These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3105759)
21. In re R (A Minor) (Wardship: Consent to Treatment). Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal Wkly Law Rep; 1991 Jul; 1991 Oct 25():592-608. PubMed ID: 12041269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Re Elizabeth (Ross, Jones J.). Australia. Family Court Fed Law Rep; 1989; 96():248-67. PubMed ID: 17001809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Re Eve. Canada. Supreme Court Dom Law Rep; 1986 Oct; 31():1-37. PubMed ID: 12041087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Re K, W and H (Minors) (Medical Treatment). Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice, Family Division Fam Law Rep; 1992 Sep; 1993():854-9. PubMed ID: 12041092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Non-consensual sterilization of the adult with learning disabilities. Knifton C Br J Nurs; 1998 Oct 22-Nov 11; 7(19):1172-6. PubMed ID: 9866467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Re W (A Minor) (Medical Treatment). Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal, Civil Division All Engl Law Rep; 1992 Jul; [1992]4():627-49. PubMed ID: 11648298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Sterilization--where mentally retarded and presumably fertile daughter cannot understand or exercise her constitutional right to voluntary sterilization, equity court has jurisdiction to empower parents to exercise right on her behalf. Fritschner SH J Fam Law; 1980 Apr; 18(3):648-53. PubMed ID: 11658339 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. T v. T. Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice, Family Division All Engl Law Rep; 1987 Jul; [1988] 1():613-25. PubMed ID: 11648574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Attorney-General (QLD) v. Parents, In re S. Australia. Family Court Fed Law Rep; 1989 Nov; 98():41-56. PubMed ID: 12041104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Re J (A Minor) (Wardship: Medical Treatment). Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal, Civil Division All Engl Law Rep; 1992 Jun; [1992] 4():614-26. PubMed ID: 11648313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. House of Lords upholds decision to sterilise 17-year-old mentally handicapped girl. Brahams D Lancet; 1987 May; 1(8541):1099-100. PubMed ID: 2883441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Re K and Public Trustee. Canada. British Columbia. Court of Appeal Dom Law Rep; 1985 May; 19():255-85. PubMed ID: 12041079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Sterilisation of mentally handicapped adults. Dyer C BMJ; 1988 Dec; 297(6662):1494. PubMed ID: 11644359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Constitutional law--Maryland circuit courts have parens patriae jurisdiction to authorize guardians to consent to sterilization of incompetent minors when the procedure is medically necessary. Eisner LJ Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1982; 11(3):467-75. PubMed ID: 11658447 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. In re Jane, 22 December 1988. Australia. Family Court Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():21-2. PubMed ID: 12289416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Sterilisation, the mentally ill and consent to treatment. Fortin JE Mod Law Rev; 1988 Sep; 51(5):634-42. PubMed ID: 11659136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Sterilisation of a mentally incapable woman. Brahams D Lancet; 1989 Jun; 1(8649):1275-6. PubMed ID: 2566823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Sterilization and medical treatment of the mentally disabled: some legal and ethical reflections. Rivet M Med Law; 1990; 9(5):1150-71. PubMed ID: 2126840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]