152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31063419)
1. Comparison of Positive Predictive Values of Categorization of Suspicious Calcifications Using the 4th and 5th Editions of BI-RADS.
Park GE; Kim SH; Lee JM; Kang BJ; Chae BJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Sep; 213(3):710-715. PubMed ID: 31063419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of malignancy risk stratification of microcalcifications detected on mammography: a study based on the 5th edition of BI-RADS.
Kim SY; Kim HY; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):2895-901. PubMed ID: 25608770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Calcifications with suspicious morphology at mammography: should they all be considered with the same clinical significance?
Choi WJ; Han K; Shin HJ; Lee J; Kim EK; Yoon JH
Eur Radiol; 2021 Apr; 31(4):2529-2538. PubMed ID: 32960330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. "Category 4A" microcalcifications: how should this subcategory be applied to microcalcifications seen on mammography?
Kim J; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH
Acta Radiol; 2018 Feb; 59(2):147-153. PubMed ID: 28490180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Qualitative Radiogenomics: Association Between BI-RADS Calcification Descriptors and Recurrence Risk as Assessed by the Oncotype DX Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Score.
Woodard GA; Price ER
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Apr; 212(4):919-924. PubMed ID: 30714832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast microcalcifications: the UK RCR 5-point breast imaging system or BI-RADS; which is the better predictor of malignancy?
Metaxa L; Healy NA; O'Keeffe SA
Br J Radiol; 2019 Nov; 92(1103):20190177. PubMed ID: 31365279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of microcalcification descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy.
Burnside ES; Ochsner JE; Fowler KJ; Fine JP; Salkowski LR; Rubin DL; Sisney GA
Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):388-95. PubMed ID: 17255409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scoring system based on BI-RADS lexicon to predict probability of malignancy in suspicious microcalcifications.
Youk JH; Son EJ; Kim JA; Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Choi CH; Kim EK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 19(5):1491-8. PubMed ID: 22173328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories.
Bent CK; Bassett LW; D'Orsi CJ; Sayre JW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 May; 194(5):1378-83. PubMed ID: 20410428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Usefulness and limitations of the Japan Mammography Guidelines for the categorization of microcalcifications.
Uematsu T; Kasami M; Yuen S
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 18288569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Visual Assessment of Breast Density in BI-RADS 4th and 5th Editions With Automated Volumetric Measurement.
Youk JH; Kim SJ; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):703-708. PubMed ID: 28657850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Scoring System to Stratify Malignancy Risks for Mammographic Microcalcifications Based on Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 5th Edition Descriptors.
Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Eun NL; Choi EJ; Kim JA
Korean J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 20(12):1646-1652. PubMed ID: 31854152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A matrix of morphology and distribution of calcifications in the breast: Analysis of 849 vacuum-assisted biopsies.
Kaltenbach B; Brandenbusch V; Möbus V; Mall G; Falk S; van den Bergh M; Chevalier F; Müller-Schimpfle M
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 86():221-226. PubMed ID: 28027751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection and diagnosis of automated breast ultrasound in patients with BI-RADS category 4 microcalcifications: a retrospective study.
Yu LF; Dai CC; Zhu LX; Xu XJ; Yan HJ; Jiang CX; Bao LY
BMC Med Imaging; 2024 May; 24(1):126. PubMed ID: 38807064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammographic morphology and distribution of calcifications in ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed in organized screening.
Hofvind S; Iversen BF; Eriksen L; Styr BM; Kjellevold K; Kurz KD
Acta Radiol; 2011 Jun; 52(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 21498306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. AI-CAD for differentiating lesions presenting as calcifications only on mammography: outcome analysis incorporating the ACR BI-RADS descriptors for calcifications.
Yoon J; Lee HS; Kim MJ; Park VY; Kim EK; Yoon JH
Eur Radiol; 2022 Oct; 32(10):6565-6574. PubMed ID: 35748900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inter-reader Variability in the Use of BI-RADS Descriptors for Suspicious Findings on Diagnostic Mammography: A Multi-institution Study of 10 Academic Radiologists.
Lee AY; Wisner DJ; Aminololama-Shakeri S; Arasu VA; Feig SA; Hargreaves J; Ojeda-Fournier H; Bassett LW; Wells CJ; De Guzman J; Flowers CI; Campbell JE; Elson SL; Retallack H; Joe BN
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):60-66. PubMed ID: 27793579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction for Breast Cancer in BI-RADS Category 4 Lesion Categorized by Age and Breast Composition of Women in Songklanagarind Hospital.
Noonpradej S; Wangkulangkul P; Woodtichartpreecha P; Laohawiriyakamol S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2021 Feb; 22(2):531-536. PubMed ID: 33639670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The value of breast MRI for BI-RADS category 4B mammographic microcalcification: based on the 5
Eun NL; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Youk JH; Kim JA
Clin Radiol; 2018 Aug; 73(8):750-755. PubMed ID: 29853301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Mammography-Based Nomogram for Prediction of Malignancy in Breast Suspicious Calcification.
Chen L; Duan HY; Tang XM; Ma CC; Yang L; Xie ZY; Gao ZZ; Chen JF
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jul; 29(7):1022-1028. PubMed ID: 34649781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
