BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31057980)

  • 1. Breast Cancer Prognostic Factors in the Digital Era: Comparison of Nottingham Grade using Whole Slide Images and Glass Slides.
    Davidson TM; Rendi MH; Frederick PD; Onega T; Allison KH; Mercan E; Brunyé TT; Shapiro LG; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
    J Pathol Inform; 2019; 10():11. PubMed ID: 31057980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of Digital Pathologic Analysis vs Traditional Microscopy in the Interpretation of Melanocytic Lesions.
    Onega T; Barnhill RL; Piepkorn MW; Longton GM; Elder DE; Weinstock MA; Knezevich SR; Reisch LM; Carney PA; Nelson HD; Radick AC; Elmore JG
    JAMA Dermatol; 2018 Oct; 154(10):1159-1166. PubMed ID: 30140929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Randomized Study Comparing Digital Imaging to Traditional Glass Slide Microscopy for Breast Biopsy and Cancer Diagnosis.
    Elmore JG; Longton GM; Pepe MS; Carney PA; Nelson HD; Allison KH; Geller BM; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Mercan E; Shapiro LG; Brunyé TT; Morgan TR; Weaver DL
    J Pathol Inform; 2017; 8():12. PubMed ID: 28382226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Whole slide imaging for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry interpretation: Accuracy, Precision, and reproducibility studies for digital manual and paired glass slide manual interpretation.
    Wilbur DC; Brachtel EF; Gilbertson JR; Jones NC; Vallone JG; Krishnamurthy S
    J Pathol Inform; 2015; 6():22. PubMed ID: 26110090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital Validation in Breast Cancer Needle Biopsies: Comparison of Histological Grade and Biomarker Expression Assessment Using Conventional Light Microscopy, Whole Slide Imaging, and Digital Image Analysis.
    Choi JE; Kim KH; Lee Y; Kang DW
    J Pers Med; 2024 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 38541054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of Whole Slide Imaging for primary surgical pathology diagnosis of prostate biopsies.
    Rao V; Subramanian P; Sali AP; Menon S; Desai SB
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2021; 64(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 33433413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cytomorphological description and intra-observer agreement in whole slide imaging for canine lymphoma.
    Bonsembiante F; Martini V; Bonfanti U; Casarin G; Trez D; Gelain ME
    Vet J; 2018 Jun; 236():96-101. PubMed ID: 29871757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intra-observer reproducibility of whole slide imaging for the primary diagnosis of breast needle biopsies.
    Reyes C; Ikpatt OF; Nadji M; Cote RJ
    J Pathol Inform; 2014; 5(1):5. PubMed ID: 24741464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic Reproducibility: What Happens When the Same Pathologist Interprets the Same Breast Biopsy Specimen at Two Points in Time?
    Jackson SL; Frederick PD; Pepe MS; Nelson HD; Weaver DL; Allison KH; Carney PA; Geller BM; Tosteson AN; Onega T; Elmore JG
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 May; 24(5):1234-1241. PubMed ID: 27913946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of whole slide images as a diagnostic modality for renal allograft biopsies.
    Jen KY; Olson JL; Brodsky S; Zhou XJ; Nadasdy T; Laszik ZG
    Hum Pathol; 2013 May; 44(5):888-94. PubMed ID: 23199528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concordance in Breast Cancer Grading by Artificial Intelligence on Whole Slide Images Compares With a Multi-Institutional Cohort of Breast Pathologists.
    Mantrala S; Ginter PS; Mitkari A; Joshi S; Prabhala H; Ramachandra V; Kini L; Idress R; D'Alfonso TM; Fineberg S; Jaffer S; Sattar AK; Chagpar AB; Wilson P; Singh K; Harigopal M; Koka D
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Nov; 146(11):1369-1377. PubMed ID: 35271701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of diagnostic accuracy with whole-slide imaging compared with glass slide review in dermatopathology.
    Shah KK; Lehman JS; Gibson LE; Lohse CM; Comfere NI; Wieland CN
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2016 Dec; 75(6):1229-1237. PubMed ID: 27742174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital Whole Slide Imaging Compared With Light Microscopy for Primary Diagnosis in Surgical Pathology.
    Borowsky AD; Glassy EF; Wallace WD; Kallichanda NS; Behling CA; Miller DV; Oswal HN; Feddersen RM; Bakhtar OR; Mendoza AE; Molden DP; Saffer HL; Wixom CR; Albro JE; Cessna MH; Hall BJ; Lloyd IE; Bishop JW; Darrow MA; Gui D; Jen KY; Walby JAS; Bauer SM; Cortez DA; Gandhi P; Rodgers MM; Rodriguez RA; Martin DR; McConnell TG; Reynolds SJ; Spigel JH; Stepenaskie SA; Viktorova E; Magari R; Wharton KA; Qiu J; Bauer TW
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2020 Oct; 144(10):1245-1253. PubMed ID: 32057275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The histopathological diagnosis of atypical meningioma: glass slide versus whole slide imaging for grading assessment.
    Ammendola S; Bariani E; Eccher A; Capitanio A; Ghimenton C; Pantanowitz L; Parwani A; Girolami I; Scarpa A; Barresi V
    Virchows Arch; 2021 Apr; 478(4):747-756. PubMed ID: 33305338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital vs traditional: Are diagnostic accuracy rates similar for glass slides vs whole slide images in a non-gynaecological external quality assurance setting?
    Ross J; Greaves J; Earls P; Shulruf B; Van Es SL
    Cytopathology; 2018 Aug; 29(4):326-334. PubMed ID: 29665117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic Accuracy of Virtual Pathology vs Traditional Microscopy in a Large Dermatopathology Study.
    Kent MN; Olsen TG; Feeser TA; Tesno KC; Moad JC; Conroy MP; Kendrick MJ; Stephenson SR; Murchland MR; Khan AU; Peacock EA; Brumfiel A; Bottomley MA
    JAMA Dermatol; 2017 Dec; 153(12):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 29049424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic validation of a portable whole slide imaging scanner for lymphoma diagnosis in resource-constrained setting: A cross-sectional study.
    Mremi A; Achola C; Mbwambo D; Magorosa E; Legason ID; Vavoulis D; El Mouden C; Schuh A; Mnango L;
    J Pathol Inform; 2023; 14():100188. PubMed ID: 36714453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of whole slide imaging for frozen section diagnosis of lymph node metastasis: A retrospective study from a tertiary care hospital in Thailand.
    Kantasiripitak C; Laohawetwanit T; Apornvirat S; Niemnapa K
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2022 Oct; 60():151987. PubMed ID: 35700561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes in pathology: guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center.
    Pantanowitz L; Sinard JH; Henricks WH; Fatheree LA; Carter AB; Contis L; Beckwith BA; Evans AJ; Lal A; Parwani AV;
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Dec; 137(12):1710-22. PubMed ID: 23634907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Precise Identification of Cell and Tissue Features Important for Histopathologic Diagnosis by a Whole Slide Imaging System.
    Bauer TW; Behling C; Miller DV; Chang BS; Viktorova E; Magari R; Jensen PE; Wharton KA; Qiu J
    J Pathol Inform; 2020; 11():3. PubMed ID: 32154040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.