252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31066079)
1. Matching algorithms for causal inference with multiple treatments.
Scotina AD; Gutman R
Stat Med; 2019 Jul; 38(17):3139-3167. PubMed ID: 31066079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Applied comparison of large-scale propensity score matching and cardinality matching for causal inference in observational research.
Fortin SP; Johnston SS; Schuemie MJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 May; 21(1):109. PubMed ID: 34030640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combining machine learning and matching techniques to improve causal inference in program evaluation.
Linden A; Yarnold PR
J Eval Clin Pract; 2016 Dec; 22(6):864-870. PubMed ID: 27353301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Matching estimators for causal effects of multiple treatments.
Scotina AD; Beaudoin FL; Gutman R
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Apr; 29(4):1051-1066. PubMed ID: 31138025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subgroup balancing propensity score.
Dong J; Zhang JL; Zeng S; Li F
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Mar; 29(3):659-676. PubMed ID: 31456486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
Waernbaum I
Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implications of the Propensity Score Matching Paradox in Pharmacoepidemiology.
Ripollone JE; Huybrechts KF; Rothman KJ; Ferguson RE; Franklin JM
Am J Epidemiol; 2018 Sep; 187(9):1951-1961. PubMed ID: 29750409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiple imputation procedures for estimating causal effects with multiple treatments with application to the comparison of healthcare providers.
Silva GC; Gutman R
Stat Med; 2022 Jan; 41(1):208-226. PubMed ID: 34726285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimation of causal effects of binary treatments in unconfounded studies.
Gutman R; Rubin DB
Stat Med; 2015 Nov; 34(26):3381-98. PubMed ID: 26013308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Propensity Score Methods for Analyzing Observational Data Like Randomized Experiments: Challenges and Solutions for Rare Outcomes and Exposures.
Ross ME; Kreider AR; Huang YS; Matone M; Rubin DM; Localio AR
Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Jun; 181(12):989-95. PubMed ID: 25995287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Propensity score methods for creating covariate balance in observational studies].
Pattanayak CW; Rubin DB; Zell ER
Rev Esp Cardiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):897-903. PubMed ID: 21872981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel approach for propensity score matching and stratification for multiple treatments: Application to an electronic health record-derived study.
Brown DW; DeSantis SM; Greene TJ; Maroufy V; Yaseen A; Wu H; Williams G; Swartz MD
Stat Med; 2020 Jul; 39(17):2308-2323. PubMed ID: 32297677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An omnibus approach to assess covariate balance in observational studies using the distance covariance.
Andrei AC; McCarthy PM
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Jul; 29(7):1846-1866. PubMed ID: 31559905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relaxed covariate overlap and margin-based causal effect estimation.
Ghosh D
Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(28):4252-4265. PubMed ID: 30168168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating the causal effects of chronic disease combinations on 30-day hospital readmissions based on observational Medicaid data.
Casucci S; Lin L; Hewner S; Nikolaev A
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Jun; 25(6):670-678. PubMed ID: 29202188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Approximate Bayesian Bootstrap procedures to estimate multilevel treatment effects in observational studies with application to type 2 diabetes treatment regimens.
Scotina AD; Zullo AR; Smith RJ; Gutman R
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Nov; 29(11):3362-3380. PubMed ID: 32588747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marginal mean weighting through stratification: a generalized method for evaluating multivalued and multiple treatments with nonexperimental data.
Hong G
Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):44-60. PubMed ID: 21843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of machine learning algorithms and covariate balance measures for propensity score matching and weighting.
Cannas M; Arpino B
Biom J; 2019 Jul; 61(4):1049-1072. PubMed ID: 31090108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating and improving a matched comparison of antidepressants and bone density.
Yu R
Biometrics; 2021 Dec; 77(4):1276-1288. PubMed ID: 32940344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
