372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31054104)
21. Sensitivity of EEG and MEG measurements to tissue conductivity.
Gençer NG; Acar CE
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 49(5):701-17. PubMed ID: 15070197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The inhomogeneous conductivity property of cranial tissues and its representation in numerical head models.
Wen P; He F; Sammut K
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1999 Sep; 22(3):92-8. PubMed ID: 10816766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The conductivity of the human skull: results of in vivo and in vitro measurements.
Oostendorp TF; Delbeke J; Stegeman DF
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Nov; 47(11):1487-92. PubMed ID: 11077742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of the electric field in the brain during transcranial direct current stimulation: A sensitivity analysis.
Santos L; Martinho M; Salvador R; Wenger C; Fernandes SR; Ripolles O; Ruffini G; Miranda PC
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():1778-1781. PubMed ID: 28268672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of conductivity uncertainties and modeling errors on EEG source localization using a 2-D model.
Awada KA; Jackson DR; Baumann SB; Williams JT; Wilton DR; Fink PW; Prasky BR
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Sep; 45(9):1135-45. PubMed ID: 9735563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The impact of inhomogeneous tissue anisotropy on potential distribution within head model.
Wen P
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2003 Sep; 26(3):115-8. PubMed ID: 14626850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Use of anisotropic modelling in electrical impedance tomography: description of method and preliminary assessment of utility in imaging brain function in the adult human head.
Abascal JF; Arridge SR; Atkinson D; Horesh R; Fabrizi L; De Lucia M; Horesh L; Bayford RH; Holder DS
Neuroimage; 2008 Nov; 43(2):258-68. PubMed ID: 18694835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Influence of head models on neuromagnetic fields and inverse source localizations.
Ramon C; Haueisen J; Schimpf PH
Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Oct; 5():55. PubMed ID: 17059601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The influence of skull-conductivity misspecification on inverse source localization in realistically shaped finite element head models.
Pohlmeier R; Buchner H; Knoll G; Rienäcker A; Beckmann R; Pesch J
Brain Topogr; 1997; 9(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 9104826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of local variations in skull and scalp thickness on EEG's and MEG's.
Cuffin BN
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Jan; 40(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 8468075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Modeling skull electrical properties.
Sadleir RJ; Argibay A
Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Oct; 35(10):1699-712. PubMed ID: 17629793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Impact of skull-to-brain conductivity ratio for high resolution EEG source localization.
Demoulin G; Pruvost-Robieux E; Marchi A; Ramdani C; Badier JM; Bartolomei F; Gavaret M
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Aug; 7(5):. PubMed ID: 34298528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. In-vivo measurements of human brain tissue conductivity using focal electrical current injection through intracerebral multicontact electrodes.
Koessler L; Colnat-Coulbois S; Cecchin T; Hofmanis J; Dmochowski JP; Norcia AM; Maillard LG
Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Feb; 38(2):974-986. PubMed ID: 27726249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Estimation of in vivo human brain-to-skull conductivity ratio from simultaneous extra- and intra-cranial electrical potential recordings.
Lai Y; van Drongelen W; Ding L; Hecox KE; Towle VL; Frim DM; He B
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Feb; 116(2):456-65. PubMed ID: 15661122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The application of electrical impedance tomography to reduce systematic errors in the EEG inverse problem--a simulation study.
Gonçalves S; de Munck JC; Heethaar RM; Lopes da Silva FH; van Dijk BW
Physiol Meas; 2000 Aug; 21(3):379-93. PubMed ID: 10984206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Computation of the potential distribution in a four-layer anisotropic concentric spherical volume conductor.
Zhou H; van Oosterom A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Feb; 39(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 1612618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An equivalent current source model and laplacian weighted minimum norm current estimates of brain electrical activity.
He B; Yao D; Lian J; Wu D
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Apr; 49(4):277-88. PubMed ID: 11942719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Modeling of the human skull in EEG source analysis.
Dannhauer M; Lanfer B; Wolters CH; Knösche TR
Hum Brain Mapp; 2011 Sep; 32(9):1383-99. PubMed ID: 20690140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Estimation of the electric conductivity from scalp measurements: feasibility and application to source localization.
van Burik MJ; Peters MJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Aug; 111(8):1514-21. PubMed ID: 10904234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
