These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31059976)

  • 41. Spatial transposition gradients in visual working memory.
    Rerko L; Oberauer K; Lin HY
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 23663175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Dissociative effects of orthographic distinctiveness in pure and mixed lists: an item-order account.
    McDaniel MA; Cahill M; Bugg JM; Meadow NG
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Oct; 39(7):1162-73. PubMed ID: 21584853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Local temporal distinctiveness does not benefit auditory verbal and spatial serial recall.
    Parmentier FB; King S; Dennis I
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Jun; 13(3):458-65. PubMed ID: 17048731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Concreteness effects in short-term memory: a test of the item-order hypothesis.
    Roche J; Tolan GA; Tehan G
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Dec; 65(4):245-53. PubMed ID: 21823786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Judgements of relative direction: the effect of task instructions on spatial recall.
    Donaldson P; Tlauka M; Robertson C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Jun; 66(6):1090-103. PubMed ID: 23057609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Multiple species of distinctiveness in memory? Comparing encoding versus statistical distinctiveness on recognition.
    Gretz MR; Huff MJ
    Memory; 2020 Sep; 28(8):984-997. PubMed ID: 32892708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Remembered study mode: support for the distinctiveness account of the production effect.
    Ozubko JD; Major J; MacLeod CM
    Memory; 2014; 22(5):509-24. PubMed ID: 23713784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evidence for attentional gradient in the serial position memory curve from event-related potentials.
    Azizian A; Polich J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 19(12):2071-81. PubMed ID: 17892393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Secondary distinctiveness effects: Orthographic distinctiveness and bizarreness effects make independent contributions to memory performance.
    Gounden Y; Cerroti F; Nicolas S
    Scand J Psychol; 2017 Feb; 58(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 27859302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A spatial modality effect in serial memory.
    Tremblay S; Parmentier FB; Guérard K; Nicholls AP; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1208-15. PubMed ID: 16938058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Competitive retrieval strategy causes multimodal response distributions in multiple-cue judgments.
    Albrecht R; Hoffmann JA; Pleskac TJ; Rieskamp J; von Helversen B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jun; 46(6):1064-1090. PubMed ID: 31750721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Metacognition and false recognition in patients with frontal lobe lesions: the distinctiveness heuristic.
    Budson AE; Dodson CS; Vatner JM; Daffner KR; Black PM; Schacter DL
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(6):860-71. PubMed ID: 15716158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Distinctiveness revisited: unpredictable temporal isolation does not benefit short-term serial recall of heard or seen events.
    Nimmo LM; Lewandowsky S
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1368-75. PubMed ID: 17225515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Ageing and secondary-distinctiveness-based effects: the orthographic distinctiveness effect is more robust than the bizarreness effect.
    Gounden Y; Nicolas S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(9):1820-32. PubMed ID: 22524538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. What causes the isolation effect?
    Hunt RR; Lamb CA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Nov; 27(6):1359-66. PubMed ID: 11713872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Further evidence that similar principles govern recall from episodic and semantic memory: the Canadian prime ministerial serial position function.
    Neath I; Saint-Aubin J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Jun; 65(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 21668089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Empirical analysis of the intrinsic-extrinsic distinction of judgments of learning (JOLs): effects of relatedness and serial position on JOLs.
    Dunlosky J; Matvey G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1180-91. PubMed ID: 11550746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Recognition and frequency judgments in young and elderly adults.
    Freund JS; Witte KL
    Am J Psychol; 1986; 99(1):81-102. PubMed ID: 3717457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Judgments of learning do not reduce to memory encoding operations: event-related potential evidence for distinct metacognitive processes.
    Skavhaug IM; Wilding EL; Donaldson DI
    Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 1318():87-95. PubMed ID: 19968975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Ineffectiveness of visual distinctiveness in enhancing immediate recall.
    McDowd J; Madigan S
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Jul; 19(4):371-7. PubMed ID: 1895947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.