These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31059836)

  • 1. Evaluation of an online website-based platform for cephalometric analysis.
    Alqahtani H
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Feb; 121(1):53-57. PubMed ID: 31059836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Web-based Fully Automated Cephalometric Analysis: Comparisons between App-aided, Computerized, and Manual Tracings.
    Meriç P; Naoumova J
    Turk J Orthod; 2020 Sep; 33(3):142-149. PubMed ID: 32974059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of fully automated cephalometric measurements obtained from web-based artificial intelligence driven platform.
    Mahto RK; Kafle D; Giri A; Luintel S; Karki A
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Apr; 22(1):132. PubMed ID: 35440037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of cephalometric measurements obtained using conventional and digital methods.
    Vithanaarachchi N; Chandrasiri A; Nawarathna L
    Ceylon Med J; 2020 Sep; 65(3):39-45. PubMed ID: 34800930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements obtained from digital photographs of analogue headfilms.
    Grybauskas S; Balciuniene I; Vetra J
    Stomatologija; 2007; 9(4):114-20. PubMed ID: 18303276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses.
    Uysal T; Baysal A; Yagci A
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 19443692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between cephalometric measurements using digital manual and web-based artificial intelligence cephalometric tracing software.
    Çoban G; Öztürk T; Hashimli N; Yağci A
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2022; 27(4):e222112. PubMed ID: 35976288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy and clinical validity of automated cephalometric analysis using convolutional neural networks.
    Kang S; Kim I; Kim YJ; Kim N; Baek SH; Sung SJ
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2024 Feb; 27(1):64-77. PubMed ID: 37326233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of cephalometric analysis using a non-radiographic sonic digitizer (DigiGraph Workstation) with conventional radiography.
    Tsang KH; Cooke MS
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Feb; 21(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 10191573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities.
    Wen J; Liu S; Ye X; Xie X; Li J; Li H; Mei L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Dec; 148(12):913-921. PubMed ID: 29042006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cephalometric analysis performance discrepancy between orthodontists and an artificial intelligence model using lateral cephalometric radiographs.
    Guinot-Barona C; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J; Galán López L; Barmak AB; Att W; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Apr; 36(4):555-565. PubMed ID: 37882509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The reliability and reproducibility of an Android cephalometric smartphone application in comparison with the conventional method.
    Zamrik OM; İşeri H
    Angle Orthod; 2021 Mar; 91(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 33367490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis.
    Celik E; Polat-Ozsoy O; Toygar Memikoglu TU
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 19237509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The accuracy and reliability of WebCeph for cephalometric analysis.
    Yassir YA; Salman AR; Nabbat SA
    J Taibah Univ Med Sci; 2022 Feb; 17(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 35140566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of Frankfort Horizontal Plane with True Horizontal Plane in Cephalometric Measurements.
    Devi SS; Dinesh S; Sivakumar A; Nivethigaa B; Alshehri A; Awadh W; Alam MK; Bhandi S; Raj AT; Patil S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Sep; 23(6):601-605. PubMed ID: 36259298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of 3-dimensional computer-generated cephalometric measurements.
    Kusnoto B; Evans CA; BeGole EA; de Rijk W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):390-9. PubMed ID: 10511666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of cephalometric measurements between conventional and automatic cephalometric analysis using convolutional neural network.
    Jeon S; Lee KC
    Prog Orthod; 2021 May; 22(1):14. PubMed ID: 34056670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of a tridimensional cephalometric analysis performed on 3T-MRI compared with CBCT: a pilot study in adults.
    Maspero C; Abate A; Bellincioni F; Cavagnetto D; Lanteri V; Costa A; Farronato M
    Prog Orthod; 2019 Oct; 20(1):40. PubMed ID: 31631241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in cephalometric measurements: a comparison of digital versus hand-tracing methods.
    Polat-Ozsoy O; Gokcelik A; Toygar Memikoglu TU
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 19349417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.