These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31054376)

  • 1. Being observed caused physiological stress leading to poorer face recognition.
    Hills PJ; Dickinson D; Daniels LM; Boobyer CA; Burton R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 May; 196():118-128. PubMed ID: 31054376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revisiting the earliest electrophysiological correlate of familiar face recognition.
    Huang W; Wu X; Hu L; Wang L; Ding Y; Qu Z
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Oct; 120():42-53. PubMed ID: 28684327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inversion effects for faces and objects in developmental prosopagnosia: A case series analysis.
    Klargaard SK; Starrfelt R; Gerlach C
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 May; 113():52-60. PubMed ID: 29596857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Personal familiarity enhances sensitivity to horizontal structure during processing of face identity.
    Pachai MV; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ; Schyns PG; Ramon M
    J Vis; 2017 Jun; 17(6):5. PubMed ID: 28593249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Telling faces together: Learning new faces through exposure to multiple instances.
    Andrews S; Jenkins R; Cursiter H; Burton AM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(10):2041-50. PubMed ID: 25607814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
    Keyes H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recognition of face and non-face stimuli in autistic spectrum disorder.
    Arkush L; Smith-Collins AP; Fiorentini C; Skuse DH
    Autism Res; 2013 Dec; 6(6):550-60. PubMed ID: 23894016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-face recognition is characterized by "bilateral gain" and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted.
    Keyes H; Brady N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):840-7. PubMed ID: 20198537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hometown size affects the processing of naturalistic face variability.
    Balas B; Saville A
    Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():228-236. PubMed ID: 28025050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tolerance for distorted faces: challenges to a configural processing account of familiar face recognition.
    Sandford A; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 24853629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of experience-based perceptual learning in the face inversion effect.
    Civile C; Obhi SS; McLaren IPL
    Vision Res; 2019 Apr; 157():84-88. PubMed ID: 29608937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence for view-invariant face recognition units in unfamiliar face learning.
    Etchells DB; Brooks JL; Johnston RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 May; 70(5):874-889. PubMed ID: 27809666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Part and whole face representations in immediate and long-term memory.
    Tanaka JW; Heptonstall B; Campbell A
    Vision Res; 2019 Nov; 164():53-61. PubMed ID: 31585389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Viewers base estimates of face matching accuracy on their own familiarity: Explaining the photo-ID paradox.
    Ritchie KL; Smith FG; Jenkins R; Bindemann M; White D; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2015 Aug; 141():161-9. PubMed ID: 25988915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learning task affects ERP-correlates of the own-race bias, but not recognition memory performance.
    Stahl J; Wiese H; Schweinberger SR
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2027-40. PubMed ID: 20362599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recovery from adaptation to facial identity is larger for upright than inverted faces in the human occipito-temporal cortex.
    Mazard A; Schiltz C; Rossion B
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(6):912-22. PubMed ID: 16229867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Qualitative Impairment in Face Perception in Alzheimer's Disease: Evidence from a Reduced Face Inversion Effect.
    Lavallée MM; Gandini D; Rouleau I; Vallet GT; Joannette M; Kergoat MJ; Busigny T; Rossion B; Joubert S
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2016; 51(4):1225-36. PubMed ID: 26967217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Familiarity and face processing.
    Osborne CD; Stevenage SV
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 22906071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Face learning and the emergence of view-independent face recognition: an event-related brain potential study.
    Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1320-9. PubMed ID: 23583970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do people have insight into their face recognition abilities?
    Palermo R; Rossion B; Rhodes G; Laguesse R; Tez T; Hall B; Albonico A; Malaspina M; Daini R; Irons J; Al-Janabi S; Taylor LC; Rivolta D; McKone E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Feb; 70(2):218-233. PubMed ID: 26935244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.