323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31062521)
1. Impact of surgical approach on short-term oncological outcomes and recovery following low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Hyde LZ; Baser O; Mehendale S; Guo D; Shah M; Kiran RP
Colorectal Dis; 2019 Aug; 21(8):932-942. PubMed ID: 31062521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010-2015).
Chapman BC; Edgcomb M; Gleisner A; Vogel JD
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4754-4771. PubMed ID: 31728754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Oncologic Outcomes.
Speicher PJ; Englum BR; Ganapathi AM; Nussbaum DP; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):1040-5. PubMed ID: 25405559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Low Anterior Resection: Equivalent Survival in a National Analysis of 14,033 Patients With Rectal Cancer.
Sun Z; Kim J; Adam MA; Nussbaum DP; Speicher PJ; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
Ann Surg; 2016 Jun; 263(6):1152-8. PubMed ID: 26501702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer: An analysis of the Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA).
van Harten MJ; Greenwood EB; Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Hunter RA; Kroon HM; Sammour T
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1649-1655. PubMed ID: 32312590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Comparison of Pathologic Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Resections for Rectal Cancer Using the ACS-NSQIP Proctectomy-Targeted Database: a Propensity Score Analysis.
Garfinkle R; Abou-Khalil M; Bhatnagar S; Wong-Chong N; Azoulay L; Morin N; Vasilevsky CA; Boutros M
J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Feb; 23(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 30264386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Proctectomy Outcomes: An ACS-NSQIP Analysis.
Hu KY; Wu R; Szabo A; Ridolfi TJ; Ludwig KA; Peterson CY
J Surg Res; 2020 Nov; 255():495-501. PubMed ID: 32622164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prolonged hospital stay and readmission rate in an enhanced recovery after surgery cohort undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.
Bennedsen ALB; Eriksen JR; Gögenur I
Colorectal Dis; 2018 Dec; 20(12):1097-1108. PubMed ID: 30307103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic versus open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: results from the national cancer data base.
Nussbaum DP; Speicher PJ; Ganapathi AM; Englum BR; Keenan JE; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
J Gastrointest Surg; 2015 Jan; 19(1):124-31; discussion 131-2. PubMed ID: 25091847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic vs laparoscopic rectal tumour surgery: a cohort study.
Asklid D; Gerjy R; Hjern F; Pekkari K; Gustafsson UO
Colorectal Dis; 2019 Feb; 21(2):191-199. PubMed ID: 30428153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Resection for Mid and Low Rectal Cancers.
Bedirli A; Salman B; Yuksel O
JSLS; 2016; 20(1):. PubMed ID: 27081292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes with laparoscopic and open surgeries.
Perdawood SK; Thinggaard BS; Bjoern MX
Surg Endosc; 2018 May; 32(5):2312-2321. PubMed ID: 29098433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and traditional laparoscopic low anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.
Feng Q; Ng SSM; Zhang Z; Lin S; Niu Z; Wei Y; He G; Chang W; Zhu D; Xu J
J Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 124(4):607-618. PubMed ID: 34076898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic vs laparoscopic rectal surgery in high-risk patients.
Ahmed J; Cao H; Panteleimonitis S; Khan J; Parvaiz A
Colorectal Dis; 2017 Dec; 19(12):1092-1099. PubMed ID: 28644545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing pathologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic Surgery in rectal cancer resection: a propensity adjusted analysis of 7616 patients.
Hopkins MB; Geiger TM; Bethurum AJ; Ford MM; Muldoon RL; Beck DE; Stewart TG; Hawkins AT
Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2613-2622. PubMed ID: 31346754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally Invasive Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Outcomes and Morbidity.
Taylor JP; Stem M; Althumairi AA; Gearhart SL; Safar B; Fang SH; Efron JE
World J Surg; 2020 Sep; 44(9):3130-3140. PubMed ID: 32383054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic vs. robotic rectal cancer surgery and the effect on conversion rates: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score-matched studies.
Phan K; Kahlaee HR; Kim SH; Toh JWT
Tech Coloproctol; 2019 Mar; 23(3):221-230. PubMed ID: 30623315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.
Law WL; Foo DCC
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2798-2807. PubMed ID: 27785627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Independent Predictors of Increased Operative Time and Hospital Length of Stay Are Consistent Across Different Surgical Approaches to Pancreatoduodenectomy.
Xourafas D; Pawlik TM; Cloyd JM
J Gastrointest Surg; 2018 Nov; 22(11):1911-1919. PubMed ID: 29943136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
