BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31056310)

  • 1. Low antimüllerian hormone (AMH) is associated with decreased live birth after in vitro fertilization when follicle-stimulating hormone and AMH are discordant.
    Ligon S; Lustik M; Levy G; Pier B
    Fertil Steril; 2019 Jul; 112(1):73-81.e1. PubMed ID: 31056310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Antimüllerian hormone as a predictor of live birth following assisted reproduction: an analysis of 85,062 fresh and thawed cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database for 2012-2013.
    Tal R; Seifer DB; Wantman E; Baker V; Tal O
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Feb; 109(2):258-265. PubMed ID: 29331235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prognostic indicators of assisted reproduction technology outcomes of cycles with ultralow serum antimüllerian hormone: a multivariate analysis of over 5,000 autologous cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database for 2012-2013.
    Seifer DB; Tal O; Wantman E; Edul P; Baker VL
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):385-93.e3. PubMed ID: 26515380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retrospective study of ovarian reaction and fertility in women with discordant antimullerian hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone/luteinizing hormone ratios during in vitro fertilization.
    Wang J; Lv Y; Wang X; Zhu G; Zhao F
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Mar; 49(3):966-972. PubMed ID: 36734373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discordant anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) among women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF): which one is the better predictor for live birth?
    Wang S; Zhang Y; Mensah V; Huber WJ; Huang YT; Alvero R
    J Ovarian Res; 2018 Jul; 11(1):60. PubMed ID: 30012195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individualized versus conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, phase 3 noninferiority trial.
    Nyboe Andersen A; Nelson SM; Fauser BC; García-Velasco JA; Klein BM; Arce JC;
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Feb; 107(2):387-396.e4. PubMed ID: 27912901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anti-Müllerian Hormone and Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Are Poor Independent Predictors of Live Birth After Assisted Reproductive Technology.
    Siegel DR; Grau L; Sammel M; Nel-Themaaat L; Santoro N; Polotsky AJ
    Reprod Sci; 2023 Apr; 30(4):1316-1323. PubMed ID: 36194358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Antimüllerian hormone: prediction of cumulative live birth in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist treatment for in vitro fertilization.
    Hamdine O; Eijkemans MJC; Lentjes EGW; Torrance HL; Macklon NS; Fauser BCJM; Broekmans FJ
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Oct; 104(4):891-898.e2. PubMed ID: 26196233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictive value of antral follicle count and serum anti-Müllerian hormone: Which is better for live birth prediction in patients aged over 40 with their first IVF treatment?
    Lee Y; Kim TH; Park JK; Eum JH; Lee HJ; Kim J; Lyu SW; Kim YS; Lee WS; Yoon TK
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Feb; 221():151-155. PubMed ID: 29306180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maternal serum concentration of anti-Müllerian hormone is a better predictor than basal follicle stimulating hormone of successful blastocysts development during IVF treatment.
    Sadruddin S; Barnett B; Ku L; Havemann D; Mucowski S; Herrington R; Burggren W
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0239779. PubMed ID: 33044971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Antimüllerian hormone as predictor of reproductive outcome in subfertile women with elevated basal follicle-stimulating hormone levels: a follow-up study.
    Yarde F; Voorhuis M; Dólleman M; Knauff EA; Eijkemans MJ; Broekmans FJ
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Sep; 100(3):831-8. PubMed ID: 23755952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High frequency of discordance between antimüllerian hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone levels in serum from estradiol-confirmed days 2 to 4 of the menstrual cycle from 5,354 women in U.S. fertility centers.
    Leader B; Hegde A; Baca Q; Stone K; Lannon B; Seifer DB; Broekmans F; Baker VL
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Oct; 98(4):1037-42. PubMed ID: 22771028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic antimüllerian hormone levels during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation predict in vitro fertilization response and pregnancy outcomes.
    Styer AK; Gaskins AJ; Brady PC; Sluss PM; Chavarro JE; Hauser RB; Toth TL
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Nov; 104(5):1153-61.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26315051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of serum anti-Mullerian hormone as a biomarker of early ovarian aging in young women undergoing IVF/ICSI cycle.
    Lin PY; Huang FJ; Kung FT; Chiang HJ; Lin YJ; Lin YC; Lan KC
    Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2014; 7(9):6245-53. PubMed ID: 25337276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diminished ovarian reserve as measured by means of baseline follicle-stimulating hormone and antral follicle count is not associated with pregnancy loss in younger in vitro fertilization patients.
    Bishop LA; Richter KS; Patounakis G; Andriani L; Moon K; Devine K
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Dec; 108(6):980-987. PubMed ID: 29202975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The addition of anti-Müllerian hormone in an algorithm for individualized hormone dosage did not improve the prediction of ovarian response-a randomized, controlled trial.
    Magnusson Å; Nilsson L; Oleröd G; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Bergh C
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):811-819. PubMed ID: 28175316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Antral follicle count determines poor ovarian response better than anti-Müllerian hormone but age is the only predictor for live birth in in vitro fertilization cycles.
    Mutlu MF; Erdem M; Erdem A; Yildiz S; Mutlu I; Arisoy O; Oktem M
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2013 Jun; 30(5):657-65. PubMed ID: 23508679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What are the likely IVF/ICSI outcomes if there is a discrepancy between serum AMH and FSH levels? A multicenter retrospective study.
    Daney de Marcillac F; Pinton A; Guillaume A; Sagot P; Pirrello O; Rongieres C
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Oct; 46(8):629-635. PubMed ID: 28843783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Circulating basal anti-Müllerian hormone levels as predictor of ovarian response in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization.
    Nardo LG; Gelbaya TA; Wilkinson H; Roberts SA; Yates A; Pemberton P; Laing I
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Nov; 92(5):1586-93. PubMed ID: 18930213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of ovarian reserve parameters for predicting live births in women undergoing in vitro fertilization.
    Lukaszuk K; Kunicki M; Liss J; Lukaszuk M; Jakiel G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jun; 168(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 23485092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.