These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31064608)

  • 1. Making prepublication independent replication mainstream.
    Tierney W; Schweinsberg M; Uhlmann EL
    Behav Brain Sci; 2018 Jan; 41():e153. PubMed ID: 31064608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Internal conceptual replications do not increase independent replication success.
    Kunert R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1631-1638. PubMed ID: 27068542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Reputational Consequences of Failed Replications and Wrongness Admission among Scientists.
    Fetterman AK; Sassenberg K
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0143723. PubMed ID: 26650842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How often are replication attempts questioned?
    Hensel PG
    Account Res; 2023 Apr; ():1-18. PubMed ID: 37012614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Data from a pre-publication independent replication initiative examining ten moral judgement effects.
    Tierney W; Schweinsberg M; Jordan J; Kennedy DM; Qureshi I; Sommer SA; Thornley N; Madan N; Vianello M; Awtrey E; Zhu LL; Diermeier D; Heinze JE; Srinivasan M; Tannenbaum D; Bivolaru E; Dana J; Davis-Stober CP; du Plessis C; Gronau QF; Hafenbrack AC; Liao EY; Ly A; Marsman M; Murase T; Schaerer M; Tworek CM; Wagenmakers EJ; Wong L; Anderson T; Bauman CW; Bedwell WL; Brescoll V; Canavan A; Chandler JJ; Cheries E; Cheryan S; Cheung F; Cimpian A; Clark MA; Cordon D; Cushman F; Ditto PH; Amell A; Frick SE; Gamez-Djokic M; Grady RH; Graham J; Gu J; Hahn A; Hanson BE; Hartwich NJ; Hein K; Inbar Y; Jiang L; Kellogg T; Legate N; Luoma TP; Maibeucher H; Meindl P; Miles J; Mislin A; Molden DC; Motyl M; Newman G; Ngo HH; Packham H; Ramsay PS; Ray JL; Sackett AM; Sellier AL; Sokolova T; Sowden W; Storage D; Sun X; Van Bavel JJ; Washburn AN; Wei C; Wetter E; Wilson CT; Darroux SC; Uhlmann EL
    Sci Data; 2016 Oct; 3():160082. PubMed ID: 27727246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Making replication mainstream.
    Zwaan RA; Etz A; Lucas RE; Donnellan MB
    Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Oct; 41():e120. PubMed ID: 29065933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility.
    Van Bavel JJ; Mende-Siedlecki P; Brady WJ; Reinero DA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jun; 113(23):6454-9. PubMed ID: 27217556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ease of articulation: A replication.
    Shuster LI; Cottrill C
    J Commun Disord; 2015; 56():1-7. PubMed ID: 26071668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three ways to make replication mainstream.
    Gernsbacher MA
    Behav Brain Sci; 2018 Jan; 41():e129. PubMed ID: 30757985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Effect of Replications on Citation Patterns: Evidence From a Large-Scale Reproducibility Project.
    Schafmeister F
    Psychol Sci; 2021 Oct; 32(10):1537-1548. PubMed ID: 34534028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. No relationship between researcher impact and replication effect: an analysis of five studies with 100 replications.
    Protzko J; Schooler JW
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e8014. PubMed ID: 32231868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enhancing reproducibility: Failures from Reproducibility Initiatives underline core challenges.
    Mullane K; Williams M
    Biochem Pharmacol; 2017 Aug; 138():7-18. PubMed ID: 28396196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When both the original study and its failed replication are correct: Feeling observed eliminates the facial-feedback effect.
    Noah T; Schul Y; Mayo R
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 May; 114(5):657-664. PubMed ID: 29672101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The importance of exact conceptual replications.
    Petty RE
    Behav Brain Sci; 2018 Jan; 41():e146. PubMed ID: 31064535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Alleged Crisis and the Illusion of Exact Replication.
    Stroebe W; Strack F
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2014 Jan; 9(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 26173241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to make replications mainstream.
    IJzerman H; Grahe J; Brandt MJ
    Behav Brain Sci; 2018 Jan; 41():e136. PubMed ID: 31064518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Replication of influential studies on biomedical, social, behavioural and structural interventions for HIV prevention and treatment.
    Djimeu EW; Heard A
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240159. PubMed ID: 33079927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Bayesian Perspective on the Reproducibility Project: Psychology.
    Etz A; Vandekerckhove J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149794. PubMed ID: 26919473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Replications in Psychology Research: How Often Do They Really Occur?
    Makel MC; Plucker JA; Hegarty B
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2012 Nov; 7(6):537-42. PubMed ID: 26168110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selecting target papers for replication.
    Kuehberger A; Schulte-Mecklenbeck M
    Behav Brain Sci; 2018 Jan; 41():e139. PubMed ID: 31064529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.