These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31061052)

  • 1. Investigating the feasibility of a patient feedback tool to improve safety in Australian primary care: a study protocol.
    Hernan AL; Kloot K; Giles SJ; Beks H; McNamara K; Binder MJ; Versace V
    BMJ Open; 2019 May; 9(5):e027327. PubMed ID: 31061052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developing a primary care patient measure of safety (PC PMOS): a modified Delphi process and face validity testing.
    Hernan AL; Giles SJ; O'Hara JK; Fuller J; Johnson JK; Dunbar JA
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2016 Apr; 25(4):273-80. PubMed ID: 26141502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of the Primary Care Patient Measure of Safety (PC PMOS) questionnaire.
    Giles SJ; Parveen S; Hernan AL
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2019 May; 28(5):389-396. PubMed ID: 30337498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and evaluation of an intervention based on the provision of patient feedback to improve patient safety in Spanish primary healthcare centres: study protocol.
    Serrano-Ripoll MJ; Ripoll J; Llobera J; Valderas JM; Pastor-Moreno G; Olry de Labry Lima A; Ricci-Cabello I
    BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e031367. PubMed ID: 31874872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient feedback for safety improvement in primary care: results from a feasibility study.
    Hernan AL; Giles SJ; Beks H; McNamara K; Kloot K; Binder MJ; Versace V
    BMJ Open; 2020 Jun; 10(6):e037887. PubMed ID: 32565479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implementing a survey for patients to provide safety experience feedback following a care transition: a feasibility study.
    Scott J; Heavey E; Waring J; De Brún A; Dawson P
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Aug; 19(1):613. PubMed ID: 31470853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Protocol for a non-randomised feasibility study evaluating a codesigned patient safety guide in primary care.
    Morris RL; Gallacher K; Hann M; Rolfe C; Small N; Giles SJ; Sanders C; Campbell SM
    BMJ Open; 2021 Jan; 11(1):e039752. PubMed ID: 33472773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving health system responses when patients are harmed: a protocol for a multistage mixed-methods study.
    Hibbert PD; Raggett L; Molloy CJ; Westbrook J; Magrabi F; Mumford V; Clay-Williams R; Lingam R; Salmon PM; Middleton S; Roberts M; Bradd P; Bowden S; Ryan K; Zacka M; Sketcher-Baker K; Phillips A; Birks L; Arya DK; Trevorrow C; Handa S; Swaminathan G; Carson-Stevens A; Wiig S; de Wet C; Austin EE; Nic Giolla Easpaig B; Wang Y; Arnolda G; Peterson GM; Braithwaite J
    BMJ Open; 2024 Jul; 14(7):e085854. PubMed ID: 38969384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Protocol for the process and feasibility evaluations of a new model of primary care service delivery for managing pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis (PARTNER) using a mixed methods approach.
    Bowden JL; Egerton T; Hinman RS; Bennell KL; Briggs AM; Bunker SJ; Kasza J; French SD; Pirotta M; Schofield DJ; Zwar NA; Hunter DJ
    BMJ Open; 2020 Feb; 10(2):e034526. PubMed ID: 32024793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient Reporting of Safety experiences in Organisational Care Transfers (PRoSOCT): a feasibility study of a patient reporting tool as a proactive approach to identifying latent conditions within healthcare systems.
    Scott J; Waring J; Heavey E; Dawson P
    BMJ Open; 2014 May; 4(5):e005416. PubMed ID: 24833698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Older, vulnerable patient view: a pilot and feasibility study of the patient measure of safety (PMOS) with patients in Australia.
    Taylor N; Hogden E; Clay-Williams R; Li Z; Lawton R; Braithwaite J
    BMJ Open; 2016 Jun; 6(6):e011069. PubMed ID: 27279478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety in primary care (SAP-C): a randomised, controlled feasibility study in two different healthcare systems.
    Madden C; Lydon S; Cupples ME; Hart ND; Curran C; Murphy AW; O'Connor P
    BMC Fam Pract; 2019 Jan; 20(1):22. PubMed ID: 30700257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influences on the adoption of patient safety innovation in primary care: a qualitative exploration of staff perspectives.
    Litchfield I; Gill P; Avery T; Campbell S; Perryman K; Marsden K; Greenfield S
    BMC Fam Pract; 2018 May; 19(1):72. PubMed ID: 29788906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient involvement in patient safety: Protocol for developing an intervention using patient reports of organisational safety and patient incident reporting.
    Ward JK; McEachan RR; Lawton R; Armitage G; Watt I; Wright J;
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2011 May; 11():130. PubMed ID: 21619575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cluster randomized, controlled trial on patient safety improvement in general practice: a study protocol.
    Verbakel NJ; Langelaan M; Verheij TJ; Wagner C; Zwart DL
    BMC Fam Pract; 2013 Aug; 14():127. PubMed ID: 23984840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Collective leadership and safety cultures (Co-Lead): protocol for a mixed-methods pilot evaluation of the impact of a co-designed collective leadership intervention on team performance and safety culture in a hospital group in Ireland.
    McAuliffe E; De Brún A; Ward M; O'Shea M; Cunningham U; O'Donovan R; McGinley S; Fitzsimons J; Corrigan S; McDonald N
    BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e017569. PubMed ID: 29101137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Primary Care Practice Improvement Tool (PC-PIT) process for organisational improvement in primary care: application by Australian Primary Health Networks.
    Borg SJ; Crossland L; Risk J; Porritt J; Jackson CL
    Aust J Prim Health; 2019 Apr; 25(2):185-191. PubMed ID: 30819323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A multifaceted quality improvement intervention for CVD risk management in Australian primary healthcare: a protocol for a process evaluation.
    Patel B; Patel A; Jan S; Usherwood T; Harris M; Panaretto K; Zwar N; Redfern J; Jansen J; Doust J; Peiris D
    Implement Sci; 2014 Dec; 9():187. PubMed ID: 25515217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Delivering safe and effective test-result communication, management and follow-up: a mixed-methods study protocol.
    Dahm MR; Georgiou A; Westbrook JI; Greenfield D; Horvath AR; Wakefield D; Li L; Hillman K; Bolton P; Brown A; Jones G; Herkes R; Lindeman R; Legg M; Makeham M; Moses D; Badmus D; Campbell C; Hardie RA; Li J; McCaughey E; Sezgin G; Thomas J; Wabe N
    BMJ Open; 2018 Feb; 8(2):e020235. PubMed ID: 29449297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Theorizing Factors Mediating With the Implementation of a Patient Feedback on Safety Intervention Implemented in the Primary Care Setting.
    Beks H; Hernan AL; Giles S; Malakellis M; Mc Namara KP; Versace VL
    Qual Health Res; 2021 Oct; 31(12):2260-2273. PubMed ID: 34238061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.