These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31056503)

  • 1. Neural Comodulation of Independent Brain Processes Related to Multitasking.
    Do TN; Chuang CH; Hsiao SJ; Lin CT; Wang YK
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2019 Jun; 27(6):1160-1169. PubMed ID: 31056503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Isolating the neural mechanisms of interference during continuous multisensory dual-task performance.
    Kasper RW; Cecotti H; Touryan J; Eckstein MP; Giesbrecht B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):476-89. PubMed ID: 24047391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. EEG-Based Attention Tracking During Distracted Driving.
    Wang YK; Jung TP; Lin CT
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2015 Nov; 23(6):1085-94. PubMed ID: 25850090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Kinesthesia in a sustained-attention driving task.
    Chuang CH; Ko LW; Jung TP; Lin CT
    Neuroimage; 2014 May; 91():187-202. PubMed ID: 24444995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conversation effects on neural mechanisms underlying reaction time to visual events while viewing a driving scene: fMRI analysis and asynchrony model.
    Hsieh L; Young RA; Bowyer SM; Moran JE; Genik RJ; Green CC; Chiang YR; Yu YJ; Liao CC; Seaman S
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1251():162-75. PubMed ID: 18952070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conversation effects on neural mechanisms underlying reaction time to visual events while viewing a driving scene using MEG.
    Bowyer SM; Hsieh L; Moran JE; Young RA; Manoharan A; Liao CC; Malladi K; Yu YJ; Chiang YR; Tepley N
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1251():151-61. PubMed ID: 18992728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The functional neuroanatomy of multitasking: combining dual tasking with a short term memory task.
    Deprez S; Vandenbulcke M; Peeters R; Emsell L; Amant F; Sunaert S
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Sep; 51(11):2251-60. PubMed ID: 23938320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Utility-based early modulation of processing distracting stimulus information.
    Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    J Neurosci; 2014 Dec; 34(50):16720-5. PubMed ID: 25505324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alpha Oscillations in the Human Brain Implement Distractor Suppression Independent of Target Selection.
    Wöstmann M; Alavash M; Obleser J
    J Neurosci; 2019 Dec; 39(49):9797-9805. PubMed ID: 31641052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increased visual task difficulty enhances attentional capture by both visual and auditory distractor stimuli.
    Sugimoto F; Katayama J
    Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 1664():55-62. PubMed ID: 28377160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modality-specific spectral dynamics in response to visual and tactile sequential shape information processing tasks: An MEG study using multivariate pattern classification analysis.
    Gohel B; Lee P; Jeong Y
    Brain Res; 2016 Aug; 1644():39-52. PubMed ID: 27134037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural Architecture of Selective Stopping Strategies: Distinct Brain Activity Patterns Are Associated with Attentional Capture But Not with Outright Stopping.
    Sebastian A; Rössler K; Wibral M; Mobascher A; Lieb K; Jung P; Tüscher O
    J Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 37(40):9785-9794. PubMed ID: 28887387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mapping the spatiotemporal dynamics of processing task-relevant and task-irrelevant sound feature changes using concurrent EEG-fMRI.
    Puschmann S; Huster RJ; Thiel CM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Oct; 37(10):3400-16. PubMed ID: 27280466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Self-initiated actions result in suppressed auditory but amplified visual evoked components in healthy participants.
    Mifsud NG; Oestreich LK; Jack BN; Ford JM; Roach BJ; Mathalon DH; Whitford TJ
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):723-32. PubMed ID: 26751981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhanced executive attention efficiency after adaptive force control training: Behavioural and physiological results.
    Liu M; Zhang J; Jia W; Chang Q; Shan S; Hu Y; Wang D
    Behav Brain Res; 2019 Dec; 376():111859. PubMed ID: 30898680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Control mechanisms mediating shifts of attention in auditory and visual space: a spatio-temporal ERP analysis.
    Green JJ; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; McDonald JJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):358-69. PubMed ID: 16075294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning What Is Irrelevant or Relevant: Expectations Facilitate Distractor Inhibition and Target Facilitation through Distinct Neural Mechanisms.
    van Moorselaar D; Slagter HA
    J Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 39(35):6953-6967. PubMed ID: 31270162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effects of Cognitive and Visual Workload on Peripheral Detection in the Detection Response Task.
    van Winsum W
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):855-869. PubMed ID: 29791188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imagery and retrieval of auditory and visual information: neural correlates of successful and unsuccessful performance.
    Huijbers W; Pennartz CM; Rubin DC; Daselaar SM
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1730-40. PubMed ID: 21396384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alpha spindles as neurophysiological correlates indicating attentional shift in a simulated driving task.
    Sonnleitner A; Simon M; Kincses WE; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 22094045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.