These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31064045)
1. Effect of Cage in Radiological Differences between Direct and Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Techniques. Ko MJ; Park SW; Kim YB J Korean Neurosurg Soc; 2019 Jul; 62(4):432-441. PubMed ID: 31064045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative Study of the Difference of Perioperative Complication and Radiologic Results: MIS-DLIF (Minimally Invasive Direct Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion) Versus MIS-OLIF (Minimally Invasive Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion). Jin J; Ryu KS; Hur JW; Seong JH; Kim JS; Cho HJ Clin Spine Surg; 2018 Feb; 31(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 28059946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical Effects of an Oblique Lumbar PEEK Cage and Posterior Augmentation. Soriano-Baron H; Newcomb AGUS; Malhotra D; Martinez Del Campo E; Palma AE; Theodore N; Crawford NR; Kelly BP; Kaibara T World Neurosurg; 2019 Jun; 126():e975-e981. PubMed ID: 30876999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in radiographic and clinical outcomes of oblique lateral interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: a meta-analysis. Li HM; Zhang RJ; Shen CL BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Dec; 20(1):582. PubMed ID: 31801508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the location of intervertebral cages during oblique lateral interbody fusion surgery to achieve sagittal correction. Shiga Y; Orita S; Inage K; Sato J; Fujimoto K; Kanamoto H; Abe K; Kubota G; Yamauchi K; Eguchi Y; Inoue M; Kinoshita H; Aoki Y; Nakamura J; Matsuura Y; Hynes R; Furuya T; Koda M; Takahashi K; Ohtori S Spine Surg Relat Res; 2017; 1(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 31440634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Technical description of oblique lateral interbody fusion at L1-L5 (OLIF25) and at L5-S1 (OLIF51) and evaluation of complication and fusion rates. Woods KR; Billys JB; Hynes RA Spine J; 2017 Apr; 17(4):545-553. PubMed ID: 27884744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors affecting successful immediate indirect decompression in oblique lateral interbody fusion in lumbar spinal stenosis patients. Park J; Park SM; Han S; Jeon Y; Hong JY N Am Spine Soc J; 2023 Dec; 16():100279. PubMed ID: 37869545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Influence of Endplate Morphology on Cage Subsidence in Patients With Stand-Alone Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF). Hu Z; He D; Gao J; Zeng Z; Jiang C; Ni W; Yik JHN; Zhao X; Fan S Global Spine J; 2023 Jan; 13(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 33685261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of the lateral cage placement under intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy in oblique lateral interbody fusion. Chung NS; Lee HD; Jeon CH J Orthop Sci; 2018 Nov; 23(6):918-922. PubMed ID: 30119930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cage Obliquity and Radiological Outcomes in Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion. Park KH; Chung HW; Lee HD; Jeon CH; Koh JH; Chung NS Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 Nov; 48(22):1611-1616. PubMed ID: 36255377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Precautions for Combined Anterior and Posterior Long-Level Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity: Perioperative Surgical Complications Related to the Anterior Procedure (Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion). Kim WJ; Lee JW; Kim SM; Park KY; Chang SH; Song DG; Choy WS Asian Spine J; 2019 Oct; 13(5):823-831. PubMed ID: 31154755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes of direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF) in an Australian cohort. Scherman DB; Rao PJ; Phan K; Mungovan SF; Faulder K; Dandie G J Spine Surg; 2019 Mar; 5(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 31032433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors Affecting Cage Obliquity and the Relationship between Cage Obliquity and Radiological Outcomes in Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at the L4-L5 Level. Jang C; Hwang S; Jin TK; Shin HJ; Cho BK J Korean Neurosurg Soc; 2023 Nov; 66(6):703-715. PubMed ID: 37884282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modic Changes (MCs) Associated with Endplate Sclerosis Can Prevent Cage Subsidence in Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) Stand-Alone. Liu J; Ding W; Yang D; Wu H; Hao L; Hu Z; Fan S; Zhao F World Neurosurg; 2020 Jun; 138():e160-e168. PubMed ID: 32081816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cage Obliquity in Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion-How Common Is It and What Are the Effects on Fusion Rates, Subsidence, and Sagittal Alignment? A Computed Tomography-Based Analysis. Foong BCM; Wong JYH; Betzler B; Oh JYL Int J Spine Surg; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39117459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical and radiological outcomes of a new cage for direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Kim SJ; Lee YS; Kim YB; Park SW; Hung VT Korean J Spine; 2014 Sep; 11(3):145-51. PubMed ID: 25346760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity with Sagittal Imbalance Using Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Can We Predict How Much Lordosis Correction Is Possible? Kim WJ; Lee JW; Park KY; Chang SH; Song DG; Choy WS Asian Spine J; 2019 Dec; 13(6):1017-1027. PubMed ID: 31352725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk factors for postoperative ileus after oblique lateral interbody fusion: a multivariate analysis. Park SC; Chang SY; Mok S; Kim H; Chang BS; Lee CK Spine J; 2021 Mar; 21(3):438-445. PubMed ID: 33031922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]