These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31066146)

  • 1. Are machine learning based methods suited to address complex biological problems? Lessons from CAGI-5 challenges.
    Savojardo C; Babbi G; Bovo S; Capriotti E; Martelli PL; Casadio R
    Hum Mutat; 2019 Sep; 40(9):1455-1462. PubMed ID: 31066146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. PON-P and PON-P2 predictor performance in CAGI challenges: Lessons learned.
    Niroula A; Vihinen M
    Hum Mutat; 2017 Sep; 38(9):1085-1091. PubMed ID: 28224672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of in silico tools for the evaluation of p16INK4a (CDKN2A) variants in CAGI.
    Carraro M; Minervini G; Giollo M; Bromberg Y; Capriotti E; Casadio R; Dunbrack R; Elefanti L; Fariselli P; Ferrari C; Gough J; Katsonis P; Leonardi E; Lichtarge O; Menin C; Martelli PL; Niroula A; Pal LR; Repo S; Scaini MC; Vihinen M; Wei Q; Xu Q; Yang Y; Yin Y; Zaucha J; Zhao H; Zhou Y; Brenner SE; Moult J; Tosatto SCE
    Hum Mutat; 2017 Sep; 38(9):1042-1050. PubMed ID: 28440912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Missense variant pathogenicity predictors generalize well across a range of function-specific prediction challenges.
    Pejaver V; Mooney SD; Radivojac P
    Hum Mutat; 2017 Sep; 38(9):1092-1108. PubMed ID: 28508593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CAGI SickKids challenges: Assessment of phenotype and variant predictions derived from clinical and genomic data of children with undiagnosed diseases.
    Kasak L; Hunter JM; Udani R; Bakolitsa C; Hu Z; Adhikari AN; Babbi G; Casadio R; Gough J; Guerrero RF; Jiang Y; Joseph T; Katsonis P; Kotte S; Kundu K; Lichtarge O; Martelli PL; Mooney SD; Moult J; Pal LR; Poitras J; Radivojac P; Rao A; Sivadasan N; Sunderam U; Saipradeep VG; Yin Y; Zaucha J; Brenner SE; Meyn MS
    Hum Mutat; 2019 Sep; 40(9):1373-1391. PubMed ID: 31322791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reports from the fifth edition of CAGI: The Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation.
    Andreoletti G; Pal LR; Moult J; Brenner SE
    Hum Mutat; 2019 Sep; 40(9):1197-1201. PubMed ID: 31334884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Working toward precision medicine: Predicting phenotypes from exomes in the Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation (CAGI) challenges.
    Daneshjou R; Wang Y; Bromberg Y; Bovo S; Martelli PL; Babbi G; Lena PD; Casadio R; Edwards M; Gifford D; Jones DT; Sundaram L; Bhat RR; Li X; Pal LR; Kundu K; Yin Y; Moult J; Jiang Y; Pejaver V; Pagel KA; Li B; Mooney SD; Radivojac P; Shah S; Carraro M; Gasparini A; Leonardi E; Giollo M; Ferrari C; Tosatto SCE; Bachar E; Azaria JR; Ofran Y; Unger R; Niroula A; Vihinen M; Chang B; Wang MH; Franke A; Petersen BS; Pirooznia M; Zandi P; McCombie R; Potash JB; Altman RB; Klein TE; Hoskins RA; Repo S; Brenner SE; Morgan AA
    Hum Mutat; 2017 Sep; 38(9):1182-1192. PubMed ID: 28634997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. BRCA1- and BRCA2-specific in silico tools for variant interpretation in the CAGI 5 ENIGMA challenge.
    Padilla N; Moles-Fernández A; Riera C; Montalban G; Özkan S; Ootes L; Bonache S; Díez O; Gutiérrez-Enríquez S; de la Cruz X
    Hum Mutat; 2019 Sep; 40(9):1593-1611. PubMed ID: 31112341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Blind prediction of deleterious amino acid variations with SNPs&GO.
    Capriotti E; Martelli PL; Fariselli P; Casadio R
    Hum Mutat; 2017 Sep; 38(9):1064-1071. PubMed ID: 28102005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing predictions of the impact of variants on splicing in CAGI5.
    Mount SM; Avsec Ž; Carmel L; Casadio R; Çelik MH; Chen K; Cheng J; Cohen NE; Fairbrother WG; Fenesh T; Gagneur J; Gotea V; Holzer T; Lin CF; Martelli PL; Naito T; Nguyen TYD; Savojardo C; Unger R; Wang R; Yang Y; Zhao H
    Hum Mutat; 2019 Sep; 40(9):1215-1224. PubMed ID: 31301154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What went wrong with variant effect predictor performance for the PCM1 challenge.
    Miller M; Wang Y; Bromberg Y
    Hum Mutat; 2019 Sep; 40(9):1486-1494. PubMed ID: 31268618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lessons from the CAGI-4 Hopkins clinical panel challenge.
    Chandonia JM; Adhikari A; Carraro M; Chhibber A; Cutting GR; Fu Y; Gasparini A; Jones DT; Kramer A; Kundu K; Lam HYK; Leonardi E; Moult J; Pal LR; Searls DB; Shah S; Sunyaev S; Tosatto SCE; Yin Y; Buckley BA
    Hum Mutat; 2017 Sep; 38(9):1155-1168. PubMed ID: 28397312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Objective assessment of the evolutionary action equation for the fitness effect of missense mutations across CAGI-blinded contests.
    Katsonis P; Lichtarge O
    Hum Mutat; 2017 Sep; 38(9):1072-1084. PubMed ID: 28544059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of computational methods for the evaluation of pericentriolar material 1 missense variants in CAGI-5.
    Monzon AM; Carraro M; Chiricosta L; Reggiani F; Han J; Ozturk K; Wang Y; Miller M; Bromberg Y; Capriotti E; Savojardo C; Babbi G; Martelli PL; Casadio R; Katsonis P; Lichtarge O; Carter H; Kousi M; Katsanis N; Andreoletti G; Moult J; Brenner SE; Ferrari C; Leonardi E; Tosatto SCE
    Hum Mutat; 2019 Sep; 40(9):1474-1485. PubMed ID: 31260570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ensemble variant interpretation methods to predict enzyme activity and assign pathogenicity in the CAGI4 NAGLU (Human N-acetyl-glucosaminidase) and UBE2I (Human SUMO-ligase) challenges.
    Yin Y; Kundu K; Pal LR; Moult J
    Hum Mutat; 2017 Sep; 38(9):1109-1122. PubMed ID: 28544272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CAGI 5 splicing challenge: Improved exon skipping and intron retention predictions with MMSplice.
    Cheng J; Çelik MH; Nguyen TYD; Avsec Ž; Gagneur J
    Hum Mutat; 2019 Sep; 40(9):1243-1251. PubMed ID: 31070280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CAGI, the Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation, establishes progress and prospects for computational genetic variant interpretation methods.
    Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation Consortium
    Genome Biol; 2024 Feb; 25(1):53. PubMed ID: 38389099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CAGI5: Objective performance assessments of predictions based on the Evolutionary Action equation.
    Katsonis P; Lichtarge O
    Hum Mutat; 2019 Sep; 40(9):1436-1454. PubMed ID: 31317604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. parSMURF, a high-performance computing tool for the genome-wide detection of pathogenic variants.
    Petrini A; Mesiti M; Schubach M; Frasca M; Danis D; Re M; Grossi G; Cappelletti L; Castrignanò T; Robinson PN; Valentini G
    Gigascience; 2020 May; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 32444882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variation Interpretation Predictors: Principles, Types, Performance, and Choice.
    Niroula A; Vihinen M
    Hum Mutat; 2016 Jun; 37(6):579-97. PubMed ID: 26987456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.