These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31063842)

  • 1. An investigation of inter-shock timing and electrode placement for double-sequential defibrillation.
    Taylor TG; Melnick SB; Chapman FW; Walcott GP
    Resuscitation; 2019 Jul; 140():194-200. PubMed ID: 31063842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dual Defibrillation is Highly Variable: An Analysis of Pulse Interval Delivered in Dual Defibrillation.
    Hamilton RJ; Ramzy M; Teufel J; Laub G; Kresh JY
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2020; 24(2):232-237. PubMed ID: 31116612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Overlapping sequential pulses. A new waveform for transthoracic defibrillation.
    Kerber RE; Spencer KT; Kallok MJ; Birkett C; Smith R; Yoerger D; Kieso RA
    Circulation; 1994 May; 89(5):2369-79. PubMed ID: 8181163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Case Series of Double Sequence Defibrillation.
    Merlin MA; Tagore A; Bauter R; Arshad FH
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2016; 20(4):550-3. PubMed ID: 26848018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selecting the transthoracic defibrillation shock directional vector based on VF amplitude improves shock success.
    Brooks L; Zhang Y; Dendi R; Anderson RH; Zimmerman B; Kerber RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2009 Sep; 20(9):1032-8. PubMed ID: 19460079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minor Variations in Electrode Pad Placement Impact Defibrillation Success.
    Esibov A; Chapman FW; Melnick SB; Sullivan JL; Walcott GP
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2016; 20(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 26383036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of single-biphasic versus sequential-biphasic shocks on defibrillation threshold in pigs.
    Csanadi Z; Jones DL; Wood GK; Klein GJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jun; 20(6):1606-12. PubMed ID: 9227756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness of Prehospital Dual Sequential Defibrillation for Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation and Ventricular Tachycardia Cardiac Arrest.
    Beck LR; Ostermayer DG; Ponce JN; Srinivasan S; Wang HE
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2019; 23(5):597-602. PubMed ID: 30773983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shock timing lowers transvenous defibrillation energy requirement.
    Hsu W; Lin Y; Lang DJ; Jones JL
    J Electrocardiol; 1998; 31 Suppl():35-40. PubMed ID: 9988003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of shock timing on defibrillation success.
    Hsu W; Lin Y; Heil JE; Jones J; Lang DJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jan; 20(1 Pt 2):153-7. PubMed ID: 9121980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Position of epicardial patch electrodes for implantable defibrillation significantly affects shock strength requirements.
    KenKnight BH; Heil JE; Hahn SJ; Lang DJ
    Acad Emerg Med; 1995 Jan; 2(1):50-5, discussion 55-6. PubMed ID: 7606614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Double and triple sequential shocks reduce ventricular defibrillation threshold in dogs with and without myocardial infarction.
    Chang MS; Inoue H; Kallok MJ; Zipes DP
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1986 Dec; 8(6):1393-405. PubMed ID: 3782643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vector magnitude using orthogonal ECG leads during ventricular fibrillation is associated with defibrillation outcome.
    Gurunathan S; Hsia PW; Lawton J; Hua DP
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1998; 32(1):48-61. PubMed ID: 9475962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of time to defibrillation and subthreshold preshocks on defibrillation success in pigs.
    Fujimura O; Jones DL; Klein GJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Feb; 12(2):358-65. PubMed ID: 2468146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved efficacy of anodal biphasic defibrillation shocks following a failed defibrillation attempt.
    Roberts PR; Allen S; Smith DC; Urban JF; Euler DE; Kallok MJ; Morgan JM
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Dec; 22(12):1753-9. PubMed ID: 10642128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biphasic waveform external defibrillation thresholds for spontaneous ventricular fibrillation secondary to acute ischemia.
    Walcott GP; Killingsworth CR; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2002 Jan; 39(2):359-65. PubMed ID: 11788232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Defibrillation threshold and cardiac responses using an external biphasic defibrillator with pediatric and adult adhesive patches in pediatric-sized piglets.
    Killingsworth CR; Melnick SB; Chapman FW; Walker RG; Smith WM; Ideker RE; Walcott GP
    Resuscitation; 2002 Nov; 55(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 12413756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Double sequential defibrillation therapy for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: The London experience.
    Emmerson AC; Whitbread M; Fothergill RT
    Resuscitation; 2017 Aug; 117():97-101. PubMed ID: 28624593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ventricular proarrhythmic effects of ventricular cycle length and shock strength in a sheep model of transvenous atrial defibrillation.
    Ayers GM; Alferness CA; Ilina M; Wagner DO; Sirokman WA; Adams JM; Griffin JC
    Circulation; 1994 Jan; 89(1):413-22. PubMed ID: 8281677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Current is better than energy as predictor of success for biphasic defibrillatory shocks in a porcine model of ventricular fibrillation.
    Ristagno G; Yu T; Quan W; Freeman G; Li Y
    Resuscitation; 2013 May; 84(5):678-83. PubMed ID: 23032689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.