These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31054463)

  • 21. In Vitro Effect of Lysozyme on Albumin Deposition to Hydrogel Contact Lens Materials.
    Babaei Omali N; Subbaraman LN; Heynen M; Fadli Z; Coles-Brennan C; Jones LW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Nov; 94(11):1047-1051. PubMed ID: 29040199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Characteristics of Pre-Lens Tear Film Behavior in Eyes Wearing Delefilcon A Silicone Hydrogel Water Gradient Contact Lenses.
    Yokoi N; Furusawa Y; Kato H; Kusada N; Sotozono C; Eftimov P; Georgiev GA
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Dec; 13(24):. PubMed ID: 38132226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Impact of Air Exposure Time on the Water Contact Angles of Daily Disposable Silicone Hydrogels.
    Eftimov P; Yokoi N; Peev N; Georgiev GA
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Mar; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 30875896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of multipurpose solutions on in vivo surface wettability of a silicone hydrogel lens.
    Lau JK; So HT; Chiang TK; Cho P
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Dec; 39(6):461-465. PubMed ID: 27484710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Factors that influence in vitro cholesterol deposition on contact lenses.
    Walther H; Lorentz H; Heynen M; Kay L; Jones LW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Oct; 90(10):1057-65. PubMed ID: 24013797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Videokeratoscopic assessment of silicone hydrogel contact lens wettability using a new in-vitro method.
    Havuz E; Gurkaynak MN
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2019 Dec; 42(6):614-619. PubMed ID: 31439413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Lysozyme Deposition on Contact Lenses in an In Vitro Blink-Simulation Eye Model Versus a Static Vial Deposition Model.
    Chan VWY; Phan CM; Ngo W; Jones L
    Eye Contact Lens; 2021 Jul; 47(7):388-393. PubMed ID: 33840748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Corneal cell adhesion to contact lens hydrogel materials enhanced via tear film protein deposition.
    Elkins CM; Qi QM; Fuller GG
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e105512. PubMed ID: 25144576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of Temperature and Blinking on Contact Lens Dehydration of Contemporary Soft Lens Materials Using an In Vitro Blink Model.
    Chan VWY; Phan CM; Walther H; Ngo W; Jones L
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Jul; 10(8):11. PubMed ID: 34251425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Uptake and release of polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) from hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses using a radiolabel methodology.
    Yee A; Phan CM; Jones L
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2022 Oct; 45(5):101575. PubMed ID: 35131120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The impact of tear film components on in vitro lipid uptake.
    Lorentz H; Heynen M; Trieu D; Hagedorn SJ; Jones L
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jun; 89(6):856-67. PubMed ID: 22581118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Association Between Contact Lens Discomfort and Pre-lens Tear Film Kinetics.
    Guillon M; Dumbleton KA; Theodoratos P; Wong S; Patel K; Banks G; Patel T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 93(8):881-91. PubMed ID: 27092926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical evaluation of long-term users of two contact lens care preservative systems.
    Young G; Keir N; Hunt C; Woods CA
    Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Mar; 35(2):50-8. PubMed ID: 19265324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of contact lens materials on tear physiology.
    Thai LC; Tomlinson A; Doane MG
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Mar; 81(3):194-204. PubMed ID: 15017179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact of the physical properties of contact lens materials on the discomfort: role of the coefficient of friction.
    Costa D; De Matteis V; Treso F; Montani G; Martino M; Rinaldi R; Corrado M; Cascione M
    Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2024 Jan; 233():113630. PubMed ID: 37956592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In vitro and in vivo effects of a lubricant in a contact lens solution.
    Thai LC; Tomlinson A; Simmons PA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2002 Jul; 22(4):319-29. PubMed ID: 12162483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of controlled adverse chamber environment exposure on tear functions in silicon hydrogel and hydrogel soft contact lens wearers.
    Kojima T; Matsumoto Y; Ibrahim OM; Wakamatsu TH; Uchino M; Fukagawa K; Ogawa J; Dogru M; Negishi K; Tsubota K
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Nov; 52(12):8811-7. PubMed ID: 21989724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of albumin and cholesterol on the biotribological behavior of hydrogels for contact lenses.
    Silva D; Fernandes AC; Nunes TG; Colaço R; Serro AP
    Acta Biomater; 2015 Oct; 26():184-94. PubMed ID: 26278500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Role of the post-lens tear film in the mechanism of inferior arcuate staining with ultrathin hydrogel lenses.
    Little SA; Bruce AS
    CLAO J; 1995 Jul; 21(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 7586476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Release of Moxifloxacin from Contact Lenses Using an In Vitro Eye Model: Impact of Artificial Tear Fluid Composition and Mechanical Rubbing.
    Phan CM; Bajgrowicz-Cieslak M; Subbaraman LN; Jones L
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 5(6):3. PubMed ID: 27847690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.