451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31062173)
1. Cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine alone in elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer from Chinese societal perspective.
Zhang PF; Wen F; Zhou J; Huang JX; Zhou KX; Wu QJ; Wang XY; Zhang MX; Liao WT; Li Q
Clin Transl Oncol; 2020 Jan; 22(1):103-110. PubMed ID: 31062173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of Maintenance Capecitabine and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Sherman SK; Lange JJ; Dahdaleh FS; Rajeev R; Gamblin TC; Polite BN; Turaga KK
JAMA Oncol; 2019 Feb; 5(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 30489611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bevacizumab plus Paclitaxel versus Bevacizumab plus Capecitabine for HER2-Negative Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Wu Q; Wang X; Zhang M; Liao W; Wang F; Li Q
Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(4):153-159. PubMed ID: 32187596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness analysis of utidelone plus capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer in China.
Liao M; Jiang Q; Hu H; Han J; She L; Yao L; Ding D; Huang J
J Med Econ; 2019 Jun; 22(6):584-592. PubMed ID: 30808230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness analysis of fruquintinib as third-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Zhang PF; Xie D; Li Q
Tumori; 2020 Oct; 106(5):400-405. PubMed ID: 32354261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systematic review and economic evaluation of bevacizumab and cetuximab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Tappenden P; Jones R; Paisley S; Carroll C
Health Technol Assess; 2007 Mar; 11(12):1-128, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 17346499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of Capecitabine + Irinotecan Versus Leucovorin + Fluorouracil + Irinotecan in the Second-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in China.
Wu Q; Zhang P; Wang X; Zhang M; Liao W; Li Q
Clin Ther; 2020 Nov; 42(11):2148-2158.e2. PubMed ID: 32981743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Panitumumab Plus FOLFIRI for the Second-Line Treatment of Patients with Wild-Type Ras Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Shi Y; Wan X; Tan C; Li J; Peng L
Adv Ther; 2020 Feb; 37(2):847-859. PubMed ID: 31902066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of capecitabine and bevacizumab maintenance treatment after first-line induction treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Franken MD; van Rooijen EM; May AM; Koffijberg H; van Tinteren H; Mol L; Ten Tije AJ; Creemers GJ; van der Velden AMT; Tanis BC; Uyl-de Groot CA; Punt CJA; Koopman M; van Oijen MGH
Eur J Cancer; 2017 Apr; 75():204-212. PubMed ID: 28237866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-Effectiveness of Treatment Sequences of Chemotherapies and Targeted Biologics for Elderly Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients.
Parikh RC; Du XL; Robert MO; Lairson DR
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2017 Jan; 23(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 28025930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Graham CN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; de Liège F; Lanier J; Knox H; Barber B
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Nov; 50(16):2791-801. PubMed ID: 25219451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer based on the TAILOR trial.
Wang H; Huang L; Gao P; Zhu Z; Ye W; Ding H; Fang L
BMJ Open; 2020 Feb; 10(2):e030738. PubMed ID: 32051297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First-Line FOLFIRI Combined With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab in Patients With RAS Wild-Type Left-Sided Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Han J; Xiao D; Tan C; Zeng X; Hu H; Zeng S; Jiang Q; She L; Yao L; Li L; Tang L; Ma J; Huang J; Shen L
Cancer Control; 2020; 27(1):1073274820902271. PubMed ID: 32107929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. First- and second-line bevacizumab in addition to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a United States-based cost-effectiveness analysis.
Goldstein DA; Chen Q; Ayer T; Howard DH; Lipscomb J; El-Rayes BF; Flowers CR
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Apr; 33(10):1112-8. PubMed ID: 25691669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Panitumumab Plus mFOLFOX6 Compared to Bevacizumab Plus mFOLFOX6 for First-line Treatment of Patients with Wild-type RAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer--Czech Republic Model Adaptation].
Fínek J; Skoupá J; Jandová P
Klin Onkol; 2015; 28(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 26299740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib for Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Zhang X; Wang J; Shi J; Jia X; Dang S; Wang W
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Apr; 4(4):e214846. PubMed ID: 33825837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Su D; Wu B; Shi L
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e210037. PubMed ID: 33625508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Regorafenib and TAS-102 in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the United States.
Cho SK; Hay JW; Barzi A
Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2018 Dec; 17(4):e751-e761. PubMed ID: 30228027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC Compared With Systemic Chemotherapy in Isolated Peritoneal Carcinomatosis From Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Hamilton TD; MacNeill AJ; Lim H; Hunink MGM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Apr; 26(4):1110-1117. PubMed ID: 30690682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cabazitaxel for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer after docetaxel and androgen-signaling-targeted inhibitor resistance.
Zhang PF; Xie D; Li Q
BMC Cancer; 2021 Jan; 21(1):35. PubMed ID: 33413230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
