These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31061993)

  • 1. Evidence-based concepts and procedures for bonded inlays and onlays. Part III. A case series with long-term clinical results and follow-up.
    Dietschi D; Spreafico R
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2019; 14(2):118-133. PubMed ID: 31061993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 10785294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: 5-year follow-up.
    Wassell RW; Walls AW; McCabe JF
    J Dent; 2000 Aug; 28(6):375-82. PubMed ID: 10856800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A four to six years follow-up of indirect resin composite inlays/onlays.
    Leirskar J; Nordbø H; Thoresen NR; Henaug T; von der Fehr FR
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2003 Aug; 61(4):247-51. PubMed ID: 14582594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence-based concepts and procedures for bonded inlays and onlays. Part I. Historical perspectives and clinical rationale for a biosubstitutive approach.
    Dietschi D; Spreafico R
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2015; 10(2):210-27. PubMed ID: 25874270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series.
    Otto T; Schneider D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 18350948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of indirect resin composite and ceramic onlays over a 24-month period.
    Kaytan B; Onal B; Pamir T; Tezel H
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 16252535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adhesive Cementation of Indirect Composite Inlays and Onlays: A Literature Review.
    D'Arcangelo C; Vanini L; Casinelli M; Frascaria M; De Angelis F; Vadini M; D'Amario M
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2015 Sep; 36(8):570-7; quiz 578. PubMed ID: 26355440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct versus indirect inlay/onlay composite restorations in posterior teeth. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Angeletaki F; Gkogkos A; Papazoglou E; Kloukos D
    J Dent; 2016 Oct; 53():12-21. PubMed ID: 27452342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years.
    Krämer N; Frankenberger R
    Dent Mater; 2005 Mar; 21(3):262-71. PubMed ID: 15705433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior.
    Frankenberger R; Petschelt A; Krämer N
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 11203857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Luting of inlays, onlays, and overlays with preheated restorative composite resin does not prevent seating accuracy.
    Magne P; Razaghy M; Carvalho MA; Soares LM
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2018; 13(3):318-332. PubMed ID: 30073216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: two-year clinical follow up.
    Coelho Santos MJ; Mondelli RF; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 15088722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: five-year follow-up.
    Santos MJ; Mondelli RF; Navarro MF; Francischone CE; Rubo JH; Santos GC
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 22856680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence-based concepts and procedures for bonded inlays and onlays. Part II. Guidelines for cavity preparation and restoration fabrication.
    Rocca GT; Rizcalla N; Krejci I; Dietschi D
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2015; 10(3):392-413. PubMed ID: 26171443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adhesive cementation of chairside CAD/CAM inlays and onlays.
    Blatz MB; Ripps A; Sadan A; Holst S
    Dent Today; 2006 Jan; 25(1):60, 62-5; quiz 65. PubMed ID: 16471400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Esthetic inlays and onlays.
    Jackson RD
    Curr Opin Cosmet Dent; 1994; ():30-9. PubMed ID: 8032438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: a systematic review.
    Fron Chabouis H; Smail Faugeron V; Attal JP
    Dent Mater; 2013 Dec; 29(12):1209-18. PubMed ID: 24119328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.