These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31062321)

  • 1. Cell Fate Engineering Tools for iPSC Disease Modeling.
    Lo EKW; Cahan P
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1975():427-454. PubMed ID: 31062321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of engineered cells using CellNet and RNA-seq.
    Radley AH; Schwab RM; Tan Y; Kim J; Lo EKW; Cahan P
    Nat Protoc; 2017 May; 12(5):1089-1102. PubMed ID: 28448485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Platform-agnostic CellNet enables cross-study analysis of cell fate engineering protocols.
    Lo EKW; Velazquez JJ; Peng D; Kwon C; Ebrahimkhani MR; Cahan P
    Stem Cell Reports; 2023 Aug; 18(8):1721-1742. PubMed ID: 37478860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dissecting engineered cell types and enhancing cell fate conversion via CellNet.
    Morris SA; Cahan P; Li H; Zhao AM; San Roman AK; Shivdasani RA; Collins JJ; Daley GQ
    Cell; 2014 Aug; 158(4):889-902. PubMed ID: 25126792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A systems biology pipeline identifies regulatory networks for stem cell engineering.
    Kinney MA; Vo LT; Frame JM; Barragan J; Conway AJ; Li S; Wong KK; Collins JJ; Cahan P; North TE; Lauffenburger DA; Daley GQ
    Nat Biotechnol; 2019 Jul; 37(7):810-818. PubMed ID: 31267104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing in vitro human liver models to in vivo human liver using RNA-Seq.
    Gupta R; Schrooders Y; Hauser D; van Herwijnen M; Albrecht W; Ter Braak B; Brecklinghaus T; Castell JV; Elenschneider L; Escher S; Guye P; Hengstler JG; Ghallab A; Hansen T; Leist M; Maclennan R; Moritz W; Tolosa L; Tricot T; Verfaillie C; Walker P; van de Water B; Kleinjans J; Caiment F
    Arch Toxicol; 2021 Feb; 95(2):573-589. PubMed ID: 33106934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CellNet: network biology applied to stem cell engineering.
    Cahan P; Li H; Morris SA; Lummertz da Rocha E; Daley GQ; Collins JJ
    Cell; 2014 Aug; 158(4):903-915. PubMed ID: 25126793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computational Analysis of Altering Cell Fate.
    Abdallah HM; Del Vecchio D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1975():363-405. PubMed ID: 31062319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CellNet--where your cells are standing.
    Kim KP; Schöler HR
    Cell; 2014 Aug; 158(4):699-701. PubMed ID: 25126778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bioinformatics Analysis of Single-Cell RNA-Seq Raw Data from iPSC-Derived Neural Stem Cells.
    Kim J; Daadi MM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1919():145-159. PubMed ID: 30656627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating Cell Fate Decisions with ICGS Analysis of Single Cells.
    Salomonis N
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1975():251-275. PubMed ID: 31062314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Model Testing of PluriTest with Next-Generation Sequencing Data.
    Schulze M; Hoja S; Winner B; Winkler J; Edenhofer F; Riemenschneider MJ
    Stem Cells Dev; 2016 Apr; 25(7):569-71. PubMed ID: 26978076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lineage Inference and Stem Cell Identity Prediction Using Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing Data.
    Sagar ; Grün D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1975():277-301. PubMed ID: 31062315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The evolving field of induced pluripotency: recent progress and future challenges.
    Sommer CA; Mostoslavsky G
    J Cell Physiol; 2013 Feb; 228(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 22767332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The UEA Small RNA Workbench: A Suite of Computational Tools for Small RNA Analysis.
    Mohorianu I; Stocks MB; Applegate CS; Folkes L; Moulton V
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1580():193-224. PubMed ID: 28439835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computational Biology Methods for Characterization of Pluripotent Cells.
    Araúzo-Bravo MJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1357():195-220. PubMed ID: 26141313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biological computational approaches: new hopes to improve (re)programming robustness, regenerative medicine and cancer therapeutics.
    Ebrahimi B
    Differentiation; 2016; 92(1-2):35-40. PubMed ID: 27056282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computational Analysis of Aneuploidy in Pluripotent Stem Cells.
    Weissbein U
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1975():407-426. PubMed ID: 31062320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Induced neural lineage cells as repair kits: so close, yet so far away.
    Mirakhori F; Zeynali B; Salekdeh GH; Baharvand H
    J Cell Physiol; 2014 Jun; 229(6):728-42. PubMed ID: 24242901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cell population structure prior to bifurcation predicts efficiency of directed differentiation in human induced pluripotent cells.
    Bargaje R; Trachana K; Shelton MN; McGinnis CS; Zhou JX; Chadick C; Cook S; Cavanaugh C; Huang S; Hood L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Feb; 114(9):2271-2276. PubMed ID: 28167799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.