu SA; He B
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(12):3067-83. PubMed ID: 16757863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of head tissue conductivity in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models.
    Van Uitert R; Johnson C; Zhukov L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2129-37. PubMed ID: 15605860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of age and skull conductivity on surface and subdermal bipolar EEG leads.
    Wendel K; Väisänen J; Seemann G; Hyttinen J; Malmivuo J
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2010; 2010():397272. PubMed ID: 20130812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.
    Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.