These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31056237)

  • 21. Mandibular canal-related parameters interpreted in panoramic images and CBCT of mandibular third molars as risk factors to predict sensory disturbances of the inferior alveolar nerve.
    Matzen LH; Petersen LB; Schropp L; Wenzel A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Aug; 48(8):1094-1101. PubMed ID: 30975577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars.
    Tantanapornkul W; Okouchi K; Fujiwara Y; Yamashiro M; Maruoka Y; Ohbayashi N; Kurabayashi T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Feb; 103(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 17234544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Is Panoramic Imaging Equivalent to Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Classifying Impacted Lower Third Molars?
    Brasil DM; Nascimento EHL; Gaêta-Araujo H; Oliveira-Santos C; Maria de Almeida S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 77(10):1968-1974. PubMed ID: 31075253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical relevance of cone beam computed tomography in mandibular third molar removal: A multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
    Ghaeminia H; Gerlach NL; Hoppenreijs TJ; Kicken M; Dings JP; Borstlap WA; de Haan T; Bergé SJ; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 43(10):2158-67. PubMed ID: 26596360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Geometric distortion of panoramic reconstruction in third molar tilting assessments: a comprehensive evaluation.
    Lupi SM; Galinetto P; Cislaghi M; Rodriguez Y Baena A; Scribante A; Rodriguez Y Baena R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Oct; 47(7):20170467. PubMed ID: 29916727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of CBCT and panoramic radiography for the assessment of bone loss and root resorption on the second molar associated with third molar impaction: a systematic review.
    Moreira-Souza L; Butini Oliveira L; Gaêta-Araujo H; Almeida-Marques M; Asprino L; Oenning AC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 Mar; 51(3):20210217. PubMed ID: 34520245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Identification of Specific Panoramic High-Risk Signs in Impacted Third Molar Cases in Which Cone Beam Computed Tomography Changes the Treatment Decision.
    Szalma J; Vajta L; Lovász BV; Kiss C; Soós B; Lempel E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jul; 78(7):1061-1070. PubMed ID: 32304662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography, stereo-scanography and cone beam CT for assessment of mandibular third molars before surgery.
    Hauge Matzen L; Christensen J; Hintze H; Schou S; Wenzel A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Nov; 71(6):1391-8. PubMed ID: 23356838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Proximity of mandibular third molar root(s) to surrounding cortical bone: cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and panoramic findings.
    Wihokrut S; Vorakulpipat C; Manosuthi P; Waikakul A
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jun; 26(2):311-319. PubMed ID: 34374876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam CT compared with panoramic images in predicting retromolar canal during extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.
    Sisman Y; Ercan-Sekerci A; Payveren-Arikan M; Sahman H
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2015 Jan; 20(1):e74-81. PubMed ID: 25475767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Relationships between third-molar juxta-apical radiolucencies and mandibular canals in panoramic and cone beam computed tomography images.
    Kapila R; Harada N; Araki K; Sano T; Goto TK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 May; 117(5):640-644. PubMed ID: 24725991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of the relationship between mandibular third molar and mandibular canal by different algorithms of cone-beam computed tomography.
    Mehdizadeh M; Ahmadi N; Jamshidi M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):740-5. PubMed ID: 25825100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Characteristic findings on panoramic radiography and cone-beam CT to predict paresthesia after extraction of impacted third molar.
    Harada N; Beloor Vasudeva S; Matsuda Y; Seki K; Kapila R; Ishikawa N; Okano T; Sano T
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2015; 56(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 25765570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Neurosensoric disturbances after surgical removal of the mandibular third molar based on either panoramic imaging or cone beam CT scanning: A randomized controlled trial (RCT).
    Petersen LB; Vaeth M; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(2):20150224. PubMed ID: 26648386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact of CBCT on treatment decision related to surgical removal of impacted maxillary third molars: does CBCT change the surgical approach?
    Hermann L; Wenzel A; Schropp L; Matzen LH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Dec; 48(8):20190209. PubMed ID: 31452392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparing third molar root development staging in panoramic radiography, extracted teeth, and cone beam computed tomography.
    Franco A; Vetter F; Coimbra EF; Fernandes Â; Thevissen P
    Int J Legal Med; 2020 Jan; 134(1):347-353. PubMed ID: 31754774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Risk factors in oroantral communication while extracting the upper third molar: Systematic review.
    Lewusz-Butkiewicz K; Kaczor K; Nowicka A
    Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 30152638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison between cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in the assessment of the relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted class C mandibular third molars.
    Dalili Z; Mahjoub P; Sigaroudi AK
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2011 Oct; 8(4):203-10. PubMed ID: 22135692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Does the Use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Before Mandibular Third Molar Surgery Impact Treatment Planning?
    Baqain ZH; AlHadidi A; AbuKaraky A; Khader Y
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jul; 78(7):1071-1077. PubMed ID: 32277937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Efficacy of CBCT for assessment of impacted mandibular third molars: a review - based on a hierarchical model of evidence.
    Matzen LH; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(1):20140189. PubMed ID: 25135317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.