These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31063419)
1. Comparison of Positive Predictive Values of Categorization of Suspicious Calcifications Using the 4th and 5th Editions of BI-RADS. Park GE; Kim SH; Lee JM; Kang BJ; Chae BJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Sep; 213(3):710-715. PubMed ID: 31063419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of malignancy risk stratification of microcalcifications detected on mammography: a study based on the 5th edition of BI-RADS. Kim SY; Kim HY; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):2895-901. PubMed ID: 25608770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Calcifications with suspicious morphology at mammography: should they all be considered with the same clinical significance? Choi WJ; Han K; Shin HJ; Lee J; Kim EK; Yoon JH Eur Radiol; 2021 Apr; 31(4):2529-2538. PubMed ID: 32960330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. "Category 4A" microcalcifications: how should this subcategory be applied to microcalcifications seen on mammography? Kim J; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH Acta Radiol; 2018 Feb; 59(2):147-153. PubMed ID: 28490180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Qualitative Radiogenomics: Association Between BI-RADS Calcification Descriptors and Recurrence Risk as Assessed by the Oncotype DX Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Score. Woodard GA; Price ER AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Apr; 212(4):919-924. PubMed ID: 30714832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast microcalcifications: the UK RCR 5-point breast imaging system or BI-RADS; which is the better predictor of malignancy? Metaxa L; Healy NA; O'Keeffe SA Br J Radiol; 2019 Nov; 92(1103):20190177. PubMed ID: 31365279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of microcalcification descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy. Burnside ES; Ochsner JE; Fowler KJ; Fine JP; Salkowski LR; Rubin DL; Sisney GA Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):388-95. PubMed ID: 17255409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scoring system based on BI-RADS lexicon to predict probability of malignancy in suspicious microcalcifications. Youk JH; Son EJ; Kim JA; Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Choi CH; Kim EK Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 19(5):1491-8. PubMed ID: 22173328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories. Bent CK; Bassett LW; D'Orsi CJ; Sayre JW AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 May; 194(5):1378-83. PubMed ID: 20410428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Usefulness and limitations of the Japan Mammography Guidelines for the categorization of microcalcifications. Uematsu T; Kasami M; Yuen S Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 18288569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Visual Assessment of Breast Density in BI-RADS 4th and 5th Editions With Automated Volumetric Measurement. Youk JH; Kim SJ; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim JA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):703-708. PubMed ID: 28657850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Scoring System to Stratify Malignancy Risks for Mammographic Microcalcifications Based on Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 5th Edition Descriptors. Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Eun NL; Choi EJ; Kim JA Korean J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 20(12):1646-1652. PubMed ID: 31854152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A matrix of morphology and distribution of calcifications in the breast: Analysis of 849 vacuum-assisted biopsies. Kaltenbach B; Brandenbusch V; Möbus V; Mall G; Falk S; van den Bergh M; Chevalier F; Müller-Schimpfle M Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 86():221-226. PubMed ID: 28027751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection and diagnosis of automated breast ultrasound in patients with BI-RADS category 4 microcalcifications: a retrospective study. Yu LF; Dai CC; Zhu LX; Xu XJ; Yan HJ; Jiang CX; Bao LY BMC Med Imaging; 2024 May; 24(1):126. PubMed ID: 38807064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammographic morphology and distribution of calcifications in ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed in organized screening. Hofvind S; Iversen BF; Eriksen L; Styr BM; Kjellevold K; Kurz KD Acta Radiol; 2011 Jun; 52(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 21498306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. AI-CAD for differentiating lesions presenting as calcifications only on mammography: outcome analysis incorporating the ACR BI-RADS descriptors for calcifications. Yoon J; Lee HS; Kim MJ; Park VY; Kim EK; Yoon JH Eur Radiol; 2022 Oct; 32(10):6565-6574. PubMed ID: 35748900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inter-reader Variability in the Use of BI-RADS Descriptors for Suspicious Findings on Diagnostic Mammography: A Multi-institution Study of 10 Academic Radiologists. Lee AY; Wisner DJ; Aminololama-Shakeri S; Arasu VA; Feig SA; Hargreaves J; Ojeda-Fournier H; Bassett LW; Wells CJ; De Guzman J; Flowers CI; Campbell JE; Elson SL; Retallack H; Joe BN Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):60-66. PubMed ID: 27793579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction for Breast Cancer in BI-RADS Category 4 Lesion Categorized by Age and Breast Composition of Women in Songklanagarind Hospital. Noonpradej S; Wangkulangkul P; Woodtichartpreecha P; Laohawiriyakamol S Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2021 Feb; 22(2):531-536. PubMed ID: 33639670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The value of breast MRI for BI-RADS category 4B mammographic microcalcification: based on the 5 Eun NL; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Youk JH; Kim JA Clin Radiol; 2018 Aug; 73(8):750-755. PubMed ID: 29853301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Mammography-Based Nomogram for Prediction of Malignancy in Breast Suspicious Calcification. Chen L; Duan HY; Tang XM; Ma CC; Yang L; Xie ZY; Gao ZZ; Chen JF Acad Radiol; 2022 Jul; 29(7):1022-1028. PubMed ID: 34649781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]