BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31056757)

  • 1. Hubert's multi-rater kappa revisited.
    Martín Andrés A; Álvarez Hernández M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 31056757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measures of Agreement with Multiple Raters: Fréchet Variances and Inference.
    Moss J
    Psychometrika; 2024 Jun; 89(2):517-541. PubMed ID: 38190018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Alternative Interpretation of the Linearly Weighted Kappa Coefficients for Ordinal Data.
    Kvålseth TO
    Psychometrika; 2018 May; ():. PubMed ID: 29766350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dependence of weighted kappa coefficients on the number of categories.
    Brenner H; Kliebsch U
    Epidemiology; 1996 Mar; 7(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 8834562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robustness of
    Vanacore A; Pellegrino MS
    Stat Med; 2022 May; 41(11):1986-2004. PubMed ID: 35124830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of Cohen's Kappa and Gwet's AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples.
    Wongpakaran N; Wongpakaran T; Wedding D; Gwet KL
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Apr; 13():61. PubMed ID: 23627889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Weighted least-squares approach for comparing correlated kappa.
    Barnhart HX; Williamson JM
    Biometrics; 2002 Dec; 58(4):1012-9. PubMed ID: 12495157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the inter-rater agreement for ordinal data through weighted indexes.
    Marasini D; Quatto P; Ripamonti E
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec; 25(6):2611-2633. PubMed ID: 24740999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing the Difference of Correlated Agreement Coefficients for Statistical Significance.
    Gwet KL
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Aug; 76(4):609-637. PubMed ID: 29795880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of grey zones on the accuracy of agreement measures for ordinal tables.
    Tran QD; Dolgun A; Demirhan H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):70. PubMed ID: 33853549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Summary measures of agreement and association between many raters' ordinal classifications.
    Mitani AA; Freer PE; Nelson KP
    Ann Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 27(10):677-685.e4. PubMed ID: 29029991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the effects of rater and subject factors on measures of association.
    Nelson KP; Mitani AA; Edwards D
    Biom J; 2018 May; 60(3):639-656. PubMed ID: 29349801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measures of agreement between many raters for ordinal classifications.
    Nelson KP; Edwards D
    Stat Med; 2015 Oct; 34(23):3116-32. PubMed ID: 26095449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration using offline analysis of the transvaginal ultrasound 'sliding sign' technique: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility.
    Reid S; Lu C; Casikar I; Mein B; Magotti R; Ludlow J; Benzie R; Condous G
    Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1237-46. PubMed ID: 23482338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling agreement on categorical scales in the presence of random scorers.
    Vanbelle S; Lesaffre E
    Biostatistics; 2016 Jan; 17(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 26395905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Weighted specific-category kappa measure of interobserver agreement.
    Kvålseth TO
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Dec; 93(3 Pt 2):1283-90. PubMed ID: 14765602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing interrater agreement on binary measurements via intraclass odds ratio.
    Locatelli I; Rousson V
    Biom J; 2016 Jul; 58(4):962-73. PubMed ID: 26988408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interobserver agreement issues in radiology.
    Benchoufi M; Matzner-Lober E; Molinari N; Jannot AS; Soyer P
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Oct; 101(10):639-641. PubMed ID: 32958434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A unified approach for assessing agreement for continuous and categorical data.
    Lin L; Hedayat AS; Wu W
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):629-52. PubMed ID: 17613645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pitfalls in the use of kappa when interpreting agreement between multiple raters in reliability studies.
    O'Leary S; Lund M; Ytre-Hauge TJ; Holm SR; Naess K; Dalland LN; McPhail SM
    Physiotherapy; 2014 Mar; 100(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 24262334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.