These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31056086)

  • 1. Coronary Angiography With Pressure Wire and Fractional Flow Reserve.
    Gaede L; Möllmann H; Rudolph T; Rieber J; Boenner F; Tröbs M
    Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2019 Mar; 116(12):205-211. PubMed ID: 31056086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation.
    Tonino PA; Fearon WF; De Bruyne B; Oldroyd KG; Leesar MA; Ver Lee PN; Maccarthy PA; Van't Veer M; Pijls NH
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Jun; 55(25):2816-21. PubMed ID: 20579537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ACIST-FFR Study (Assessment of Catheter-Based Interrogation and Standard Techniques for Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement).
    Fearon WF; Chambers JW; Seto AH; Sarembock IJ; Raveendran G; Sakarovitch C; Yang L; Desai M; Jeremias A; Price MJ;
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Dec; 10(12):e005905. PubMed ID: 29246917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of Routine Fractional Flow Reserve on Management Decision and 1-Year Clinical Outcome of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: PRIME-FFR (Insights From the POST-IT [Portuguese Study on the Evaluation of FFR-Guided Treatment of Coronary Disease] and R3F [French FFR Registry] Integrated Multicenter Registries - Implementation of FFR [Fractional Flow Reserve] in Routine Practice).
    Van Belle E; Baptista SB; Raposo L; Henderson J; Rioufol G; Santos L; Pouillot C; Ramos R; Cuisset T; Calé R; Teiger E; Jorge E; Belle L; Machado C; Barreau D; Costa M; Hanssen M; Oliveira E; Besnard C; Costa J; Dallongeville J; Pipa J; Sideris G; Fonseca N; Bretelle C; Guardado J; Lhoest N; Silva B; Barnay P; Sousa MJ; Leborgne L; Silva JC; Vincent F; Rodrigues A; Seca L; Fernandes R; Dupouy P;
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 28615234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina.
    Meijboom WB; Van Mieghem CA; van Pelt N; Weustink A; Pugliese F; Mollet NR; Boersma E; Regar E; van Geuns RJ; de Jaegere PJ; Serruys PW; Krestin GP; de Feyter PJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Aug; 52(8):636-43. PubMed ID: 18702967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Angiography Versus Hemodynamics to Predict the Natural History of Coronary Stenoses: Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography in Multivessel Evaluation 2 Substudy.
    Ciccarelli G; Barbato E; Toth GG; Gahl B; Xaplanteris P; Fournier S; Milkas A; Bartunek J; Vanderheyden M; Pijls N; Tonino P; Fearon WF; Jüni P; De Bruyne B
    Circulation; 2018 Apr; 137(14):1475-1485. PubMed ID: 29162610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography in guiding management to optimize outcomes in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (FAMOUS-NSTEMI): rationale and design of a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Berry C; Layland J; Sood A; Curzen NP; Balachandran KP; Das R; Junejo S; Henderson RA; Briggs AH; Ford I; Oldroyd KG
    Am Heart J; 2013 Oct; 166(4):662-668.e3. PubMed ID: 24093845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived vs Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment: Meta-Analysis with Subgroup Evaluation of Intermediate Stenosis.
    Baumann S; Renker M; Hetjens S; Fuller SR; Becher T; Loßnitzer D; Lehmann R; Akin I; Borggrefe M; Lang S; Wichmann JL; Schoepf UJ
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Nov; 23(11):1402-1411. PubMed ID: 27639627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combined CT coronary angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging for hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Ko BS; Cameron JD; Leung M; Meredith IT; Leong DP; Antonis PR; Crossett M; Troupis J; Harper R; Malaiapan Y; Seneviratne SK
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1097-111. PubMed ID: 23153909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CT Angiography for the Prediction of Hemodynamic Significance in Intermediate and Severe Lesions: Head-to-Head Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography Using Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard.
    Budoff MJ; Nakazato R; Mancini GB; Gransar H; Leipsic J; Berman DS; Min JK
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 May; 9(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 26897669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenosis using CT angiography: diagnostic value of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve computed from coronary CT angiography compared to invasively measured fractional flow reserve.
    Yoon YE; Choi JH; Kim JH; Park KW; Doh JH; Kim YJ; Koo BK; Min JK; Erglis A; Gwon HC; Choe YH; Choi DJ; Kim HS; Oh BH; Park YB
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1088-96. PubMed ID: 23153908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of standard- and high-dose intracoronary adenosine for the measurement of coronary fractional flow reserve (FFR).
    Röther J; Achenbach S; Tröbs M; Blachutzik F; Nef H; Marwan M; Schlundt C
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2016 Dec; 105(12):1003-1010. PubMed ID: 27307094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic performance of quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography and quantitative coronary angiography to predict hemodynamic significance of intermediate-grade stenoses.
    Ghekiere O; Dewilde W; Bellekens M; Hoa D; Couvreur T; Djekic J; Coolen T; Mancini I; Vanhoenacker PK; Dendale P; Nchimi A
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1651-61. PubMed ID: 26323355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcome impact of coronary revascularization strategy reclassification with fractional flow reserve at time of diagnostic angiography: insights from a large French multicenter fractional flow reserve registry.
    Van Belle E; Rioufol G; Pouillot C; Cuisset T; Bougrini K; Teiger E; Champagne S; Belle L; Barreau D; Hanssen M; Besnard C; Dauphin R; Dallongeville J; El Hahi Y; Sideris G; Bretelle C; Lhoest N; Barnay P; Leborgne L; Dupouy P;
    Circulation; 2014 Jan; 129(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 24255062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis by Quantitative Flow Ratio During Invasive Coronary Angiography: The WIFI II Study (Wire-Free Functional Imaging II).
    Westra J; Tu S; Winther S; Nissen L; Vestergaard MB; Andersen BK; Holck EN; Fox Maule C; Johansen JK; Andreasen LN; Simonsen JK; Zhang Y; Kristensen SD; Maeng M; Kaltoft A; Terkelsen CJ; Krusell LR; Jakobsen L; Reiber JHC; Lassen JF; Bøttcher M; Bøtker HE; Christiansen EH; Holm NR
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Mar; 11(3):e007107. PubMed ID: 29555835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.
    Pijls NH; Fearon WF; Tonino PA; Siebert U; Ikeno F; Bornschein B; van't Veer M; Klauss V; Manoharan G; Engstrøm T; Oldroyd KG; Ver Lee PN; MacCarthy PA; De Bruyne B;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Jul; 56(3):177-84. PubMed ID: 20537493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Six-Year Follow-Up of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.
    Fournier S; Toth GG; De Bruyne B; Johnson NP; Ciccarelli G; Xaplanteris P; Milkas A; Strisciuglio T; Bartunek J; Vanderheyden M; Wyffels E; Casselman F; Van Praet F; Stockman B; Degrieck I; Barbato E
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 11(6):e006368. PubMed ID: 29848611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided treatment in patients with angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery stenosis.
    Hamilos M; Muller O; Cuisset T; Ntalianis A; Chlouverakis G; Sarno G; Nelis O; Bartunek J; Vanderheyden M; Wyffels E; Barbato E; Heyndrickx GR; Wijns W; De Bruyne B
    Circulation; 2009 Oct; 120(15):1505-12. PubMed ID: 19786633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical comparison study between a newly developed optical-based fractional flow reserve device and the conventional fractional flow reserve device.
    Saka Y; Tanaka A; Ishii H; Takashima H; Suzuki A; Nakano Y; Sakurai S; Ando H; Murohara T; Amano T
    Coron Artery Dis; 2020 Jun; 31(4):342-347. PubMed ID: 31913164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study.
    Koo BK; Erglis A; Doh JH; Daniels DV; Jegere S; Kim HS; Dunning A; DeFrance T; Lansky A; Leipsic J; Min JK
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Nov; 58(19):1989-97. PubMed ID: 22032711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.