147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31056376)
21. Cobalt-60 tomotherapy: clinical treatment planning and phantom dose delivery studies.
Dhanesar S; Darko J; Joshi CP; Kerr A; Schreiner LJ
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081710. PubMed ID: 23927307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Helical tomotherapy to LINAC plan conversion utilizing RayStation Fallback planning.
Zhang X; Penagaricano J; Narayanasamy G; Corry P; Liu T; Sanjay M; Paudel N; Morrill S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):178-185. PubMed ID: 28291935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Helical tomotherapy versus single-arc intensity-modulated arc therapy: a collaborative dosimetric comparison between two institutions.
Rong Y; Tang G; Welsh JS; Mohiuddin MM; Paliwal B; Yu CX
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Sep; 81(1):284-96. PubMed ID: 21236598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Conversion of helical tomotherapy plans to step-and-shoot IMRT plans--Pareto front evaluation of plans from a new treatment planning system.
Petersson K; Ceberg C; Engström P; Benedek H; Nilsson P; Knöös T
Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):3130-8. PubMed ID: 21815387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of surface and superficial dose for head and neck treatments using conventional or intensity-modulated techniques.
Higgins PD; Han EY; Yuan JL; Hui S; Lee CK
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(4):1135-46. PubMed ID: 17264375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of plan quality provided by intensity-modulated arc therapy and helical tomotherapy.
Cao D; Holmes TW; Afghan MK; Shepard DM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Sep; 69(1):240-50. PubMed ID: 17707278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Measurement-guided volumetric dose reconstruction for helical tomotherapy.
Stambaugh C; Nelms B; Wolf T; Mueller R; Geurts M; Opp D; Moros E; Zhang G; Feygelman V
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 16(2):5298. PubMed ID: 26103199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dosimetry of the head and neck: a comparison of treatment plans using linear accelerator-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy.
Sheng K; Molloy JA; Read PW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 16751074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of treatment planning parameters for dose painting head and neck plans delivered with tomotherapy.
Skórska M; Piotrowski T; Ryczkowski A; Kaźmierska J
Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1060):20150970. PubMed ID: 26828971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A motion phantom study on helical tomotherapy: the dosimetric impacts of delivery technique and motion.
Kanagaki B; Read PW; Molloy JA; Larner JM; Sheng K
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):243-55. PubMed ID: 17183139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical implementation of an exit detector-based dose reconstruction tool for helical tomotherapy delivery quality assurance.
Deshpande S; Xing A; Metcalfe P; Holloway L; Vial P; Geurts M
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5457-5466. PubMed ID: 28737014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Helical tomotherapy-based STAT stereotactic body radiation therapy: Dosimetric evaluation for a real-time SBRT treatment planning and delivery program.
Dunlap N; McIntosh A; Sheng K; Yang W; Turner B; Shoushtari A; Sheehan J; Jones DR; Lu W; Ruchala K; Olivera G; Parnell D; Larner JL; Benedict SH; Read PW
Med Dosim; 2010; 35(4):312-9. PubMed ID: 21055611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Planning evaluation of radiotherapy for complex lung cancer cases using helical tomotherapy.
Kron T; Grigorov G; Yu E; Yartsev S; Chen JZ; Wong E; Rodrigues G; Trenka K; Coad T; Bauman G; Van Dyk J
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Aug; 49(16):3675-90. PubMed ID: 15446797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Determining efficient helical IMRT modulation factor from the MLC leaf-open time distribution on precision treatment planning system.
Boyd R; Jeong K; Tomé WA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 May; 20(5):64-74. PubMed ID: 30957967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Radiobiologic comparison of helical tomotherapy, intensity modulated radiotherapy, and conformal radiotherapy in treating lung cancer accounting for secondary malignancy risks.
Komisopoulos G; Mavroidis P; Rodriguez S; Stathakis S; Papanikolaou N; Nikiforidis GC; Sakellaropoulos GC
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 25168596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A virtual source model for Monte Carlo simulation of helical tomotherapy.
Yuan J; Rong Y; Chen Q
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 16(1):4992. PubMed ID: 25679157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Analysis of modulation factor to shorten the delivery time in helical tomotherapy.
Shimizu H; Sasaki K; Tachibana H; Tomita N; Makita C; Nakashima K; Yokoi K; Kubota T; Yoshimoto M; Iwata T; Kodaira T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 May; 18(3):83-87. PubMed ID: 28444831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparing the quality of passively-scattered proton and photon tomotherapy plans for brain and head and neck disease sites.
Kainz K; Firat S; Wilson JF; Schultz C; Siker M; Wang A; Olson D; Li XA
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Mar; 60(6):2167-77. PubMed ID: 25683607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Commissioning of intensity modulated neutron radiotherapy (IMNRT).
Burmeister J; Spink R; Liang L; Bossenberger T; Halford R; Brandon J; Delauter J; Snyder M
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021718. PubMed ID: 23387741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
