These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31056237)

  • 41. Reliability of CBCT and other radiographic methods in preoperative evaluation of lower third molars.
    Suomalainen A; Ventä I; Mattila M; Turtola L; Vehmas T; Peltola JS
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Feb; 109(2):276-84. PubMed ID: 20123411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Impacted lower third molar fused with a supernumerary tooth--diagnosis and treatment planning using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Ferreira-Junior O; de Avila LD; Sampieri MB; Dias-Ribeiro E; Chen WL; Fan S
    Int J Oral Sci; 2009 Dec; 1(4):224-8. PubMed ID: 20690426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Can diagnostic changes caused by cone beam computed tomography alter the clinical decision in impacted lower third molar treatment plan?
    Mendonça LM; Gaêta-Araujo H; Cruvinel PB; Tosin IW; Azenha MR; Ferraz EP; Oliveira-Santos C; Tirapelli C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 May; 50(4):20200412. PubMed ID: 33197216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of panoramic radiography with cone beam CT in predicting the relationship of the mandibular third molar roots to the alveolar canal.
    Shahidi S; Zamiri B; Bronoosh P
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2013 Jun; 43(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 23807934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Radiographic signs of pathology determining removal of an impacted mandibular third molar assessed in a panoramic image or CBCT.
    Matzen LH; Schropp L; Spin-Neto R; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Jan; 46(1):20160330. PubMed ID: 27681861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cone beam computed tomography in pre-surgical assessment of mandibular third molars.
    Fee PA; Wright A; Cunningham C
    Evid Based Dent; 2016 Dec; 17(4):117-118. PubMed ID: 27980326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Prognosis for the impacted lower third molars: Panoramic reconstruction versus tomographic images.
    Moreira PEO; Normando D; Pinheiro LR; Brandão GAM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Dec; 130(6):625-631. PubMed ID: 32981872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Panoramic versus CBCT used to reduce inferior alveolar nerve paresthesia after third molar extractions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Del Lhano NC; Ribeiro RA; Martins CC; Assis NMSP; Devito KL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 May; 49(4):20190265. PubMed ID: 31724883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. External root resorption of the second molar associated with mesially and horizontally impacted mandibular third molar: evidence from cone beam computed tomography.
    Wang D; He X; Wang Y; Li Z; Zhu Y; Sun C; Ye J; Jiang H; Cheng J
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1335-1342. PubMed ID: 27316639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Correlation of Panoramic Radiography, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, and Three-Dimensional Printing in the Assessment of the Spatial Location of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.
    Jaroń A; Gabrysz-Trybek E; Bladowska J; Trybek G
    J Clin Med; 2021 Sep; 10(18):. PubMed ID: 34575304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Association between impacted third molars and position of the mandibular canal: a morphological analysis using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Quirino de Almeida Barros R; Bezerra de Melo N; de Macedo Bernardino Í; Arêa Leão Lopes Araújo Arruda MJ; Meira Bento P
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 56(10):952-955. PubMed ID: 30448357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Radiographic imaging in relation to the mandibular third molar: a survey among oral surgeons in Sweden.
    Cederhag J; Truedsson A; Alstergren P; Shi XQ; Hellén-Halme K
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Feb; 26(2):2073-2083. PubMed ID: 34596771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Third molar position: reliability of panoramic radiography.
    Nakagawa Y; Ishii H; Nomura Y; Watanabe NY; Hoshiba D; Kobayashi K; Ishibashi K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 65(7):1303-8. PubMed ID: 17577493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A comparative evaluation of film and digital panoramic radiographs in the assessment of position and morphology of impacted mandibular third molars.
    Mahesh MS; Mahima VG; Patil K
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 21891889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effect of two enhancement tools on the assessment of the relationship between third molars and the inferior alveolar canal.
    Peixoto LR; Gonzaga AK; Melo SL; Pontual ML; Pontual Ados A; de Melo DP
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 43(5):637-42. PubMed ID: 25887428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of panoramic radiography and cone beam CT in the assessment of juxta-apical radiolucency.
    Nascimento EHL; Oenning ACC; Freire BB; Gaêta-Araujo H; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Jan; 47(1):20170198. PubMed ID: 28871830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Radiographic methods used before removal of mandibular third molars among randomly selected general dental clinics.
    Matzen LH; Petersen LB; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150226. PubMed ID: 26943178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Elimination of permanent injuries to the inferior alveolar nerve following surgical intervention of the "high risk" third molar.
    Umar G; Obisesan O; Bryant C; Rood JP
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 51(4):353-7. PubMed ID: 23010201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Analysis of C-shaped canals by panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography: root-type specificity by longitudinal distribution.
    Sinanoglu A; Helvacioglu-Yigit D
    J Endod; 2014 Jul; 40(7):917-21. PubMed ID: 24935535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Replacing Heavily Damaged Teeth by Third Molar Autotransplantation With the Use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Rapid Prototyping.
    Verweij JP; Anssari Moin D; Wismeijer D; van Merkesteyn JPR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Sep; 75(9):1809-1816. PubMed ID: 28453949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.