These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31056237)

  • 1. Influence of cone beam computed tomography versus panoramic radiography on the surgical technique of third molar removal: a systematic review.
    Araujo GTT; Peralta-Mamani M; Silva AFMD; Rubira CMF; Honório HM; Rubira-Bullen IRF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 48(10):1340-1347. PubMed ID: 31056237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CBCT does not reduce neurosensory disturbances after third molar removal compared to panoramic radiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    de Toledo Telles-Araújo G; Peralta-Mamani M; Caminha RDG; de Fatima Moraes-da-Silva A; Rubira CMF; Honório HM; Rubira-Bullen IRF
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Mar; 24(3):1137-1149. PubMed ID: 32052178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contiguity between the mandibular canal and the mandibular third molar in panoramic tomography compared with cone beam computed tomography: a topographic analysis.
    Deppe H; Ritschl LM; Kleinschmidt J; Wagenpfeil S; Sculean A
    Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(6):470-477. PubMed ID: 31086860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can preoperative imaging help to predict postoperative outcome after wisdom tooth removal? A randomized controlled trial using panoramic radiography versus cone-beam CT.
    Guerrero ME; Botetano R; Beltran J; Horner K; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Jan; 18(1):335-42. PubMed ID: 23494455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of cone beam CT for the removal of wisdom teeth changes the surgical approach compared with panoramic radiography: a pilot study.
    Ghaeminia H; Meijer GJ; Soehardi A; Borstlap WA; Mulder J; Vlijmen OJ; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(8):834-9. PubMed ID: 21507612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic value of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in predicting mandibular nerve exposure during third molar surgery.
    Hasani A; Ahmadi Moshtaghin F; Roohi P; Rakhshan V
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Feb; 46(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 27810140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Panoramic radiography in evaluating the relationship of mandibular canal and impacted third molars in comparison with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Ishak MH; Zhun OC; Shaari R; Rahman SA; Hasan MN; Alam MK
    Mymensingh Med J; 2014 Oct; 23(4):781-6. PubMed ID: 25481601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography.
    Ghaeminia H; Meijer GJ; Soehardi A; Borstlap WA; Mulder J; Bergé SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 38(9):964-71. PubMed ID: 19640685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal bone loss in the second molar related to impacted mandibular third molars: comparison between panoramic images and cone beam computed tomography.
    Dias MJ; Franco A; Junqueira JL; Fayad FT; Pereira PH; Oenning AC
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2020 May; 25(3):e395-e402. PubMed ID: 32271319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inferior alveolar nerve injury: Correlation between indicators of risk on panoramic radiographs and the incidence of tooth and mandibular canal contact on cone-beam computed tomography scans in a Western Australian population.
    Winstanley KL; Otway LM; Thompson L; Brook ZH; King N; Koong B; O'Halloran M
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2018 Aug; 9(3):e12323. PubMed ID: 29399983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. External root resorption of the second molar associated with third molar impaction: comparison of panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography.
    Oenning AC; Neves FS; Alencar PN; Prado RF; Groppo FC; Haiter-Neto F
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Aug; 72(8):1444-55. PubMed ID: 24856956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiologic assessment of mandibular third molars: an ex vivo comparative study of panoramic radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography, and cone beam computed tomography.
    Freire BB; Nascimento EHL; Vasconcelos KF; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Aug; 128(2):166-175. PubMed ID: 31072782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation of darkening of impacted mandibular third molar root on digital panoramic images with cone beam computed tomography findings.
    Tantanapornkul W; Okochi K; Bhakdinaronk A; Ohbayashi N; Kurabayashi T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Jan; 38(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 19114418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT compared to panoramic radiography in predicting IAN exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Reia VCB; de Toledo Telles-Araujo G; Peralta-Mamani M; Biancardi MR; Rubira CMF; Rubira-Bullen IRF
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Aug; 25(8):4721-4733. PubMed ID: 34275000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Relationship between the impacted mandibular third molar and the mandibular canal on panoramic radiograph and cone beam computed tomography].
    Chen Q; Liu DG; Zhang G; Ma XC
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 44(4):217-21. PubMed ID: 19576002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiographic evaluation of mandibular third molars: an ex vivo comparative study between multilayer and conventional panoramic radiography.
    Machado AH; Freitas DQ; Fontenele RC; Farias-Gomes A; Francesquini Júnior L; Ambrosano GMB
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Nov; 27(11):6451-6460. PubMed ID: 37728617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Image and surgery-related costs comparing cone beam CT and panoramic imaging before removal of impacted mandibular third molars.
    Petersen LB; Olsen KR; Christensen J; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(6):20140001. PubMed ID: 24922557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inferior alveolar nerve sensory disturbance after impacted mandibular third molar evaluation using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography: a pilot study.
    Guerrero ME; Nackaerts O; Beinsberger J; Horner K; Schoenaers J; Jacobs R;
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 70(10):2264-70. PubMed ID: 22705219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation by dental cone-beam computed tomography of the incidence and sites of branches of the inferior dental canal that supply mandibular third molars.
    Ogawa A; Fukuta Y; Nakasato H; Nakasato S
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Dec; 54(10):1116-1120. PubMed ID: 27576162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does additional cone beam computed tomography decrease the risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury in high-risk cases undergoing third molar surgery?Does CBCT decrease the risk of IAN injury?
    Korkmaz YT; Kayıpmaz S; Senel FC; Atasoy KT; Gumrukcu Z
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 May; 46(5):628-635. PubMed ID: 28174060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.