166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31054415)
21. A socio-economic study along with impact assessment for laterite based technology demonstration for arsenic mitigation.
Mondal S; Roy A; Mukherjee R; Mondal M; Karmakar S; Chatterjee S; Mukherjee M; Bhattacharjee S; De S
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Apr; 583():142-152. PubMed ID: 28117153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Arsenic and fluoride contaminated groundwaters: A review of current technologies for contaminants removal.
Jadhav SV; Bringas E; Yadav GD; Rathod VK; Ortiz I; Marathe KV
J Environ Manage; 2015 Oct; 162():306-25. PubMed ID: 26265600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Arsenic remediation of drinking water using iron-oxide coated coal bottom ash.
Mathieu JL; Gadgil AJ; Addy SE; Kowolik K
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2010 Sep; 45(11):1446-60. PubMed ID: 20694883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Preparation and performance of arsenate (V) adsorbents derived from concrete wastes.
Sasaki T; Iizuka A; Watanabe M; Hongo T; Yamasaki A
Waste Manag; 2014 Oct; 34(10):1829-35. PubMed ID: 24472713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Adsorbents for the removal of arsenic, cadmium, and lead from contaminated waters.
Yadanaparthi SK; Graybill D; von Wandruszka R
J Hazard Mater; 2009 Nov; 171(1-3):1-15. PubMed ID: 19540667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Multiple inorganic toxic substances contaminating the groundwater of Myingyan Township, Myanmar: arsenic, manganese, fluoride, iron, and uranium.
Bacquart T; Frisbie S; Mitchell E; Grigg L; Cole C; Small C; Sarkar B
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Jun; 517():232-45. PubMed ID: 25748724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Titanium-based nanocomposite materials for arsenic removal from water: A review.
Ashraf S; Siddiqa A; Shahida S; Qaisar S
Heliyon; 2019 May; 5(5):e01577. PubMed ID: 31193228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A mini-review on arsenic remediation techniques from water and future trends.
Mahamallik P; Swain R
Water Sci Technol; 2023 Jun; 87(12):3108-3123. PubMed ID: 37387434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Metal attraction: an ironclad solution to arsenic contamination?
Frazer L
Environ Health Perspect; 2005 Jun; 113(6):A398-401. PubMed ID: 15929882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Human health implications, risk assessment and remediation of As-contaminated water: A critical review.
Shakoor MB; Nawaz R; Hussain F; Raza M; Ali S; Rizwan M; Oh SE; Ahmad S
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 601-602():756-769. PubMed ID: 28577410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Sustainable engineered processes to mitigate the global arsenic crisis in drinking water: challenges and progress.
Sarkar S; Greenleaf JE; Gupta A; Uy D; Sengupta AK
Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng; 2012; 3():497-517. PubMed ID: 22541048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Application of titanium dioxide in arsenic removal from water: A review.
Guan X; Du J; Meng X; Sun Y; Sun B; Hu Q
J Hazard Mater; 2012 May; 215-216():1-16. PubMed ID: 22445257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of a new water treatment for point-of-use household applications to remove microorganisms and arsenic from drinking water.
Souter PF; Cruickshank GD; Tankerville MZ; Keswick BH; Ellis BD; Langworthy DE; Metz KA; Appleby MR; Hamilton N; Jones AL; Perry JD
J Water Health; 2003 Jun; 1(2):73-84. PubMed ID: 15382736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Arsenic removal from groundwater of the Chaco-Pampean plain (Argentina) using natural geological materials as adsorbents.
Bundschuh J; Bhattacharya P; Sracek O; Mellano MF; Ramírez AE; Storniolo Adel R; Martín RA; Cortés J; Litter MI; Jean JS
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2011; 46(11):1297-310. PubMed ID: 21879863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Arsenic removal by natural and chemically modified water melon rind in aqueous solutions and groundwater.
Shakoor MB; Niazi NK; Bibi I; Shahid M; Sharif F; Bashir S; Shaheen SM; Wang H; Tsang DCW; Ok YS; Rinklebe J
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Dec; 645():1444-1455. PubMed ID: 30248866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Demand-based water options for arsenic mitigation: an experience from rural Bangladesh.
Hoque BA; Hoque MM; Ahmed T; Islam S; Azad AK; Ali N; Hossain M; Hossain MS
Public Health; 2004 Jan; 118(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 14643629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The nature and significance of public exposure to arsenic: a review of its relevance to South West England.
Mitchell P; Barre D
Environ Geochem Health; 1995 Jun; 17(2):57-82. PubMed ID: 24194119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A review of emerging adsorbents and current demand for defluoridation of water: Bright future in water sustainability.
Yadav KK; Gupta N; Kumar V; Khan SA; Kumar A
Environ Int; 2018 Feb; 111():80-108. PubMed ID: 29190529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of arsenic removal efficiency by an iron oxide-coated sand filter process.
Callegari A; Ferronato N; Rada EC; Capodaglio AG; Torretta V
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Sep; 25(26):26135-26143. PubMed ID: 29971744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Coexistence of adsorption and coagulation processes of both arsenate and NOM from contaminated groundwater by nanocrystallined Mg/Al layered double hydroxides.
Wu X; Tan X; Yang S; Wen T; Guo H; Wang X; Xu A
Water Res; 2013 Aug; 47(12):4159-68. PubMed ID: 23582669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
